Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #61281 > unrolled thread

linux wrongly treated as passing autopkgtests

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

Contents

  linux wrongly treated as passing autopkgtests Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-06-30 00:30 +0200
    Re: linux wrongly treated as passing autopkgtests Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-06-30 00:40 +0200

#61281 — linux wrongly treated as passing autopkgtests

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Looking at
<https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/l/linux/225215/log.gz>.

I see the result:

    selftests            SKIP Test requires machine-level isolation but testbed does not provide that
    autopkgtest [00:39:46]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary
    selftests            SKIP Test requires machine-level isolation but testbed does not provide that

It would be really good if you could implement machine isolation, but I
understand that it may not be a high priority when so few packages need
it.

However, this appears to be treated as a pass, for testing propagation
purposes.  That's really not right - if a package's tests can't be run,
I think this should be treated the same as a package missing tests.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#61282

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 23:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Looking at
> <https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/l/linux/225215/log.gz>.
> 
> I see the result:
> 
>     selftests            SKIP Test requires machine-level isolation but testbed does not provide that
>     autopkgtest [00:39:46]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary
>     selftests            SKIP Test requires machine-level isolation but testbed does not provide that
> 
> It would be really good if you could implement machine isolation, but I
> understand that it may not be a high priority when so few packages need
> it.
> 
> However, this appears to be treated as a pass, for testing propagation
> purposes.  That's really not right - if a package's tests can't be run,
> I think this should be treated the same as a package missing tests.

dkg pointed me at bug #901847 etc., so there's no need to answer this.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web