Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #60411 > unrolled thread

Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM)

Started byAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
First post2018-03-04 21:50 +0100
Last post2019-08-01 00:30 +0200
Articles 18 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-03-04 21:50 +0100
    Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-03-05 15:40 +0100
      Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> - 2018-03-05 17:10 +0100
        Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2018-03-06 02:00 +0100
          Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2018-03-07 05:10 +0100
            Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-03-07 14:10 +0100
            Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-03-07 14:40 +0100
              Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2018-03-07 22:00 +0100
                Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-03-07 23:40 +0100
                  Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2018-03-09 11:00 +0100
                    Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> - 2018-03-09 11:10 +0100
                    Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-03-09 15:40 +0100
                      Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2018-03-11 12:10 +0100
                        Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> - 2018-03-11 12:10 +0100
                          Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2018-03-11 22:10 +0100
                            Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2018-09-10 15:00 +0200
                              Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2019-07-31 16:50 +0200
                                Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2019-08-01 00:30 +0200

#60411 — Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM)

FromAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date2018-03-04 21:50 +0100
SubjectBug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM)
Message-ID<vpIJX-1jS-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 06:41:57PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> A Debian user reported the following issue on QNAP TS-119P II with
> 4.9.65:
> 
> * Menno Finlay-Smits <inbox@menno.io> [2018-01-21 23:08]:
> > Rsyncing files between 2 HDDs on a QNAP 119p with a fresh, minimal install of
> > stretch NAS (armel) causes the kernel to fail after ~20mins with a kernel
> > memory overwrite attempt (full error below). 

Please can you give me the exact rsync command being used. Having a
unix domain socket seems a bit odd for rsync'ing files on the same
machine.

	Thanks
		Andrew

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#60413

FromAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date2018-03-05 15:40 +0100
Message-ID<vpZrr-3Ss-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60411
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 09:41:15PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 06:41:57PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > A Debian user reported the following issue on QNAP TS-119P II with
> > 4.9.65:
> > 
> > * Menno Finlay-Smits <inbox@menno.io> [2018-01-21 23:08]:
> > > Rsyncing files between 2 HDDs on a QNAP 119p with a fresh, minimal install of
> > > stretch NAS (armel) causes the kernel to fail after ~20mins with a kernel
> > > memory overwrite attempt (full error below). 
> 
> Please can you give me the exact rsync command being used. Having a
> unix domain socket seems a bit odd for rsync'ing files on the same
> machine.

I played with this a bit. When you rsync with both source and target
on the same machine, it appears to fork two processes, and connect
them together via a unix domain socket.

I tried reproducing this with 4.9.86. I used the command

rsync -az /home /root/home

which copied 12G of data. No problems seen. But this is one disk. I
assume the machine giving the problem has one of the disks as USB,
since the QNAP TS-119P II is a single bay NAS. So it could be the USB
disk is slower than the internal disk, and there is a backlog building
up. First a backlog for writing out to the disk, then a backlog
forming on the Unix domain socket? So maybe that is why i cannot
reproduce it. Or the problem has been fixed between 4.9.65 and 4.9.86.

Would it be possible to try to reproduce this problem with 4.9.86 on
the hardware reporting the issue?

Thanks
	Andrew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60414

FromYves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
Date2018-03-05 17:10 +0100
Message-ID<vq0Qy-4Y3-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60413

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 15:28 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Would it be possible to try to reproduce this problem with 4.9.86 on
> the hardware reporting the issue?

4.9.82-1+deb9u3 is currently in the archive. Menno, could you give it a shot?

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60418

From"Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io>
Date2018-03-06 02:00 +0100
Message-ID<vq97r-22D-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60414
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, at 04:57, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 15:28 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Would it be possible to try to reproduce this problem with 4.9.86 on
> > the hardware reporting the issue?
> 
> 4.9.82-1+deb9u3 is currently in the archive. Menno, could you give it a shot?

Will do. I need to get the NAS back to running Scratch as I went back to Jessie for comparison (similar looking problems there too) but I'll get it done as soon as I can.

Also, I can confirm that I was indeed copying from an external USB disk with just "rsync -av <source> <dest>".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60420

From"Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io>
Date2018-03-07 05:10 +0100
Message-ID<vqyyS-3mz-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60418
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, at 13:54, Menno Finlay-Smits wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, at 04:57, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 15:28 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Would it be possible to try to reproduce this problem with 4.9.86 on
> > > the hardware reporting the issue?
> > 
> > 4.9.82-1+deb9u3 is currently in the archive. Menno, could you give it a shot?
> 
> Will do. I need to get the NAS back to running Scratch as I went back to 
> Jessie for comparison (similar looking problems there too) but I'll get 
> it done as soon as I can.
> 
> Also, I can confirm that I was indeed copying from an external USB disk 
> with just "rsync -av <source> <dest>".

