Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #60269 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-02-21 19:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2019-07-08 04:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Bug#891038: Please document "cloud" variant differences in the description Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2018-02-21 19:50 +0100
Bug#891038: Please? Dean Hamstead <dean@bytefoundry.com.au> - 2019-07-08 04:10 +0200
| From | Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-02-21 19:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#891038: Please document "cloud" variant differences in the description |
| Message-ID | <vlHCN-20X-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Package: linux-image-cloud-amd64 Severity: wishlist The description of linux-image-cloud-amd64 just says: This package depends on the latest Linux kernel and modules for use on Amazon EC2, Google Compute Engine and Microsoft Azure cloud platforms. ▒ Please document, in the package description, the key configuration differences between the cloud variant and the baseline kernel. What makes it more suitable for cloud platforms, what's the general theme of what it changes, what do you gain by running a cloud kernel, what happens if you try to run a cloud kernel on a native platform, etc.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dean Hamstead <dean@bytefoundry.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-07-08 04:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#891038: Please? |
| Message-ID | <yhrgl-EK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #60269 |
This would be very handy. Please please?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web