Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13227

Re: Python package situation

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Python package situation
Date Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:00:01 +0100
Message-ID <BJoYx-6gl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BHoJk-6G2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BHulH-1CA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BJ4Gu-1w5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BJfse-7SD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BJfVg-8iG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BJjvP-391-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Feb 17 06:53:29 2021
Old-Return-Path <wrar@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-12 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -3.5
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wrar.name; s=20160710; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date: Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=RghFF+qj76/WZ5YzWJZCoVnh9/PnGq8WDMfmG99UGPI=; b=Kkz+x2qv6nxskHqZjRBwGWgsnI 3kJEQOtcR4DB60WpUYDV+7dmminqM+mf946XyuJeiCR1NXQstK5rFkZROnglta9yHP2dJqQYxRWiJ SMUpD1HOIWTFW7hEWPpITk7+s5ohzkmSxz8+aX19hxGzbFtwRLPLu3POxvv92uX2Z0Yc=;
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NsUJ65ib0gu8Onx/"
Content-Disposition inline
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19010
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YCy9WcIU0mJJqVcu@belkar.wrar.name
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 46
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Wed, 17 Feb 2021 11:53:13 +0500
X-Original-Message-ID <YCy9WcIU0mJJqVcu@belkar.wrar.name>
X-Original-References <20210211181234.GA4829@silverpine> <5c9a9365-20b9-c600-638c-6c74a024779a@debian.org> <s0g2iu$9h1$1@ciao.gmane.io> <YCwvhRb2pWtT91JG@fama> <YCw1boMi/ReDbwOx@belkar.wrar.name> <87y2fn7byv.fsf@canidae.wired.pri>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13227

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:51:52AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> I believe there are a number of Python packages in Debian unstable that
> are out of date in respect to latest upstream.
> 
> e.g.
> 
> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=bam%40debian.org&comaint=yes
> 
> Somebody needs to do the work to update them. But maybe the fact that
> nobody is doing so, might mean that nobody is using them?
And/or nobody who uses them is able to update them in Debian or at least
report a bug, and/or it's easier to install them directly than update them
in Debian and install from there.
Also note that many Python module packages in Debian have very low popcon.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Elana Hashman <ehashman@debian.org> - 2021-02-11 19:20 +0100
  Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-11 19:30 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 05:30 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 17:30 +0100
  Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 01:20 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye stefanor@debian.org - 2021-02-12 01:50 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 09:20 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 09:40 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 10:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 11:30 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 13:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Julien Palard <julien@palard.fr> - 2021-02-12 14:10 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:40 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 23:10 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 21:20 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 21:00 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Michael Kesper <mkesper@schokokeks.org> - 2021-02-12 21:50 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi@mithrandi.net> - 2021-02-12 10:30 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 10:50 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 11:40 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 12:10 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 15:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:00 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:20 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Michael Kesper <mkesper@schokokeks.org> - 2021-02-12 11:00 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-02-12 18:00 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Bastian Venthur <venthur@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 10:20 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 19:30 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-02-16 20:20 +0100
      Python package situation Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 21:50 +0100
        Re: Python package situation Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 22:20 +0100
          Re: Python package situation Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 23:20 +0100
          Re: Python package situation Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 02:10 +0100
            Re: Python package situation Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 08:00 +0100
            Re: Python package situation Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 10:30 +0100

csiph-web