The problem still happens with 4.9.82-1+deb9u3.

Here's the dump:

[  675.800163] usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected to c08f83a0 (<wrapped address>) (4294933600 bytes)
[  675.810513] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  675.815144] kernel BUG at /build/linux-nLLkbA/linux-4.9.82/mm/usercopy.c:75!
[  675.822215] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] ARM
[  675.827020] Modules linked in: ses enclosure scsi_transport_sas uas usb_storage marvell ehci_orion mv643xx_eth mvmdio of_mdio ehci_hcd fixed_phy marvell_cesa libphy des_generic xhci_pci xhci_hcd sg usbcore orion_wdt usb_common m25p80 spi_nor kirkwood_thermal evdev gpio_keys sunrpc ip_tables x_tables ipv6 autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 crc32c_generic fscrypto ecb mbcache sd_mod sata_mv libata scsi_mod
[  675.862376] CPU: 0 PID: 2050 Comm: rsync Not tainted 4.9.0-6-marvell #1 Debian 4.9.82-1+deb9u3
[  675.871022] Hardware name: Marvell Kirkwood (Flattened Device Tree)
[  675.877310] task: c0af32c0 task.stack: c0a7e000
[  675.881857] PC is at __check_object_size+0x120/0x1d8
[  675.886840] LR is at __check_object_size+0x120/0x1d8
[  675.891821] pc : [<c0111d84>]    lr : [<c0111d84>]    psr: 60000013
               sp : c0a7fdb8  ip : 00000000  fp : c0a7ff08
[  675.903339] r10: c0a7e000  r9 : ffff7c60  r8 : c08f83a0
[  675.908579] r7 : c08f0000  r6 : 00000000  r5 : ffff7c60  r4 : c08f83a0
[  675.915128] r3 : c0555080  r2 : c055a3a4  r1 : c05509f0  r0 : 00000065
[  675.921677] Flags: nZCv  IRQs on  FIQs on  Mode SVC_32  ISA ARM  Segment none
[  675.928835] Control: 0005397f  Table: 00b44000  DAC: 00000051
[  675.934599] Process rsync (pid: 2050, stack limit = 0xc0a7e190)
[  675.940538] Stack: (0xc0a7fdb8 to 0xc0a80000)
[  675.944908] fda0:                                                       c04634c4 ffff7c60
[  675.953116] fdc0: 000103a8 ffff7c60 00008000 c0a7fec0 c08f83a0 c0202dd0 00000008 00cfbff0
[  675.961329] fde0: dfc09d00 c08e8000 00000051 00000008 c0a7fec0 00008000 00000008 00000008
[  675.969535] fe00: 00008000 00000000 dead4e40 00008008 c0496ed1 c02fcf5c dead4e40 c0a7fec0
[  675.977749] fe20: c0a7fec0 00000000 00008008 dead4e40 c08be920 c0a7feb8 00000001 00000000
[  675.985964] fe40: c08beb60 c03a2f80 c0a7fe64 00000003 dec8e2e0 00008000 00000008 00008008
[  675.994178] fe60: 5a9f1704 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff ffffffff 00000000
[  676.002392] fe80: c0ace700 c0a7feb8 dec8e2e0 dec8e2e0 c0a892a0 00cebc48 c0a7e000 00000000
[  676.010607] fea0: 00511e6c c02ef4a8 c0a7ff10 c0a7ff28 dec8e2e0 c02ef548 00000000 00000000
[  676.018821] fec0: 00000001 00000008 00008000 c0a7ff08 00000001 3b9a9904 00000000 00000000
[  676.027035] fee0: 00000040 c0a7ff28 00000000 00000000 c0a892a0 c0a7ff88 00008008 c01144c0
[  676.035249] ff00: 00008008 00000000 00cebc48 00008008 00000001 00000000 00008008 c0a7ff08
[  676.043454] ff20: 00000001 3b9a9904 c0a892a0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[  676.051660] ff40: 00000000 00000000 00000000 c0a892a0 00008008 00000000 c0a7ff88 c011512c
[  676.059865] ff60: c0a892a0 00cebc48 00008008 c0a892a0 c0a892a0 00cebc48 00008008 c000f724
[  676.068071] ff80: c0a7e000 c0115fe0 00000000 00000000 00008008 00511e6c bef86848 bef867c8
[  676.076277] ffa0: 00000004 c000f560 00511e6c bef86848 00000004 00cebc48 00008008 00cebc48
[  676.084490] ffc0: 00511e6c bef86848 bef867c8 00000004 0051fa80 00511e84 0050f95c 00511e6c
[  676.092696] ffe0: 00000000 bef8666c 004c5978 b6ef7d1c 40000010 00000004 1fffd871 1fffdc71
[  676.100910] [<c0111d84>] (__check_object_size) from [<c0202dd0>] (copy_page_from_iter+0x2e8/0x3d0)
[  676.109915] [<c0202dd0>] (copy_page_from_iter) from [<c02fcf5c>] (skb_copy_datagram_from_iter+0xfc/0x188)
[  676.119524] [<c02fcf5c>] (skb_copy_datagram_from_iter) from [<c03a2f80>] (unix_stream_sendmsg+0x208/0x2f8)
[  676.129218] [<c03a2f80>] (unix_stream_sendmsg) from [<c02ef4a8>] (sock_sendmsg+0x3c/0x50)
[  676.137430] [<c02ef4a8>] (sock_sendmsg) from [<c02ef548>] (sock_write_iter+0x8c/0xb4)
[  676.145297] [<c02ef548>] (sock_write_iter) from [<c01144c0>] (new_sync_write+0xc0/0xe4)
[  676.153337] [<c01144c0>] (new_sync_write) from [<c011512c>] (vfs_write+0xc0/0x194)
[  676.160941] [<c011512c>] (vfs_write) from [<c0115fe0>] (SyS_write+0x44/0x7c)
[  676.168023] [<c0115fe0>] (SyS_write) from [<c000f560>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x44)
[  676.175625] Code: e59f10a0 01a01000 e59f009c ebff0495 (e7f001f2)
[  676.181748] ---[ end trace 09357b62c70de3ea ]---

