Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #60411 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-03-04 21:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2019-08-01 00:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 18 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-03-04 21:50 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-03-05 15:40 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> - 2018-03-05 17:10 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2018-03-06 02:00 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2018-03-07 05:10 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-03-07 14:10 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-03-07 14:40 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2018-03-07 22:00 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-03-07 23:40 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2018-03-09 11:00 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> - 2018-03-09 11:10 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2018-03-09 15:40 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2018-03-11 12:10 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> - 2018-03-11 12:10 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2018-03-11 22:10 +0100
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2018-09-10 15:00 +0200
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2019-07-31 16:50 +0200
Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> - 2019-08-01 00:30 +0200
| From | Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 21:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#887873: linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM) |
| Message-ID | <vpIJX-1jS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 06:41:57PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > A Debian user reported the following issue on QNAP TS-119P II with > 4.9.65: > > * Menno Finlay-Smits <inbox@menno.io> [2018-01-21 23:08]: > > Rsyncing files between 2 HDDs on a QNAP 119p with a fresh, minimal install of > > stretch NAS (armel) causes the kernel to fail after ~20mins with a kernel > > memory overwrite attempt (full error below). Please can you give me the exact rsync command being used. Having a unix domain socket seems a bit odd for rsync'ing files on the same machine. Thanks Andrew
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vpZrr-3Ss-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60411 |
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 09:41:15PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 06:41:57PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > A Debian user reported the following issue on QNAP TS-119P II with > > 4.9.65: > > > > * Menno Finlay-Smits <inbox@menno.io> [2018-01-21 23:08]: > > > Rsyncing files between 2 HDDs on a QNAP 119p with a fresh, minimal install of > > > stretch NAS (armel) causes the kernel to fail after ~20mins with a kernel > > > memory overwrite attempt (full error below). > > Please can you give me the exact rsync command being used. Having a > unix domain socket seems a bit odd for rsync'ing files on the same > machine. I played with this a bit. When you rsync with both source and target on the same machine, it appears to fork two processes, and connect them together via a unix domain socket. I tried reproducing this with 4.9.86. I used the command rsync -az /home /root/home which copied 12G of data. No problems seen. But this is one disk. I assume the machine giving the problem has one of the disks as USB, since the QNAP TS-119P II is a single bay NAS. So it could be the USB disk is slower than the internal disk, and there is a backlog building up. First a backlog for writing out to the disk, then a backlog forming on the Unix domain socket? So maybe that is why i cannot reproduce it. Or the problem has been fixed between 4.9.65 and 4.9.86. Would it be possible to try to reproduce this problem with 4.9.86 on the hardware reporting the issue? Thanks Andrew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 17:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vq0Qy-4Y3-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60413 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 15:28 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > Would it be possible to try to reproduce this problem with 4.9.86 on > the hardware reporting the issue? 4.9.82-1+deb9u3 is currently in the archive. Menno, could you give it a shot? Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-06 02:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vq97r-22D-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60414 |
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, at 04:57, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 15:28 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Would it be possible to try to reproduce this problem with 4.9.86 on > > the hardware reporting the issue? > > 4.9.82-1+deb9u3 is currently in the archive. Menno, could you give it a shot? Will do. I need to get the NAS back to running Scratch as I went back to Jessie for comparison (similar looking problems there too) but I'll get it done as soon as I can. Also, I can confirm that I was indeed copying from an external USB disk with just "rsync -av <source> <dest>".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-07 05:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vqyyS-3mz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60418 |
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, at 13:54, Menno Finlay-Smits wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, at 04:57, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 15:28 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Would it be possible to try to reproduce this problem with 4.9.86 on
> > > the hardware reporting the issue?
> >
> > 4.9.82-1+deb9u3 is currently in the archive. Menno, could you give it a shot?
>
> Will do. I need to get the NAS back to running Scratch as I went back to
> Jessie for comparison (similar looking problems there too) but I'll get
> it done as soon as I can.
>
> Also, I can confirm that I was indeed copying from an external USB disk
> with just "rsync -av <source> <dest>".
The problem still happens with 4.9.82-1+deb9u3.
Here's the dump:
[ 675.800163] usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected to c08f83a0 (<wrapped address>) (4294933600 bytes)
[ 675.810513] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 675.815144] kernel BUG at /build/linux-nLLkbA/linux-4.9.82/mm/usercopy.c:75!
