Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12659
| From | Russell Stuart <russell-debian@stuart.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Bug#938554: RFS: spyne/2.13.15-0.1 [NMU, RC] -- Python library for writing and calling soap web service |
| Date | 2020-06-16 02:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Ai7kS-5PC-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <z8pXY-7fK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ai6oN-5hD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <z8pXY-7fK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ai6oN-5hD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 00:58 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "spyne" which has a > py2removal RC and a grave bug and was autoremoved from testing. The > package is Python 2 only but the current upstream version has Python > 3 support. I converted it to build a binary python3-spyne package. > The bugs are open long enough for a NMU. Dear mentors, Beware if you do NMU this it will be against the wishes of the Debian maintainer for spyne - which is me. The issue is the current stable upstream is does _not_ have Python 3 support. The version of spyne that does have Python3 support "2.13.4- alpha". I personally use spyne in production (which is why I now maintain it). I do my best to avoid running code on my systems that upstream has marked as an alpha release. I plan to package and upload the Python3 version once it is no longer marked as alpha code.
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#938554: RFS: spyne/2.13.15-0.1 [NMU, RC] -- Python library for writing and calling soap web service Russell Stuart <russell-debian@stuart.id.au> - 2020-06-16 02:30 +0200
csiph-web