Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14718

Re: [MBF] pybuild: Stop calling setup.py test?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Stuart Prescott <stuart@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: [MBF] pybuild: Stop calling setup.py test?
Date Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:30:02 +0100
Message-ID <FC0pc-ag3Z-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EUN0B-NvZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <FBgml-9N1C-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <FBiRb-9Opf-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Dec 12 23:21:54 2022
Old-Return-Path <stuart.debian@nanonanonano.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.75 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .nanonanonano. - helo: .mail-pj1-f45.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -3.5
X-Gm-Message-State ANoB5pkeqeauNsJRbUEcXs7OporCmkTzDPI89IFjSRSNX++VkF48QsNc uNpo95l6jx4uSDSqYTwlipEfOldauk+D7Vgk
X-Google-SMTP-Source AA0mqf5k/vyu2D4gbpq4YN/hjpEt3K6NGAXVCloO+cxo8eeI5XQSzLcxSXrIVTtx9PePb3PrEGNyjw==
X-Received by 2002:a17:903:2481:b0:189:b0ff:e316 with SMTP id p1-20020a170903248100b00189b0ffe316mr16510543plw.38.1670887295113; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:21:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version 1.0
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Content-Language en-GB
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20584
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/919d684a-c2e4-c2fd-8a7f-21436905d62d@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 41
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:21:31 +1100
X-Original-Message-ID <919d684a-c2e4-c2fd-8a7f-21436905d62d@debian.org>
X-Original-References <20220815182722.7gahp4b63macxq6a@satie.tumbleweed.org.za> <Y5UDsK+syQd2RFC/@riva.ucam.org> <e8d3d26f-b8f0-1272-e4de-e165113a2cb9@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14718

Show key headers only | View raw



On 11/12/2022 11:50, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> On 2022-12-10 17 h 09, Colin Watson wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 06:27:22PM +0000, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>>> Calling "setup.py test" has been deprecated since setuptools 28.5.
>>> That's 6 years ago.

> This is the list we used during the sprint to coordinate:
> 
> https://pad.riseup.net/p/FixSetupTest-keep
> 
> It's probably outdated though and I feel a real MBF would be helpful to 
> keep track at this point...

Yep, let's get an MBF in place for this. The BTS with usertags (or the 
BTS view through UDD with usertags) is a much better way of tracking a 
todo list at this stage.

I'm not sure if there is a published deprecation timeline for "setup.py 
test", but given the number of nasty surprises we've had from setuptools 
over the last year with their current break-it-and-see-who-complains 
development paradigm, let's assume the worst.

Given it's not currently broken, I guess it would start with 
severity:important and become severity:serious once setuptools stops 
supporting this?

Assuming that we're not going to suddenly get a breaking setuptools 
before bookworm, the MBF text should have a note that this will not 
become serious before the release of bookworm. (Do we know if that is true?)


cheers
Stuart


-- 
Stuart Prescott   http://www.nanonanonano.net/ stuart@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer  http://www.debian.org/       stuart@debian.org
GPG fingerprint   90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[MBF] pybuild: Stop calling setup.py test? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-08-15 20:30 +0200
  Re: [MBF] pybuild: Stop calling setup.py test? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-08-15 21:40 +0200
  Re: [MBF] pybuild: Stop calling setup.py test? Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2022-12-10 23:20 +0100
    Re: [MBF] pybuild: Stop calling setup.py test? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-12-11 02:00 +0100
      Re: [MBF] pybuild: Stop calling setup.py test? Stuart Prescott <stuart@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 00:30 +0100

csiph-web