Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14251
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: List of packages of Python team that have no autopkgtest |
| Date | Tue, 19 Jul 2022 11:00:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EKRfb-cmCy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <EKOqZ-ckXq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EKPwK-clNw-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jul 19 08:58:01 2022 |
| Old-Return-Path | <andreas@an3as.eu> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-6.99 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate:hard: -4.6 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20086 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YtZyCu6NSiYqk6in@an3as.eu |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 26 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:57:46 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <YtZyCu6NSiYqk6in@an3as.eu> |
| X-Original-References | <YtZIMHT3QXkZuuSb@an3as.eu> <20220719080049.05d1ee97@tiger.codehelp> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14251 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi Neil,
Am Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 08:00:49AM +0100 schrieb Neil Williams:
> It seems to be a list of source packages, yet it contains duplicates
> (pelican appears twice, for example, as does python-git).
I confirm that I noticed this.
> autopkgtest
> is source-package based, so can this be fixed?
I'm 100% sure this can be fixed. ;-P
> Maybe take the highest
> popcon of all binaries from each single source package?
I confirm that I don't like the situation but I can't spent more time
into this for the moment. I'd recommend writing autopkgtest for the
duplicated packages first ... than these will vanish promptly. ;-P
Sorry for no better help at the moment - patches are always welcome
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
List of packages of Python team that have no autopkgtest Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-07-19 08:00 +0200
Re: List of packages of Python team that have no autopkgtest Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org> - 2022-07-19 09:10 +0200
Re: List of packages of Python team that have no autopkgtest Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-07-19 11:00 +0200
Re: List of packages of Python team that have no autopkgtest Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-07-19 10:30 +0200
Re: List of packages of Python team that have no autopkgtest Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2022-07-19 11:00 +0200
Re: List of packages of Python team that have no autopkgtest Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-07-19 14:40 +0200
Re: List of packages of Python team that have no autopkgtest Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-07-19 15:00 +0200
csiph-web