Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13200

Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi@mithrandi.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye
Date Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:30:02 +0100
Message-ID <BHCVY-6ID-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BHoJk-6G2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BHulH-1CA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BHuOJ-1LJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Feb 12 09:24:09 2021
Old-Return-Path <mithrandi@mithrandi.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-2.54 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SARE_MLH_Stock10=1.66] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .mithrandi. - helo: .mail-ej1-x629.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mithrandi.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QsnQd0/OAsHh4Z2WXiUTsD7mH7tX9C7vXPGiKXsO1Tw=; b=uazMVDRab2HJyMIt5MyOLq83rfxug4ZJsJ2u6Jhj8Nak9b+K3niwotURJ7DwtuzfhT KT7yWrWWpKb39MG+n01HQoh9hXK9VA4mJs6sPUI7Dl5XQFJldMxkh6s058cbiUD0yYqp 5EQOQJ+P4Ti/7IiJ72tSyNPtV1YR/h5OrTA+I=
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=QsnQd0/OAsHh4Z2WXiUTsD7mH7tX9C7vXPGiKXsO1Tw=; b=m7zTfDV6etKFLxSSlsHyzBawXp3ouKHXcrClsLctmJXxwMudLQpg3n85bsoMGk9VE9 akThrNpaPLbV/ZhyTCekUnzSyvIcIu7ggA1rkRaQ+xUTrKKTJE+XwvNGKArf3fZ7TeE+ 2iPoGLqNEYgoFkRixWfDcYc3WcYqOwhfDUV1oR/smJSPtSOtcxYDQomKPa0Ev8VjI0E7 I32bRW4sim8p5Q4PzO7+yLnWY9YGSXgWfDAOmTgszltvrxQDIUrjwtPG7XeGUlsUd5Vv v4dbv2iU3QEFgZQTkw7LPwqOM4ttIJb/0mrHL1loHnUn+Mqmg7MITcrVYtw2YFqW0Ob2 uqGw==
X-Gm-Message-State AOAM5311YKYLYXNzG5Itl/UUUkxoXmYPCQZCiHM2JRSHwyinjohLXSWG wTqYg8k5QPXh18LR8M9jle3ELRnevUdZ9nWyXdItj3fNfAQ=
X-Google-SMTP-Source ABdhPJwvE96eAB3nNe7CpszM8c1kJrj+MBO+0NZB2naymCGd/cAtla6S7pbxDyy2Q0T0kLAduqNuvXtI5x+sErJE8Ks=
X-Received by 2002:a17:906:3acc:: with SMTP id z12mr2096398ejd.494.1613120905837; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:08:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000092945b05bb1ffa1b"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18983
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAMcKhMSX1W66ndy1pFYk_3KSnCgSr5iXW+5wWPqCfO-FyZRgtw@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 39
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:08:14 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <CAMcKhMSX1W66ndy1pFYk_3KSnCgSr5iXW+5wWPqCfO-FyZRgtw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <20210211181234.GA4829@silverpine> <5c9a9365-20b9-c600-638c-6c74a024779a@debian.org> <20210212004259.dnrbzkfkszwqctpw@satie.tumbleweed.org.za>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13200

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 02:43, <stefanor@debian.org> wrote:

> From your arguments above, it doesn't sound like the python3-full solves
> a problem you experience. So, I'm not sure why you'd be using it.
>
> If it doesn't include distutils, venv, lib2to3, etc. then it doesn't
> solve any problem we currently have, and we don't need it. The purpose
> is to provide a package that gives you the entire stdlib.
>

I wanted to point out that this follows the pattern set by the many other
*-full packages in Debian, such as ruby-full.

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Elana Hashman <ehashman@debian.org> - 2021-02-11 19:20 +0100
  Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-11 19:30 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 05:30 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 17:30 +0100
  Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 01:20 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye stefanor@debian.org - 2021-02-12 01:50 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 09:20 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 09:40 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 10:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 11:30 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 13:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Julien Palard <julien@palard.fr> - 2021-02-12 14:10 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:40 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-02-13 23:10 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 21:20 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 21:00 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Michael Kesper <mkesper@schokokeks.org> - 2021-02-12 21:50 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi@mithrandi.net> - 2021-02-12 10:30 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 10:50 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 11:40 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 12:10 +0100
          Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 15:20 +0100
            Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:00 +0100
              Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2021-02-12 17:20 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Michael Kesper <mkesper@schokokeks.org> - 2021-02-12 11:00 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-02-12 18:00 +0100
    Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Bastian Venthur <venthur@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 10:20 +0100
      Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 19:30 +0100
        Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2021-02-16 20:20 +0100
      Python package situation Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 21:50 +0100
        Re: Python package situation Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 22:20 +0100
          Re: Python package situation Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2021-02-16 23:20 +0100
          Re: Python package situation Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 02:10 +0100
            Re: Python package situation Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 08:00 +0100
            Re: Python package situation Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2021-02-17 10:30 +0100

csiph-web