Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13118
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures |
| Date | Wed, 20 Jan 2021 20:50:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <BzrEm-35B-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| X-Original-To | Debian Python <debian-python@lists.debian.org> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jan 20 19:40:02 2021 |
| Old-Return-Path | <skitt@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-11.112 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SARE_HEAD_8BIT_SPAM=0.888] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -3.5 |
| X-Mailer | Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/gMTT5+s.GpxmmOuTfqBCweD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18894 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20210120203941.1a41cc06@heffalump.sk2.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 53 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 20 Jan 2021 20:39:41 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20210120203941.1a41cc06@heffalump.sk2.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13118 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, I’ve come across a situation which doesn’t seem to be addressed by existing policies: the python-ptrace source package only ships architecture-independent content, but it works on a small number of architectures (currently, 32/64-bit x86, 32-bit ARM, 32/64-bit PPC). As a result, the packages it builds are installable everywhere, but that’s a false promise since they don’t work everywhere. Would it make sense to convert it to an architecture-dependent package, only on those architectures which are really supported? (In this specific instance, there’s an optional CPython extension which would be interesting, so I’d switch to an architecture-dependent package for this anyway, were I to maintain the package; but I thought this was an interesting question in general.) Regards, Stephen
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org> - 2021-01-20 20:50 +0100
Re: Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-01-20 21:10 +0100
Re: Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-01-21 02:50 +0100
Re: Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org> - 2021-01-21 08:10 +0100
Re: Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2021-01-21 14:20 +0100
Re: Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-01-21 14:30 +0100
Re: Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2021-01-21 16:50 +0100
Re: Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-01-22 00:40 +0100
Re: Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-01-22 00:50 +0100
Re: Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2021-01-22 10:00 +0100
Re: Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2021-01-21 14:40 +0100
Re: Generic Python packages which don’t work on all architectures Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> - 2021-01-21 16:20 +0100
csiph-web