Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14072
| From | Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? |
| Date | 2022-04-24 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EfRl7-aWuZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <EfQIp-aWgw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EfQIp-aWgw-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 10:09:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 09:01:02PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Somehow I managed to really mess up a commit to python-qtconsole: the > > upstream and pristine-tar branches do not have the upstream/5.3.0 > > sources (the current ones). However, there's already an > > upstream/5.3.0 tag in the repository, pointing to a commit to the > > master branch. > > > > I think the simplest thing to do is to "rewrite history": delete the > > head commits to the master branch and the 5.3.0 tags, and then > > recommit correctly and force-push to salsa. > > > > Would people be OK with me doing this, > > I'm not OK with rewriting history. > > > or do you have an alternative suggestion? > > Accept the failure, learn from it, move on, make new mistakes, learn from them. > > In other words: Do not spend energy on erasing a mistake^Wlearing expirience. I do understand this, but now someone cloning the repository and running "gbp buildpackage" won't be able to do so. I realise there is a much more minor change that would fix things: just delete the upstream/5.3.0 tag, create the upstream/5.3.0 pristine-tar and upstream branch contents manually, make a commit with those and recreate the upstream/5.3.0 tag to point to those. Would that be acceptable? Best wishes, Julian
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-04-24 22:10 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2022-04-24 22:10 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-04-24 22:50 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2022-04-25 08:20 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-04-24 22:50 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-04-24 23:00 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-04-24 23:20 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-04-24 23:30 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-04-24 23:20 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-04-26 12:10 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - Reporting the fix Geert Stappers <stappers@debian.org> - 2022-04-26 13:30 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - Reporting the fix Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-04-26 14:30 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-04-26 14:00 +0200
Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-04-26 14:40 +0200
csiph-web