[ 675.822215] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] ARM
[ 675.827020] Modules linked in: ses enclosure scsi_transport_sas uas usb_storage marvell ehci_orion mv643xx_eth mvmdio of_mdio ehci_hcd fixed_phy marvell_cesa libphy des_generic xhci_pci xhci_hcd sg usbcore orion_wdt usb_common m25p80 spi_nor kirkwood_thermal evdev gpio_keys sunrpc ip_tables x_tables ipv6 autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 crc32c_generic fscrypto ecb mbcache sd_mod sata_mv libata scsi_mod
[ 675.862376] CPU: 0 PID: 2050 Comm: rsync Not tainted 4.9.0-6-marvell #1 Debian 4.9.82-1+deb9u3
[ 675.871022] Hardware name: Marvell Kirkwood (Flattened Device Tree)
[ 675.877310] task: c0af32c0 task.stack: c0a7e000
[ 675.881857] PC is at __check_object_size+0x120/0x1d8
[ 675.886840] LR is at __check_object_size+0x120/0x1d8
[ 675.891821] pc : [<c0111d84>] lr : [<c0111d84>] psr: 60000013
sp : c0a7fdb8 ip : 00000000 fp : c0a7ff08
[ 675.903339] r10: c0a7e000 r9 : ffff7c60 r8 : c08f83a0
[ 675.908579] r7 : c08f0000 r6 : 00000000 r5 : ffff7c60 r4 : c08f83a0
[ 675.915128] r3 : c0555080 r2 : c055a3a4 r1 : c05509f0 r0 : 00000065
[ 675.921677] Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none
[ 675.928835] Control: 0005397f Table: 00b44000 DAC: 00000051
[ 675.934599] Process rsync (pid: 2050, stack limit = 0xc0a7e190)
[ 675.940538] Stack: (0xc0a7fdb8 to 0xc0a80000)
[ 675.944908] fda0: c04634c4 ffff7c60
[ 675.953116] fdc0: 000103a8 ffff7c60 00008000 c0a7fec0 c08f83a0 c0202dd0 00000008 00cfbff0
[ 675.961329] fde0: dfc09d00 c08e8000 00000051 00000008 c0a7fec0 00008000 00000008 00000008
[ 675.969535] fe00: 00008000 00000000 dead4e40 00008008 c0496ed1 c02fcf5c dead4e40 c0a7fec0
[ 675.977749] fe20: c0a7fec0 00000000 00008008 dead4e40 c08be920 c0a7feb8 00000001 00000000
[ 675.985964] fe40: c08beb60 c03a2f80 c0a7fe64 00000003 dec8e2e0 00008000 00000008 00008008
[ 675.994178] fe60: 5a9f1704 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff ffffffff 00000000
[ 676.002392] fe80: c0ace700 c0a7feb8 dec8e2e0 dec8e2e0 c0a892a0 00cebc48 c0a7e000 00000000
[ 676.010607] fea0: 00511e6c c02ef4a8 c0a7ff10 c0a7ff28 dec8e2e0 c02ef548 00000000 00000000
[ 676.018821] fec0: 00000001 00000008 00008000 c0a7ff08 00000001 3b9a9904 00000000 00000000
[ 676.027035] fee0: 00000040 c0a7ff28 00000000 00000000 c0a892a0 c0a7ff88 00008008 c01144c0
[ 676.035249] ff00: 00008008 00000000 00cebc48 00008008 00000001 00000000 00008008 c0a7ff08
[ 676.043454] ff20: 00000001 3b9a9904 c0a892a0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[ 676.051660] ff40: 00000000 00000000 00000000 c0a892a0 00008008 00000000 c0a7ff88 c011512c
[ 676.059865] ff60: c0a892a0 00cebc48 00008008 c0a892a0 c0a892a0 00cebc48 00008008 c000f724
[ 676.068071] ff80: c0a7e000 c0115fe0 00000000 00000000 00008008 00511e6c bef86848 bef867c8
[ 676.076277] ffa0: 00000004 c000f560 00511e6c bef86848 00000004 00cebc48 00008008 00cebc48
[ 676.084490] ffc0: 00511e6c bef86848 bef867c8 00000004 0051fa80 00511e84 0050f95c 00511e6c
[ 676.092696] ffe0: 00000000 bef8666c 004c5978 b6ef7d1c 40000010 00000004 1fffd871 1fffdc71
[ 676.100910] [<c0111d84>] (__check_object_size) from [<c0202dd0>] (copy_page_from_iter+0x2e8/0x3d0)
[ 676.109915] [<c0202dd0>] (copy_page_from_iter) from [<c02fcf5c>] (skb_copy_datagram_from_iter+0xfc/0x188)
[ 676.119524] [<c02fcf5c>] (skb_copy_datagram_from_iter) from [<c03a2f80>] (unix_stream_sendmsg+0x208/0x2f8)
[ 676.129218] [<c03a2f80>] (unix_stream_sendmsg) from [<c02ef4a8>] (sock_sendmsg+0x3c/0x50)
[ 676.137430] [<c02ef4a8>] (sock_sendmsg) from [<c02ef548>] (sock_write_iter+0x8c/0xb4)
[ 676.145297] [<c02ef548>] (sock_write_iter) from [<c01144c0>] (new_sync_write+0xc0/0xe4)
[ 676.153337] [<c01144c0>] (new_sync_write) from [<c011512c>] (vfs_write+0xc0/0x194)
[ 676.160941] [<c011512c>] (vfs_write) from [<c0115fe0>] (SyS_write+0x44/0x7c)
[ 676.168023] [<c0115fe0>] (SyS_write) from [<c000f560>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x44)
[ 676.175625] Code: e59f10a0 01a01000 e59f009c ebff0495 (e7f001f2)
[ 676.181748] ---[ end trace 09357b62c70de3ea ]---
What else can I try? There doesn't appear to be a newer kernel in proposed right now.
- Menno
