Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14501
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: bringing python-django-registration back into testing, dfsg issues |
| Date | Tue, 27 Sep 2022 00:30:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Fa4LT-aixP-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <F9Srn-abgl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | "debian-python@lists.debian.org" <debian-python@lists.debian.org> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Sep 26 22:26:19 2022 |
| Old-Return-Path | <csmall@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-105.192 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -3.5 |
| X-Greylist | delayed 457 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 22:25:59 UTC |
| X-Gm-Message-State | ACrzQf0wE2yh3YuEY7aNOZnqP0+4RAh8pWoZLPXF+i4coVohU5DoEADW GWyJxrOETawz6u6sxubbfLCbRyv+9Vxq/j0iX27lKA== |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | AMsMyM7nkQfb+IYUhyKL0wrbizAiqArWOtLlekMmqP2ouzLugQNjH9EMeaDOPL9fgxpJqWYzhuY0ePKx0MT63FHjMGg= |
| X-Received | by 2002:a17:907:c05:b0:73d:6e0a:8d22 with SMTP id ga5-20020a1709070c0500b0073d6e0a8d22mr20715749ejc.646.1664230670685; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:17:50 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID | <CALy8Cw5rv7RntVKWBMHnq2Fmz92qY=q+=9dc69LOeb8T8u0f-Q@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f3749405e99be5ed" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20346 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CALy8Cw5rv7RntVKWBMHnq2Fmz92qY=q+=9dc69LOeb8T8u0f-Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 112 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 27 Sep 2022 08:17:39 +1000 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CALy8Cw5rv7RntVKWBMHnq2Fmz92qY=q+=9dc69LOeb8T8u0f-Q@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <YzFuPEy0miBrGJAI@manillaroad.local.home.trueelena.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14501 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 19:18, Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi < valhalla@debian.org> wrote: > http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/Scripts.txt > http://www.unicode.org/Public/security/latest/confusables.txt > which, if my understanding of https://www.unicode.org/copyright.html is > correct aren't DFSG, but could be redistributed. > Given they sit under Public aren't they DATA FILES and subject to https://www.unicode.org/license.txt That license seems very BSD 3-Clause-ish. I suppose it comes down to what "Further specification" means. Does it mean license.txt overrules copyright.html? You could ask debian-legal for guidance. Do you think it is ok to upload the package like this? > It's not ideal but if the result is you cannot use those confusables then its the only way forward. > 2) Even if the answer to 1 is yes, I can also try to package > confusable_homoglyphs: upstream can download the files from the unicode > consortium if they aren't available: do you think it's better to use > that ability and package the file in contrib, or just put everything in > non-free? > > Personally, the latter sounds quite easier, and I would be strongly > tempted by it. > I have a similar problem with SNMP MIBs (thanks IETF). They're not even redistributable so I have a contrib mibs-downloader package. If the system can do it itself, that's ok but it needs to be something that the user knows is happening. I have had issues with WordPress before where it has links in some of the themes. So in summary: * See if license.txt is the actual license and its DFSG free (I think it could be) * If not, I'd package the files in a separate archive - Craig -- > Elena ``of Valhalla'' > > 🧛 >
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
bringing python-django-registration back into testing, dfsg issues Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi <valhalla@debian.org> - 2022-09-26 11:20 +0200
Re: bringing python-django-registration back into testing, dfsg issues Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> - 2022-09-27 00:30 +0200
Re: bringing python-django-registration back into testing, dfsg issues Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi <valhalla@debian.org> - 2022-09-30 10:50 +0200
csiph-web