Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14970
| From | Jorge Moraleda <jorge.moraleda@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv |
| Date | 2023-03-05 13:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <G5VbX-ahx0-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <G5j6F-9QDs-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <G5kcp-9ReX-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <G5kvM-9Rly-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <G5l8t-9RNG-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <G5U6d-agR6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
FWIW, I am one of those power users that develop python applications and prefer the simplicity of a single environment. In my personal experience, installing using `sudo pip` (or user pip, which I don't do at all) is not a frequent operation for users that choose to manage a single environment. Personally, I use it only after searching in apt and confirming the package is not there. Having to type --break-system-packages every time when I have to do it is a good solution for me that I find completely reasonable. Thank you! On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 5:47 AM Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 04:22:11PM -0500, Jorge Moraleda wrote: > > Jeremy, Thank you for your quick reply! > > > > I did not know about `sudo pip install --break-system-packages foo` or > `sudo rm > > /usr/lib/python3.11/EXTERNALLY-MANAGED` (Frankly I only knew about this > issue > > what I have read on this discussion). This is very helpful and it really > changes > > my outlook on this topic. > > The --break-system-packages option is noted in > /usr/share/doc/python3.11/README.venv, and this file is mentioned in > the NEWS file for python3.11. The > /usr/lib/python3.11/EXTERNALLY-MANAGED file is not mentioned there; I > personally think that having to type --break-system-packages every > time one installs a package via pip globally or on a per-user basis is > safer, as it reminds you that you run risks doing so. > > Best wishes, > > Julian >
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
#!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> - 2023-03-03 16:30 +0100
Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی <dani.behzi@ubuntu.com> - 2023-03-03 19:50 +0100
Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2023-03-03 20:20 +0100
Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv Jorge Moraleda <jorge.moraleda@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 21:30 +0100
Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2023-03-03 21:50 +0100
Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv Jorge Moraleda <jorge.moraleda@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 22:30 +0100
Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2023-03-03 22:50 +0100
Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2023-03-05 11:50 +0100
Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv Jorge Moraleda <jorge.moraleda@gmail.com> - 2023-03-05 13:00 +0100
Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2023-03-09 23:40 +0100
Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> - 2023-03-05 14:20 +0100
Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2023-03-03 21:50 +0100
csiph-web