Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13209

Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye

Path csiph.com!4.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye
Date Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:00:01 +0100
Message-ID <BHJ1n-1VJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BHoJk-6G2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BHulH-1CA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BHuOJ-1LJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BHCVY-6ID-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <BHDfj-6P6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BHHsC-18z-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Feb 12 15:59:32 2021
Old-Return-Path <andrius.merkys@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-4.946 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.105, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SARE_MLH_Stock10=1.66] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sZzkBNE98oPagk3ER7XEYSdCWkddJt2xyHRtddhSs1g=; b=qEKxa/PrfXcat9ihUU2e2t6CraZWksmKzFh13NK+WovOrt4uej/hE2iSAUDeQWITPy qyggOXBNKx2FprqLm2j/0cFi/hTnZllq7JzCKEFQZUYuxHd1c7UzuVAj+Dg5HiaTvZUI jaISSORRWKoepIGEUg/vTWt+jFVZJuTKvFt5hwcBQZClDQXiexNPQv6DRCfJN6r+6eg2 odygcIZ+FJwRYb8rIjq97UkNmv+JgQv9irTvtHWlVMbvRlEXsVzthTDPW9/JIGhLU5Hl BsAyjI/U2HPPEJaOyrJHv4N4nPButHYbBl67x9j5KxfU5OfyNmu7m6pGk79QijcxkXgx Pd5A==
X-Gm-Message-State AOAM532ZM6qqUfNk8NI/au7cryRWNKVyRMLVU6pXqyUb4K3GmoyNM1Zt y/lyeBZu/umRTYVnp3vuc56JcavuR90=
X-Google-SMTP-Source ABdhPJxp3ZDFlTmbMYpkDqGfawBKUvDu2PYHD9A1i5fW2qKH6NFfCTNS+jW7eY6BkXA3Yt6IBq05jQ==
X-Received by 2002:a05:6512:2159:: with SMTP id s25mr1904903lfr.341.1613145553019; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:59:13 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18992
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/cbd452b7-995c-6584-c65b-99fd8734dc96@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 15
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:59:12 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <cbd452b7-995c-6584-c65b-99fd8734dc96@debian.org>
X-Original-References <20210211181234.GA4829@silverpine> <5c9a9365-20b9-c600-638c-6c74a024779a@debian.org> <20210212004259.dnrbzkfkszwqctpw@satie.tumbleweed.org.za> <CAMcKhMSX1W66ndy1pFYk_3KSnCgSr5iXW+5wWPqCfO-FyZRgtw@mail.gmail.com> <20210212094048.GC29617@valentin-vidic.from.hr> <YCaOKmYO+o/l6EMo@momentum.pseudorandom.co.uk>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13209

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2021-02-12 16:18, Simon McVittie wrote:
> We have a python3 package already. If I saw a python3 package and a
> python3-core package, I would expect that either they're the same thing,
> or python3-core is a smaller and less fully-featured version of python3.
> 
> Conversely, we already have a python3-minimal package, and I would expect
> python3-core to be larger and more fully-featured than python3-minimal
> (or maybe the same), because by definition if it's minimal then it's
> the least Python you can have. So:
> 
>     python3-minimal ≤ python3-core ≤ python3 ≤ python3-full

+1. Exactly how I would understand these names.

Andrius

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Elana Hashman <ehashman@debian.org> - 2021-02-11 19:20 +0100
  Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-11 19:30 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 05:30 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 17:30 +0100
  Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 01:20 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye stefanor@debian.org - 2021-02-12 01:50 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 09:20 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 09:40 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 10:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 11:30 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 13:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Julien Palard <julien@palard.fr> - 2021-02-12 14:10 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:40 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 23:10 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 21:20 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 21:00 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Michael Kesper <mkesper@schokokeks.org> - 2021-02-12 21:50 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi@mithrandi.net> - 2021-02-12 10:30 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 10:50 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 11:40 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 12:10 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 15:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:00 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:20 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Michael Kesper <mkesper@schokokeks.org> - 2021-02-12 11:00 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-02-12 18:00 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Bastian Venthur <venthur@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 10:20 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 19:30 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-02-16 20:20 +0100
      Python package situation Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 21:50 +0100
        Re: Python package situation Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 22:20 +0100
          Re: Python package situation Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 23:20 +0100
          Re: Python package situation Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 02:10 +0100
            Re: Python package situation Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 08:00 +0100
            Re: Python package situation Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 10:30 +0100

csiph-web