Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14345
| Path | csiph.com!pasdenom.info!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Cython 3.0.0 |
| Date | Sun, 14 Aug 2022 15:10:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EUlxn-wXg-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <EUgxH-tIe-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EUhtL-uj2-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Debian Python list <debian-python@lists.debian.org> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Aug 14 13:09:36 2022 |
| Old-Return-Path | <julian@d-and-j.net> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-5.97 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, SARE_LWSHORTT=1.24, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -4.6 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20179 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Yvj0AeuUH0mJvwm0@d-and-j.net |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 20 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Sun, 14 Aug 2022 14:09:21 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <Yvj0AeuUH0mJvwm0@d-and-j.net> |
| X-Original-References | <YvinJpL5j3t1bmBW@d-and-j.net> <20220814084906.nvtfehgyszgqlktr@satie.tumbleweed.org.za> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14345 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 08:49:06AM +0000, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Julian (2022.08.14_07:41:26_+0000) > > I don't know how many packages in Debian would be broken by the move > > to 3.0.0; that may be something worth exploring. It may well be that > > approach (2) makes most sense for the short term. > > I think that's the first question to answer. Once we know how bad > the incompatibilities are, we can decide on the best approach. > > So, first step is probably to package the new cython version (locally), > and try to rebuild everything against it. That sounds sensible, indeed, once the beta is released. As cython is used quite widely (240 packages or so in testing), I wonder whether it would be appropriate to upload it to experimental and ask Lucas to run the test builds across the archive? Best wishes, Julian
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Cython 3.0.0 Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-08-14 09:50 +0200
Re: Cython 3.0.0 Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-08-14 10:50 +0200
Re: Cython 3.0.0 Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-08-14 15:10 +0200
csiph-web