What else can I try? There doesn't appear to be a newer kernel in proposed right now.

- Menno

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60422

FromAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date2018-03-07 14:10 +0100
Message-ID<vqGZr-K2-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60420
> What else can I try? There doesn't appear to be a newer kernel in
> proposed right now.

Are you happy to apply patches, build a kernel, and test it?

Thanks
    Andrew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60423

FromAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date2018-03-07 14:40 +0100
Message-ID<vqHst-Ur-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60420
> What else can I try?

Do you have transparent huge pages enabled?

~$ cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled 
[always] madvise never

If so, could you disable it with:

echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled

and run your rsync command.

Thanks
	Andrew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60425

From"Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io>
Date2018-03-07 22:00 +0100
Message-ID<vqOkh-5jj-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60423
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, at 02:36, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > What else can I try?
> 
> Do you have transparent huge pages enabled?
> 
> ~$ cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled 
> [always] madvise never
> 
> If so, could you disable it with:
> 
> echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled
> 
> and run your rsync command.

I'll check this at the next opportunity. 

Also, I'm comfortable with patching and compiling kernels if necessary.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60426

FromAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date2018-03-07 23:40 +0100
Message-ID<vqPT3-6z0-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60425
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:49:29AM +1300, Menno Finlay-Smits wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, at 02:36, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > What else can I try?
> > 
> > Do you have transparent huge pages enabled?
> > 
> > ~$ cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled 
> > [always] madvise never
> > 
> > If so, could you disable it with:
> > 
> > echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled
> > 
> > and run your rsync command.

Hi Menno

Could you also try linux-image-4.14.0-3-marvell from sid?

There does not appear to be a 4.15 yet for marvell.

      Andrew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60436

From"Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io>
Date2018-03-09 11:00 +0100
Message-ID<vrmYF-3fV-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60426

On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, at 11:27, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:49:29AM +1300, Menno Finlay-Smits wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, at 02:36, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > What else can I try?
> > > 
> > > Do you have transparent huge pages enabled?
> > > 
> > > ~$ cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled 
> > > [always] madvise never
> > > 
> > > If so, could you disable it with:
> > > 
> > > echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled
> > > 
> > > and run your rsync command.
> 
> Hi Menno
> 
> Could you also try linux-image-4.14.0-3-marvell from sid?

Can do. Should I just use the kernel packages from sid or update the whole system to sid?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60437

FromYves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
Date2018-03-09 11:10 +0100
Message-ID<vrn8l-3By-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60436

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:53:07PM +1300, Menno Finlay-Smits wrote:
> Can do. Should I just use the kernel packages from sid or update the whole system to sid?

I think you should be able to just pick the kernel from sid.

I'm starting to work on updating 4.9 to later kernels but it's not
really a priority right now since we'll just have a point release this
week-end.

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis Perez

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60438

FromAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date2018-03-09 15:40 +0100
Message-ID<vrrlE-6iv-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60436
> > Hi Menno
> > 
> > Could you also try linux-image-4.14.0-3-marvell from sid?
> 
> Can do. Should I just use the kernel packages from sid or update the whole system to sid?

Hi Menno

The kernel packages should be sufficient.

