Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13177

Re: Ressurrecting freevial as the new upstream

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Paul,

> Did you start from the previously existing packaging?

Yes, but I tried debhelper-compat 13 and dh, which failed most
probably due to --fail-missing. Now I tried to keep the former
cdbs-based rules and I got it built, so it looks promising.

> That is what is usually done when reintroducing packages:
> 
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#reintroducing-pkgs

Thanks for the pointer, I was aware of several archived bugs in
freevial but didn't know or remember that the security tracker
was also affected by removals from unstable.

Cheers,
Alex

--
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   Alex Muntada <alexm@debian.org>
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   Debian Developer 🍥 log.alexm.org
  ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Ressurrecting freevial as the new upstream Alex Muntada <alexm@debian.org> - 2021-02-05 18:50 +0100
  Re: Ressurrecting freevial as the new upstream Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> - 2021-02-07 21:00 +0100
  Re: Ressurrecting freevial as the new upstream Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-02-08 08:00 +0100
    Re: Ressurrecting freevial as the new upstream Alex Muntada <alexm@debian.org> - 2021-02-09 00:50 +0100
      Re: Ressurrecting freevial as the new upstream Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-02-09 05:40 +0100

csiph-web