Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13414

Re: RFS: python-click-log/0.3.2-1 -- Logging integration for Click - Python 3.x

Path csiph.com!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: RFS: python-click-log/0.3.2-1 -- Logging integration for Click - Python 3.x
Date Sat, 05 Jun 2021 22:30:01 +0200
Message-ID <CmL5D-7B3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CmrzX-4g2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CmFCV-4ln-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CmL5D-7B3-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Jun 5 20:25:16 2021
Old-Return-Path <stefano@rivera.za.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.224 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.374, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1; rate: -4.6
Mail-Followup-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Gpg-Public-Key http://www.rivera.za.net/stefano.gpg
User-Agent NeoMutt/20180716
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19204
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20210605202459.yx5ja4m7jytmcxyr@satie.tumbleweed.org.za
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 25
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sat, 5 Jun 2021 20:25:00 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <20210605202459.yx5ja4m7jytmcxyr@satie.tumbleweed.org.za>
X-Original-References <87mts51a3w.fsf@mykolab.com> <CACttXDOKU=8Osw=-65k6GW_-m3BeVGCyQdF_PvmXVu3-3+-w9g@mail.gmail.com> <66947278-d47c-87a7-4d67-738a8c3bcacf@nileshpatra.info>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13414

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi Nilesh (2021.06.05_15:21:22_+0000)
> > * What about adding an autopkgtest?
> 
> The test is running during build time.[1] I don't think running the same thing as autopkgtest does a very significant improvement.

I think there's generally an advantage in running the same upstream
tests at build time, as well as in an autopkgtest:

1. If something regresses the test suite, it'll block migration of that
   package into testing.
2. It verifies that the package behaves correctly, as installed. (This
   can mean that you need to disable part of the test-suite, that can't
   handle the installed layout.)

Yes, it's also good to have other kinds of tests in autopkgtests, that
verify installed behaviour (e.g. calling --help on an executable, to see
that it can start-up, and smoke testing library public interfaces).

SR

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  +1 415 683 3272

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#989486: RFS: python-click-log/0.3.2-1 -- Logging integration for Click - Python 3.x Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly <noon@mykolab.com> - 2021-06-05 01:40 +0200
  Re: RFS: python-click-log/0.3.2-1 -- Logging integration for Click -  Python 3.x Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-06-05 22:30 +0200
  Re: RFS: python-click-log/0.3.2-1 -- Logging integration for Click  - Python 3.x Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly <noon@mykolab.com> - 2021-06-08 00:40 +0200
  Bug#989486: RFS: python-click-log/0.3.2-1 -- Logging integration for Click - Python 3.x Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly <noon@mykolab.com> - 2021-06-08 14:00 +0200

csiph-web