    Andrew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60444

From"Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io>
Date2018-03-11 12:10 +0100
Message-ID<vs71v-7uM-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60438
> > > Could you also try linux-image-4.14.0-3-marvell from sid?
> > 
> > Can do. Should I just use the kernel packages from sid or update the whole system to sid?
> 
> Hi Menno
> 
> The kernel packages should be sufficient.

Bingo. The problem doesn't seem to happen using linux-image-4.14.0-3-marvell_4.14.17-1 from sid. I've now successfully transferred 1.5TB from an external USB drive onto the internal hard disk. Previously the problem would show up within the first few 100MB of the transfer.

Do you want me to help figure out which change to the kernel fixed the problem?

- Menno

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60445

FromYves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
Date2018-03-11 12:10 +0100
Message-ID<vs71w-7uM-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60444

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 00:02 +1300, Menno Finlay-Smits wrote:
> Bingo. The problem doesn't seem to happen using linux-image-4.14.0-3-
> marvell_4.14.17-1 from sid. I've now successfully transferred 1.5TB from an
> external USB drive onto the internal hard disk. Previously the problem would
> show up within the first few 100MB of the transfer.
> 
> Do you want me to help figure out which change to the kernel fixed the
> problem?

As far as I can tell and if I'm not mistaken, the fix is already identified
and is included in 4.9.86.

I've started working on it for Stretch, and at one point it will be uploaded
to -proposed-updates for inclusion in the next point release (9.5). When it's
done I'll probably ask you to try a test kernel to make sure it's really
fixed.

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#60454

From"Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io>
Date2018-03-11 22:10 +0100
Message-ID<vsgoa-62G-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60445
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018, at 00:06, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 00:02 +1300, Menno Finlay-Smits wrote:
> > Do you want me to help figure out which change to the kernel fixed the
> > problem?
> 
> As far as I can tell and if I'm not mistaken, the fix is already identified
> and is included in 4.9.86.
> 
> I've started working on it for Stretch, and at one point it will be uploaded
> to -proposed-updates for inclusion in the next point release (9.5). When it's
> done I'll probably ask you to try a test kernel to make sure it's really
> fixed.

I'm happy to try it out when it's available.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#62073

FromMartin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date2018-09-10 15:00 +0200
Message-ID<wwtXk-6uY-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#60454
* Menno Finlay-Smits <inbox@menno.io> [2018-03-12 09:59]:
> > > Do you want me to help figure out which change to the kernel fixed the
> > > problem?
> > 
> > As far as I can tell and if I'm not mistaken, the fix is already identified
> > and is included in 4.9.86.
> > 
> > I've started working on it for Stretch, and at one point it will be uploaded
> > to -proposed-updates for inclusion in the next point release (9.5). When it's
> > done I'll probably ask you to try a test kernel to make sure it's really
> > fixed.
> 
> I'm happy to try it out when it's available.

Any update on this?  Debian stable has 4.9.110-1 now.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
https://www.cyrius.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#64619

FromMartin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date2019-07-31 16:50 +0200
Message-ID<ypY5r-2vi-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#62073
* Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> [2018-09-10 14:27]:
> > > > Do you want me to help figure out which change to the kernel fixed the
> > > > problem?
> > > 
> > > As far as I can tell and if I'm not mistaken, the fix is already identified
> > > and is included in 4.9.86.
> > > 
> > > I've started working on it for Stretch, and at one point it will be uploaded
> > > to -proposed-updates for inclusion in the next point release (9.5). When it's
> > > done I'll probably ask you to try a test kernel to make sure it's really
> > > fixed.
> > 
> > I'm happy to try it out when it's available.
> 
> Any update on this?  Debian stable has 4.9.110-1 now.

Menno, any chance you can test if your problem has gone away?

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
https://www.cyrius.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#64622

From"Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io>
Date2019-08-01 00:30 +0200
Message-ID<yq5gB-77j-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#64619
Not really sorry. I'm not using this hardware any more.

On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, at 02:37, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> [2018-09-10 14:27]:
> > > > > Do you want me to help figure out which change to the kernel fixed the
> > > > > problem?
> > > > 
> > > > As far as I can tell and if I'm not mistaken, the fix is already identified
> > > > and is included in 4.9.86.
> > > > 
> > > > I've started working on it for Stretch, and at one point it will be uploaded
> > > > to -proposed-updates for inclusion in the next point release (9.5). When it's
> > > > done I'll probably ask you to try a test kernel to make sure it's really
> > > > fixed.
> > > 
> > > I'm happy to try it out when it's available.
> > 
> > Any update on this?  Debian stable has 4.9.110-1 now.
> 
> Menno, any chance you can test if your problem has gone away?
> 
> -- 
> Martin Michlmayr
> https://www.cyrius.com/
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web