Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13960

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?
Date Thu, 17 Feb 2022 22:00:01 +0100
Message-ID <DRW2B-2v2M-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <DRT4J-2tgC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DRV6x-2usV-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Feb 17 20:54:30 2022
Old-Return-Path <sandro.tosi@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.513 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-ej1-f47.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State AOAM533wIqOcmHwIFjBSi+d8B9+9sQegM0JuFVaWLPxs/Kqm3+5C+u9i m0EipIBtuNMLUIObYZJPkjzIDQBaH85YoOAt/nqsV8iz
X-Google-SMTP-Source ABdhPJx04SR5Kv2j8jxhnzjLDKQSsMzF4MZbZUbHiVOdd1de//Bnw20jthZK3MYmu1tfSKsixVbQNNvkED+pfbdY3iI=
X-Received by 2002:a17:906:cec5:b0:6d0:433:543f with SMTP id si5-20020a170906cec500b006d00433543fmr3785868ejb.672.1645131256162; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 12:54:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19774
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAB4XWXwy2A6FVrmNOY-P2E3tc4_vpd3baySRkDGDxB2MwV024Q@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 26
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:53:49 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID <CAB4XWXwy2A6FVrmNOY-P2E3tc4_vpd3baySRkDGDxB2MwV024Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <CAB4XWXxiJQKo_qKvUZ3n=hGqN=RPO6zQtcGUK5mAPJwKTvo_eA@mail.gmail.com> <Yg6n/lNxNQOSjNNc@an3as.eu>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13960

Show key headers only | View raw


> I admit I'm hesitating a bit for different reasons.  While I agree that
> direct commits are better than MRs I found several DPT packages with
> very sensible changes in Git but no uploads following these.  For
> instance fixing VCS fields and Maintainer name should be followed by an
> according upload to make those changes visible to users and developers
> of the *packages* in Debian.
>
> In the Debian Med team for instance we do those automatic changes before
> uploading a package - say when upgrading to new upstream versions or
> fixing some bugs.  Than we run the Janitor scripts and other automatic
> changes which is all done in routine-update.  I personally find this
> workflow more convenient.  That way Debian Med team (as well as pkg-r
> team) are blacklisted for Janitor to not have competing changes inside
> the package.

thanks for bringing the perspective of how things are done in the Med
team, but it feels none of the points you mentioned nor the specific
Med team workflow apply here, or are relevant to just let Janitor
commit directly to our packages.

Regards,
-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-02-17 18:50 +0100
  Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-02-17 21:00 +0100
    Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-02-17 22:00 +0100
      Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Nilesh Patra <nilesh@riseup.net> - 2022-02-17 22:10 +0100
        Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2022-02-19 14:30 +0100
  Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-03-29 23:50 +0200
    Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? stefanor@debian.org - 2022-05-24 12:40 +0200
      Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org> - 2022-05-24 12:50 +0200

csiph-web