Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #66366 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Patrick Schleizer <adrelanos@riseup.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-02-14 12:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2020-02-14 13:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Bug#951315: linux-image-amd64 vs linux-headers-amd64 Debian buster-backports version mismatch bpo.2 vs bpo.3 Patrick Schleizer <adrelanos@riseup.net> - 2020-02-14 12:10 +0100
Bug#951315: marked as done (linux-image-amd64 vs linux-headers-amd64 Debian buster-backports version mismatch bpo.2 vs bpo.3) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2020-02-14 13:50 +0100
| From | Patrick Schleizer <adrelanos@riseup.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-02-14 12:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#951315: linux-image-amd64 vs linux-headers-amd64 Debian buster-backports version mismatch bpo.2 vs bpo.3 |
| Message-ID | <zzH17-6Lx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Package: linux-image-amd64 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: whonix-devel@whonix.org Dear maintainer, package linux-image-amd64 seems to have an outdated dependency. https://packages.debian.org/buster-backports/linux-image-amd64 shows dep: linux-image-5.4.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 (= 5.4.8-1~bpo10+1) https://packages.debian.org/buster-backports/linux-headers-amd64 shows dep: linux-headers-5.4.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 (= 5.4.13-1~bpo10+1) bpo.2 vs bpo.3 I am under the assumption that dependency version of linux-image-amd64 should match dependency version of linux-headers-amd64. In comparsion to buster (non-backports) the version matches. Kindly let me know if that is an unreasonable assumption. Bumped into this issue by running: sudo apt-get -t buster-backports install linux-image-$(dpkg --print-architecture) linux-headers-$(dpkg --print-architecture) and then having DKMS report: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms: Error! Your kernel headers for kernel 5.4.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 cannot be found. Please install the linux-headers-5.4.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 package, or use the --kernelsourcedir option to tell DKMS where it's located Which was unexpected. Cheers, Patrick
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-02-14 13:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#951315: marked as done (linux-image-amd64 vs linux-headers-amd64 Debian buster-backports version mismatch bpo.2 vs bpo.3) |
| Message-ID | <zzIzU-7vX-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #66366 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Your message dated Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:38:41 +0100 with message-id <20200214123841.GA40688@eldamar.local> and subject line Re: Bug#951315: linux-image-amd64 vs linux-headers-amd64 Debian buster-backports version mismatch bpo.2 vs bpo.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #951315, regarding linux-image-amd64 vs linux-headers-amd64 Debian buster-backports version mismatch bpo.2 vs bpo.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 951315: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951315 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web