Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #60531 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Paul Menzel <pmenzel+bugs.debian.org@molgen.mpg.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-03-23 08:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2018-07-19 02:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Bug#893845: initramfs-tools: Add LZ4 support Paul Menzel <pmenzel+bugs.debian.org@molgen.mpg.de> - 2018-03-23 08:30 +0100
Bug#893845: initramfs-tools: Add LZ4 support Bastian Blank <bblank@thinkmo.de> - 2018-03-23 09:10 +0100
Bug#893845: initramfs-tools: Add LZ4 support Paul Menzel <pmenzel+bugs.debian.org@molgen.mpg.de> - 2018-03-23 09:40 +0100
Bug#893845: marked as done (initramfs-tools: Add LZ4 support) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2018-07-19 02:30 +0200
| From | Paul Menzel <pmenzel+bugs.debian.org@molgen.mpg.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-23 08:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#893845: initramfs-tools: Add LZ4 support |
| Message-ID | <vwpjc-3fZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.130
Severity: wishlist
Dear Debian folks,
It’d be great if you added LZ4 support to initramfs-tools.
There is a patch on Launchpad [1][2], which should apply easily to the
Debian package.
An initramfs image file compressed with `gzip` has a size of 24 MB,
while with an image compressed with `lz4 -9 -l` the size is 38 MB.
On a Dell XPS 13 9370 with an Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8550U CPU @ 1.80GHz
and an NVMe SSD `populate_rootfs` takes 600 ms with the `gzip`
compressed image, while only 190 ms with the `lz4` compressed image.
(Only measured the LZ4 once.)
This can be easily measured by adding `initcall_debug` to the Linux
kernel command line – for example by editing `/etc/default/grub.cfg` and
running `sudo update-grub`. Then, after a reboot, look in the Linux
message with `journalctl -k` or `dmesg` and look for `populate_rootfs`.
As for some users boot speed is quite important, shaving 400 ms off the
boot time is quite nice.
Please tell me, if you need any help with that.
Kind regards,
Paul
[1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1488620
"Add LZ4 support"
[2]:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1488620/comments/5
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bastian Blank <bblank@thinkmo.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-23 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vwpVT-3IM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60531 |
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 08:16:11AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > As for some users boot speed is quite important, shaving 400 ms off the boot > time is quite nice. And then they use BIOS which is aweful slow in disk access, so the time is used instead to actually read the blocks from disk? Bastian -- Dammit Jim, I'm an actor, not a doctor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Menzel <pmenzel+bugs.debian.org@molgen.mpg.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-23 09:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vwqoV-3Wm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60532 |
Dear Bastian, On 03/23/2018 09:07 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 08:16:11AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: >> As for some users boot speed is quite important, shaving 400 ms off the boot >> time is quite nice. > > And then they use BIOS which is aweful slow in disk access, so the time > is used instead to actually read the blocks from disk? Sure, the majority of the systems have that problem of slow firmware, currently it’s UEFI firmware and not the BIOS anymore, and only a few have alternatives like coreboot or U-Boot. I do not see how that is related though to the bug report. But as you brought it up, my Lenovo X60 the coreboot firmware takes less than 500 ms, and on the ASRock E350M1 around one second with SeaBIOS as payload. Additionally, millions of laptops run coreboot on Google Chromebooks and Chromeboxes. So yes, there are devices out there, where you can get boot times to the login screen in well below ten seconds, and it’d be great if developers and users would focus on this issue too, that means, monitor/benchmark/instrument these things, document it, and report bugs and feature requests about this. Kind regards, Paul
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-19 02:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#893845: marked as done (initramfs-tools: Add LZ4 support) |
| Message-ID | <wd4Zs-3yi-53@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60531 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:19:37 +0000 with message-id <E1ffwfR-000BUO-9E@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#893845: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.131 has caused the Debian Bug report #893845, regarding initramfs-tools: Add LZ4 support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 893845: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893845 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web