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-07 14:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vqGZr-K2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60420 |
> What else can I try? There doesn't appear to be a newer kernel in
> proposed right now.
Are you happy to apply patches, build a kernel, and test it?
Thanks
Andrew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-07 14:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vqHst-Ur-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60420 |
> What else can I try? Do you have transparent huge pages enabled? ~$ cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled [always] madvise never If so, could you disable it with: echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled and run your rsync command. Thanks Andrew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-07 22:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vqOkh-5jj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60423 |
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, at 02:36, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > What else can I try? > > Do you have transparent huge pages enabled? > > ~$ cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled > [always] madvise never > > If so, could you disable it with: > > echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled > > and run your rsync command. I'll check this at the next opportunity. Also, I'm comfortable with patching and compiling kernels if necessary.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-07 23:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vqPT3-6z0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60425 |
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:49:29AM +1300, Menno Finlay-Smits wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, at 02:36, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > What else can I try?
> >
> > Do you have transparent huge pages enabled?
> >
> > ~$ cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled
> > [always] madvise never
> >
> > If so, could you disable it with:
> >
> > echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled
> >
> > and run your rsync command.
Hi Menno
Could you also try linux-image-4.14.0-3-marvell from sid?
There does not appear to be a 4.15 yet for marvell.
Andrew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-09 11:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vrmYF-3fV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60426 |
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, at 11:27, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:49:29AM +1300, Menno Finlay-Smits wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, at 02:36, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > What else can I try? > > > > > > Do you have transparent huge pages enabled? > > > > > > ~$ cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled > > > [always] madvise never > > > > > > If so, could you disable it with: > > > > > > echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled > > > > > > and run your rsync command. > > Hi Menno > > Could you also try linux-image-4.14.0-3-marvell from sid? Can do. Should I just use the kernel packages from sid or update the whole system to sid?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-09 11:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vrn8l-3By-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60436 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:53:07PM +1300, Menno Finlay-Smits wrote: > Can do. Should I just use the kernel packages from sid or update the whole system to sid? I think you should be able to just pick the kernel from sid. I'm starting to work on updating 4.9 to later kernels but it's not really a priority right now since we'll just have a point release this week-end. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis Perez
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-09 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vrrlE-6iv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60436 |
> > Hi Menno
> >
> > Could you also try linux-image-4.14.0-3-marvell from sid?
>
> Can do. Should I just use the kernel packages from sid or update the whole system to sid?
