Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12945

Bug#972213: boost1.71: Please indicate some way which python versions you support

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Bug#972213: boost1.71: Please indicate some way which python versions you support
Date Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:10:01 +0200
Message-ID <B0tUl-3wm-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <AZPtT-48k-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <B05Il-5HQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <B0hTb-4CK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AZPtT-48k-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <B0hTb-4CK-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Fri Oct 16 09:03:08 2020
Old-Return-Path <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag NO
X-Spam-Score -4.2
Reply-To Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, 972213@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc Debian Boost Team <team+boost@tracker.debian.org>
X-Debian-Pr-Message followup 972213
X-Debian-Pr-Package boost1.71
X-Debian-Pr-Source boost1.71
X-Spam-Bayes score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 13; hammy, 150; neutral, 135; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*F:U*doko, 0.000-+--autopkgtest, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:einhorn, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:einhorn, 0.000-+--H*r:doko@debian.org
Old-X-Envelope-From doko@debian.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.2
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Debian-Message from BTS
X-Mailing-List <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1627596
List-ID <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 52
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:59:50 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <88c5fe82-4c36-2b1f-deae-f73cbc7f2417@debian.org>
X-Original-References <160268352629.28072.10388202521171168675.reportbug@mail.sceal.ie> <759c67f6-8038-fc16-2a3e-e259dc63609b@debian.org> <9c1ee71f-65bc-ec2c-69c1-b666ecf0575b@debian.org> <160268352629.28072.10388202521171168675.reportbug@mail.sceal.ie> <9c1ee71f-65bc-ec2c-69c1-b666ecf0575b@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1028825 linux.debian.maint.python:12945

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On 10/15/20 10:03 PM, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> On 15/10/2020 08:13, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> Il 14/10/20 15:52, Alastair McKinstry ha scritto:
>>> I maintain the package "ecflow" which uses libboost-python-dev. Now
>>> with the transition to python3.9, ecflow will support (where
>>> possible) multiple python versions. Currently it supports python3.8
>>> but not python3.9 ; this may be fixed in a binNMU or next version,
>>> but I cannot tell whether my failure to build python3.9 support for
>>> ecflow is due to missing py3.9 support in boost, or a bug in my
>>> packaging.
>> BTW, a binNMU was just requested to add Python 3.9 support.
>>
>>> Can some mechanism be added to enable tracability ?
>> In general, Boost supports all the Python versions currently supported
>> by the Python team, except that someone has to file a binNMU for them to
>> appear once a new Python version is packaged. To check which Python
>> versions are supported by a specific package version, it is enough to
>> check the content of the libboost-python1.71.0 package (replace 1.71.0
>> with future versions where applicable):
>>
>> $ dpkg -L libboost-python1.71.0 | grep libboost_python
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_python38.so.1.71.0
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_python39.so.1.71.0
>>
>> (until yesterday you did not have the python39 variant)
>>
>> Does this answer your question?
>>
>> Giovanni.
> 
> Not really. This is probably better discussed on debian-python.
> 
> The point was that there is a lack of a good mechanism to see which packages
> provide py39 support, etc.
> 
> In principle my package ecflow just needs a rebuild after the boost is rebuilt,
> but tracking if this actually works, or add a particular dependency to enable
> automatic rebuild/tracking.

I don't think that packages should care about that at all.  It usually is only
an issue when adding a new python version, and this happens once in a year.  The
transition tracker [1] provides a guidance how to build stuff in which order,
based on dependencies, but doesn't take care about build-dependencies,
autopkgtest dependencies, and dependency cycles.  And binNMUing 600 packages
takes time ...

Matthias

[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.9.html

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#972213: boost1.71: Please indicate some way which python versions you support Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@debian.org> - 2020-10-15 22:20 +0200
  Bug#972213: boost1.71: Please indicate some way which python versions you support Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2020-10-16 11:10 +0200

csiph-web