Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #65855 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-12-11 03:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2020-01-05 20:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 7 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Bug#946569: Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+ Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com> - 2019-12-11 03:30 +0100
Bug#946569: Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+ Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@aol.com> - 2019-12-31 19:00 +0100
Processed: Re: Bug#946569: Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+ "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2020-01-01 20:50 +0100
Bug#946569: Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+ Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2020-01-01 20:50 +0100
Bug#946569: Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+ Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com> - 2020-01-02 02:40 +0100
Processed: Re: Bug#946569: Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+ "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2020-01-01 20:50 +0100
Bug#946569: marked as done (Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2020-01-05 20:10 +0100
| From | Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-12-11 03:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#946569: Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+ |
| Message-ID | <zbZVf-3YQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Source: linux Version: 5.4.2-1~exp1 Severity: normal Hi Debian kernel maintainers, Could you consider enabling EROFS filesystem support as a module from 5.4 for end users now? It has been out of staging. It has much better dynamic performance than squashfs for such like LIVECD use. I'd suggest the following configuration: CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m # CONFIG_EROFS_FS_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_EROFS_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EROFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP=y CONFIG_EROFS_FS_CLUSTER_PAGE_LIMIT=1 erofs-utils package has been available in testing branch as well, https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye/erofs-utils Thanks, Gao Xiang
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-12-31 19:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zjtYe-Dw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #65855 |
Ping... Some hints about this request? On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:12:23AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > Source: linux > Version: 5.4.2-1~exp1 > Severity: normal > > Hi Debian kernel maintainers, > > Could you consider enabling EROFS filesystem support as a module > from 5.4 for end users now? It has been out of staging. > > It has much better dynamic performance than squashfs for such > like LIVECD use. I'd suggest the following configuration: > > CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m > # CONFIG_EROFS_FS_DEBUG is not set > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_XATTR=y > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY=y > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP=y > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_CLUSTER_PAGE_LIMIT=1 > > erofs-utils package has been available in testing branch as well, > https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye/erofs-utils > > Thanks, > Gao Xiang
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-01-01 20:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Processed: Re: Bug#946569: Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+ |
| Message-ID | <zjSad-73P-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #65855 |
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #946569 [src:linux] Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+ Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #946569 to the same tags previously set -- 946569: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946569 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-01-01 20:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zjSad-73P-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #65855 |
Control: tags -1 + pending Hi, On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:12:23AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > Source: linux > Version: 5.4.2-1~exp1 > Severity: normal > > Hi Debian kernel maintainers, > > Could you consider enabling EROFS filesystem support as a module > from 5.4 for end users now? It has been out of staging. > > It has much better dynamic performance than squashfs for such > like LIVECD use. I'd suggest the following configuration: > > CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m > # CONFIG_EROFS_FS_DEBUG is not set > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_XATTR=y > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY=y > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP=y > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_CLUSTER_PAGE_LIMIT=1 > > erofs-utils package has been available in testing branch as well, > https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye/erofs-utils Done in https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/commit/33639568475c399acc9cd9d45e9b06a3a2df6e75 with the suggested configuration. Regards, Salvatore
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-01-02 02:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zjXCW-21b-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #65953 |
Hi Salvatore, On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 08:42:51PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: tags -1 + pending > > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:12:23AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > > Source: linux > > Version: 5.4.2-1~exp1 > > Severity: normal > > > > Hi Debian kernel maintainers, > > > > Could you consider enabling EROFS filesystem support as a module > > from 5.4 for end users now? It has been out of staging. > > > > It has much better dynamic performance than squashfs for such > > like LIVECD use. I'd suggest the following configuration: > > > > CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m > > # CONFIG_EROFS_FS_DEBUG is not set > > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_XATTR=y > > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y > > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY=y > > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP=y > > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_CLUSTER_PAGE_LIMIT=1 > > > > erofs-utils package has been available in testing branch as well, > > https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye/erofs-utils > > Done in > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/commit/33639568475c399acc9cd9d45e9b06a3a2df6e75 > with the suggested configuration. Got it. Thanks for considering this. Thanks, Gao Xiang > > Regards, > Salvatore
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-01-01 20:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Processed: Re: Bug#946569: Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+ |
| Message-ID | <zjSae-73P-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #65855 |
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #946569 [src:linux] Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+ Added tag(s) pending. -- 946569: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946569 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-01-05 20:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#946569: marked as done (Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+) |
| Message-ID | <zljrI-3LO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #65855 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 19:00:11 +0000 with message-id <E1ioB8F-0004xj-BM@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#946569: fixed in linux 5.4.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #946569, regarding Request for CONFIG_EROFS_FS=m on 5.4+ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 946569: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946569 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web