Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14708

Re: pyfakefs: Outdate version was migrated today

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: pyfakefs: Outdate version was migrated today
Date Fri, 09 Dec 2022 22:00:01 +0100
Message-ID <FASDn-9y9G-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <FASk1-9y33-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Dec 9 20:59:03 2022
Old-Return-Path <swt@techie.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.2 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20574
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/3786c059-7c1-ffe9-498e-e6ebf211d@techie.net
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 21
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Fri, 9 Dec 2022 15:58:20 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-Message-ID <3786c059-7c1-ffe9-498e-e6ebf211d@techie.net>
X-Original-References <c377267d90d6894ac37bcedf1e7d1fc8@posteo.de>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14708

Show key headers only | View raw


On Fri, 9 Dec 2022, c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote:

> Hello folks,
> my question is not critic but just learning purpose. Because in the Debian 
> universe I always assume that there is a good reason behind each activity, no 
> matter if I understand it or not.
>
> Here is one I don't understand.
> Today (9th December '22) pyfakefs 4.6.3 was migrated [1] into testing. But 
> the latest stable release at upstream is 5.0.0 release two months ago [2].
>
> So why does a Debian package maintainer invest time and resources into 
> packaging an out dated version of a package?

The version that migrated to testing on 9 December was just a bug fix, see 
[3].  Version 4.6.3 was initially packaged on 12 September [4].

Scott

[3] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1393666/accepted-python-pyfakefs-463-3-source-into-unstable/
[4] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1361844/accepted-python-pyfakefs-463-1-source-into-unstable/

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pyfakefs: Outdate version was migrated today c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2022-12-09 21:40 +0100
  Re: pyfakefs: Outdate version was migrated today Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> - 2022-12-09 22:00 +0100

csiph-web