Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #66819 > unrolled thread

Processed: Re: Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?

Started by"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
First post2020-04-18 00:30 +0200
Last post2020-04-18 00:30 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Processed: Re: Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to  a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u? "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2020-04-18 00:30 +0200

#66819 — Processed: Re: Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2020-04-18 00:30 +0200
SubjectProcessed: Re: Bug#822730: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?
Message-ID<zWHEJ-1hT-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 debhelper
Bug #822730 {Done: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>} [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?
Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'debhelper'.
No longer marked as found in versions initramfs-tools/0.125.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #822730 to the same values previously set

-- 
822730: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822730
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web