Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14063
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: PyQt5 question: why are QOpenGLTimeMonitor/QOpenGLTimerQuery not defined on armhf? |
| Date | Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:40:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Ecvh7-8Vry-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Ecv7r-8VoC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Peter Michael Green <plugwash@debian.org> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Apr 15 14:35:34 2022 |
| Old-Return-Path | <julian@d-and-j.net> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-7.21 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -4.6 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19887 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YlmCpHT3nDPSbW4L@d-and-j.net |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 15 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Fri, 15 Apr 2022 15:35:16 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <YlmCpHT3nDPSbW4L@d-and-j.net> |
| X-Original-References | <87eadd70-2dfc-439c-6fef-ddffabfe5756@debian.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14063 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 03:01:43PM +0100, Peter Michael Green wrote: > But nowhere do I find any of QT_NO_OPENGL or QT_OPENGL_ES* defined in > the package (but then maybe I'm not looking in the right place? So I > don't know why these two classes are included in the amd64 version of > the package but not the armhf version. > > The reason is that QT on armel/armhf is built for opengl ES rather > than desktop opengl. I believe the reason for this is historic > hardware support on armhf systems. Thanks Peter! Best wishes, Julian
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
re: PyQt5 question: why are QOpenGLTimeMonitor/QOpenGLTimerQuery not defined on armhf? Peter Michael Green <plugwash@debian.org> - 2022-04-15 16:30 +0200 Re: PyQt5 question: why are QOpenGLTimeMonitor/QOpenGLTimerQuery not defined on armhf? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-04-15 16:40 +0200
csiph-web