Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13672

Re: platform.machine() on salsa i386 build?

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: platform.machine() on salsa i386 build?
Date Sat, 30 Oct 2021 23:40:02 +0200
Message-ID <De4f0-7xK-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <DdVY6-22h-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <De2db-6gj-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Oct 30 21:30:09 2021
Old-Return-Path <news@liska.ath.cx>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.352 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Lines 28
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19472
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87k0hufc96.fsf@poch
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sat, 30 Oct 2021 23:12:21 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <87k0hufc96.fsf@poch>
X-Original-References <87fssi3drb.fsf@poch> <70c679a8-434a-44a0-18be-f440b4daf949@nileshpatra.info>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13672

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi Nilesh, Andrey,

Nilesh Patra <nilesh@nileshpatra.info> writes:
> On 10/30/21 5:50 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> Hi,
>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-astro-team/pyraf/-/jobs/2130878#L2062
>> How can one find out the correct machine here?
>
> I just committed something to salsa -- sort of a hack, but it works
> (i386 pipeline passes). I do this
> for one of my other package as well. Please consider taking a look.

Thank you, but I think I will not use it: This requires dpkg-dev (which
is the package with dpkg-architecture) being installed, which I would
not like to depend on just to have the possibility to test.

I will rather follow Stefanos hint to use sys.implementation._multiarch,
which is however hackish as well, since variables starting with "_"
should not considered as part of the API, and this may break without
warning.

Optimal would be a way to detect whether the internal floating point
processing happens with 80 bit FPU registers (i386) or 64 bit FPU
registers (other systems), since this is the relevant difference here.

Best regards

Ole

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

platform.machine() on salsa i386 build? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2021-10-30 14:50 +0200
  Re: platform.machine() on salsa i386 build? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-10-30 20:50 +0200
    Re: platform.machine() on salsa i386 build? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-10-31 02:20 +0200
  Re: platform.machine() on salsa i386 build? Nilesh Patra <nilesh@nileshpatra.info> - 2021-10-30 21:30 +0200
    Re: platform.machine() on salsa i386 build? Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2021-10-30 23:40 +0200
  Re: platform.machine() on salsa i386 build? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-10-30 21:50 +0200

csiph-web