Hi Menno
The kernel packages should be sufficient.
Andrew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-11 12:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vs71v-7uM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60438 |
> > > Could you also try linux-image-4.14.0-3-marvell from sid? > > > > Can do. Should I just use the kernel packages from sid or update the whole system to sid? > > Hi Menno > > The kernel packages should be sufficient. Bingo. The problem doesn't seem to happen using linux-image-4.14.0-3-marvell_4.14.17-1 from sid. I've now successfully transferred 1.5TB from an external USB drive onto the internal hard disk. Previously the problem would show up within the first few 100MB of the transfer. Do you want me to help figure out which change to the kernel fixed the problem? - Menno
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-11 12:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vs71w-7uM-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60444 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 00:02 +1300, Menno Finlay-Smits wrote: > Bingo. The problem doesn't seem to happen using linux-image-4.14.0-3- > marvell_4.14.17-1 from sid. I've now successfully transferred 1.5TB from an > external USB drive onto the internal hard disk. Previously the problem would > show up within the first few 100MB of the transfer. > > Do you want me to help figure out which change to the kernel fixed the > problem? As far as I can tell and if I'm not mistaken, the fix is already identified and is included in 4.9.86. I've started working on it for Stretch, and at one point it will be uploaded to -proposed-updates for inclusion in the next point release (9.5). When it's done I'll probably ask you to try a test kernel to make sure it's really fixed. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-11 22:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vsgoa-62G-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60445 |
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018, at 00:06, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 00:02 +1300, Menno Finlay-Smits wrote: > > Do you want me to help figure out which change to the kernel fixed the > > problem? > > As far as I can tell and if I'm not mistaken, the fix is already identified > and is included in 4.9.86. > > I've started working on it for Stretch, and at one point it will be uploaded > to -proposed-updates for inclusion in the next point release (9.5). When it's > done I'll probably ask you to try a test kernel to make sure it's really > fixed. I'm happy to try it out when it's available.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wwtXk-6uY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60454 |
* Menno Finlay-Smits <inbox@menno.io> [2018-03-12 09:59]: > > > Do you want me to help figure out which change to the kernel fixed the > > > problem? > > > > As far as I can tell and if I'm not mistaken, the fix is already identified > > and is included in 4.9.86. > > > > I've started working on it for Stretch, and at one point it will be uploaded > > to -proposed-updates for inclusion in the next point release (9.5). When it's > > done I'll probably ask you to try a test kernel to make sure it's really > > fixed. > > I'm happy to try it out when it's available. Any update on this? Debian stable has 4.9.110-1 now. -- Martin Michlmayr https://www.cyrius.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-31 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ypY5r-2vi-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #62073 |
* Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> [2018-09-10 14:27]: > > > > Do you want me to help figure out which change to the kernel fixed the > > > > problem? > > > > > > As far as I can tell and if I'm not mistaken, the fix is already identified > > > and is included in 4.9.86. > > > > > > I've started working on it for Stretch, and at one point it will be uploaded > > > to -proposed-updates for inclusion in the next point release (9.5). When it's > > > done I'll probably ask you to try a test kernel to make sure it's really > > > fixed. > > > > I'm happy to try it out when it's available. > > Any update on this? Debian stable has 4.9.110-1 now. Menno, any chance you can test if your problem has gone away? -- Martin Michlmayr https://www.cyrius.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Menno Finlay-Smits" <inbox@menno.io> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-08-01 00:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yq5gB-77j-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #64619 |
Not really sorry. I'm not using this hardware any more. On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, at 02:37, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> [2018-09-10 14:27]: > > > > > Do you want me to help figure out which change to the kernel fixed the > > > > > problem? > > > > > > > > As far as I can tell and if I'm not mistaken, the fix is already identified > > > > and is included in 4.9.86. > > > > > > > > I've started working on it for Stretch, and at one point it will be uploaded > > > > to -proposed-updates for inclusion in the next point release (9.5). When it's > > > > done I'll probably ask you to try a test kernel to make sure it's really > > > > fixed. > > > > > > I'm happy to try it out when it's available. > > > > Any update on this? Debian stable has 4.9.110-1 now. > > Menno, any chance you can test if your problem has gone away? > > -- > Martin Michlmayr > https://www.cyrius.com/ >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web