Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #63730 > unrolled thread

Bug#524458: Still a problem? NFS version?

Started byElliott Mitchell <ehem+debian@m5p.com>
First post2019-03-30 21:00 +0100
Last post2019-03-30 21:00 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#524458: Still a problem?  NFS version? Elliott Mitchell <ehem+debian@m5p.com> - 2019-03-30 21:00 +0100

#63730 — Bug#524458: Still a problem? NFS version?

FromElliott Mitchell <ehem+debian@m5p.com>
Date2019-03-30 21:00 +0100
SubjectBug#524458: Still a problem? NFS version?
Message-ID<xHsj0-3Qe-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
It has been quite some time since there was last any activity on #524458.
Is this problem still occuring for the submitter?  Might it have been
fixed in one of the update rounds?

If this is still a problem, what version of the NFS protocol is in use?
In theory NFSv2 should be able to handle files under 2GB, but perhaps a
limitation of Linux's NFS client or NFS server made a 176MB file be a
problem.  Version 3 of the protocol is widely supportted, I'd suggest
moving to version 3 or version 4 if this mount is still on version 2.


-- 
(\___(\___(\______          --=> 8-) EHM <=--          ______/)___/)___/)
 \BS (    |         ehem+sigmsg@m5p.com  PGP 87145445         |    )   /
  \_CS\   |  _____  -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O-   _____  |   /  _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web