Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13346
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Martin <debacle@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Remove trac from Debian 11? |
| Date | Mon, 10 May 2021 15:10:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CddPz-3Tg-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <CdbNM-2ow-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <CdbXr-2GT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon May 10 13:06:24 2021 |
| Old-Return-Path | <debacle@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-7.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate:hard: -2.7 |
| Old-X-Envelope-From | debacle@debian.org |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| Accept-Language | de, en, es |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19133 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YJkvvFsUI0syOQtX@fama.lan |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 10 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Mon, 10 May 2021 13:06:04 +0000 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <YJkvvFsUI0syOQtX@fama.lan> |
| X-Original-References | <YJkMfaOTzcurmsdR@fama.lan> <c27ef827-e554-e41e-ddad-030ac9ef28ef@debian.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13346 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2021-05-10 14:00, Andrius Merkys wrote: > I do not think that slowing down of development is reason serious enough > to remove a package which is otherwise fine. Or are there other reasons > that I am not aware of? I don't have a problem with slow development, but the current version is probably not good enough to maintain it for some years. I'm optimistic, that in some months or so 1.6.x will be released, which should be fine. I'm planning to backport it to Debian 11, so that users still can install trac easily.
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Remove trac from Debian 11? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-05-10 13:00 +0200
Re: Remove trac from Debian 11? Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2021-05-10 13:10 +0200
Re: Remove trac from Debian 11? Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-05-10 15:10 +0200
Re: Remove trac from Debian 11? Barin Montpris <barin@hashvault.io> - 2021-05-10 14:10 +0200
csiph-web