Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.kde > #10755

Re: Future of Norbert's packages in Debian

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Luc,

the DAMs decision is extremly frustrating for Debian KDE users and given the 
short statement on debian-user

https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2022/01/msg00807.html

it is at least not clear to me if they seriously searched for a solution which 
would have served better all involved parties and the Debian (KDE) users. This 
message even increases the doubt, that searching for such a solution was a 
priority for them

https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2019/01/msg00186.html

I used the ... which the DAMs created in Debian KDE as opportunity and 
installed on a new desktop Manjaro stable instead of Debian to experiment with 
it (I still have Debian bullseye desktops in use). As a Debian stable user I 
considered manjaro more appropriate than Arch.

Kmail 5.19.0/21.12.0 in manjaro stable was a pleasant surprise. Even though it 
is newer than Kmail in Debian unstable, the manjaro stable upgrade to 21.12.1 
is downloaded while I am writting. I am curious to see how this experiment 
goes in the next months in particular the updates. The good thing for Open 
Source users is that we have choice if things go into the wrong direction 
somewhere :-)

Rainer

On Sonntag, 23. Januar 2022 18:56:09 CET Luc Castermans wrote:
> yep.
> 
> For me key is that we loose a very valuable contributor and great
> contribution!    Reasons for this are unclear to me. Why this demotion, are
> those who decide on this stating and communicating their reasons, better is
> this a group decision?
> 
> Luc
> 
> Op zo 23 jan. 2022 13:59 schreef Dietz Proepper <dietz@scanthis.de>:
> > Am Freitag, 21. Januar 2022, 01:11:44 CET schrieb Johannes Zarl-Zierl:
> > > > I never had any issues with Norbert.
> > > 
> > > Full ACK.
> > 
> > +1. And also not with Marco, as far as I remember. Which comes with little
> > relevance, as we did not have much contact before.
> > 
> > > Let's always keep discussions civil and in good faith...
> > 
> > Well, but jftr, let's not forget who started this thread and in which way.
> > At
> > the very least, citing the source of ones comments is quite basic IMNSHO.
> > 
> > Kindest regards,
> > 
> >         Dietz

Back to linux.debian.maint.kde | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Future of "his" packages in Debian Marco Valli <marco@bastardi.net> - 2022-01-20 19:20 +0100
  Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian piorunz <piorunz@gmx.com> - 2022-01-20 23:10 +0100
    Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> - 2022-01-21 00:20 +0100
      Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian Johannes Zarl-Zierl <johannes@zarl-zierl.at> - 2022-01-21 01:40 +0100
        Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian Luc Castermans <luc.castermans@gmail.com> - 2022-01-21 08:00 +0100
        Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian Dietz Proepper <dietz@scanthis.de> - 2022-01-23 14:00 +0100
          Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian Luc Castermans <luc.castermans@gmail.com> - 2022-01-23 19:00 +0100
            Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian Rainer Dorsch <contact@bokomoko.de> - 2022-01-23 21:50 +0100
            Re: Future of Norbert's packages in Debian Rainer Dorsch <ml@bokomoko.de> - 2022-01-23 22:40 +0100
              Re: Future of KDE packages in Debian Aurélien COUDERC <coucouf@debian.org> - 2022-01-23 23:20 +0100
                Re: Future of KDE packages in Debian Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> - 2022-01-24 00:00 +0100
                Re: Future of KDE packages in Debian Dietz Proepper <dietz@scanthis.de> - 2022-01-24 00:40 +0100
                Re: Future of KDE packages in Debian Norbert Preining <norbert@preining.info> - 2022-01-24 01:10 +0100
                Re: Future of KDE packages in Debian Marco Valli <marco@bastardi.net> - 2022-01-24 11:50 +0100
                Re: Future of KDE packages in Debian Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano@tiscali.it> - 2022-01-24 12:00 +0100
                Re: Future of KDE packages in Debian Luc Castermans <luc.castermans@gmail.com> - 2022-01-24 12:20 +0100
                Re: Future of KDE packages in Debian Norbert Preining <norbert@preining.info> - 2022-01-24 14:10 +0100
    Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian Aurélien COUDERC <libre@coucouf.fr> - 2022-01-21 08:20 +0100
      Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian piorunz <piorunz@gmx.com> - 2022-01-22 14:00 +0100
        Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian Luc Castermans <luc.castermans@gmail.com> - 2022-01-22 14:40 +0100
  Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian Dietz Proepper <dietz@scanthis.de> - 2022-01-22 09:50 +0100
    Re: Future of "his" packages in Debian Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2022-01-22 10:40 +0100

csiph-web