Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13552

Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED
Date	Sun, 19 Sep 2021 21:30:01 +0200
Message-ID	<CZaFH-2HO-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<CZaFH-2HO-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <CZaFH-2HO-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Sep 19 19:24:57 2021
Old-Return-Path	<debian@terceiro.xyz>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-11.952 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MD5_SHA1_SUM=-1, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .terceiro. - helo: .relay6-d.mail.gandi. - helo-domain: .gandi.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
Mail-Followup-To	Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>, Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de>, debian-python@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9JESJ7ACpQVj2lRi"
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19348
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YUeOdIS59hBeKG61@debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	74
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date	Sun, 19 Sep 2021 16:24:36 -0300
X-Original-Message-ID	<YUeOdIS59hBeKG61@debian.org>
X-Original-References	<E1mRrYl-000B13-7E@fasolo.debian.org> <1f944d96-c152-3a50-a20f-f0c5137493ce@t-online.de>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13552

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:27:21AM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hello Antonio,
> 
> as you initially did the first upload for this package I'm now heading
> over to you.
> 
> Am 19.09.21 um 09:48 schrieb Debian FTP Masters:
> > 
> > python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3.dsc: Invalid size hash for python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz:
> > According to the control file the size hash should be 6360,
> > but python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz has 6367.
> > 
> > If you did not include python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz in your upload, a different version
> > might already be known to the archive software.
> 
> I've no idea where the size of 6360 for the orig.tar.gz file is coming
> from which DAK refers.
> 
> If I look at the source package sites or on snapshot.d.o I always see a
> size of 6367.
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/python-django-js-asset
> http://snapshot.debian.org/package/python-django-js-asset/1.2.2-1/
> 
> And this size was recreated by gbp locally.
> But the question is now how to proceed now. A quick & dirty solution
> would be to simply use the old tar.gz file (if available).
> Another option would be more dramatically and let remove the package
> completely from the archive. Do you have opinions on that?

Looking from my side, the tarball from the archive (apt source
python-django-js-asset) and the one generated by pristine-tar are
identical:

4b6a2c8625b8e96bbc4ff1588a27238d7d418b03  /tmp/python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz
4b6a2c8625b8e96bbc4ff1588a27238d7d418b03  /tmp/archive/python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz

From reading the REJECT email, I think it implies that the .dsc/.changes
you uploaded refer to an orig tarball with 6360 bytes. Do you still have
the exact artifacts that you uploaded?

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2021-09-19 21:30 +0200
  Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2021-09-19 23:10 +0200
    Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-09-20 09:30 +0200
    Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2021-09-20 13:30 +0200
      Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-09-20 17:20 +0200
        Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-09-20 17:30 +0200
          Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-09-21 03:20 +0200
        Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-09-20 21:50 +0200
        Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2021-09-21 23:10 +0200
          Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2021-09-22 00:40 +0200
          Re: writing debian/gbp.conf considered harmful [was:  python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED] Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-09-22 09:30 +0200

csiph-web