Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #61101 > unrolled thread

Bug#900171: firmware-free: Recommend or Suggest firmware-ath9k-htc

Started byJohn Scott <jscott@posteo.net>
First post2018-05-27 05:50 +0200
Last post2021-01-14 18:10 +0100
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel


Contents

  Bug#900171: firmware-free: Recommend or Suggest firmware-ath9k-htc John Scott <jscott@posteo.net> - 2018-05-27 05:50 +0200
    Bug#900171: Downstreams affected by absence of firmware-ath9k-htc John Scott <jscott@posteo.net> - 2021-01-14 18:10 +0100

#61101 — Bug#900171: firmware-free: Recommend or Suggest firmware-ath9k-htc

FromJohn Scott <jscott@posteo.net>
Date2018-05-27 05:50 +0200
SubjectBug#900171: firmware-free: Recommend or Suggest firmware-ath9k-htc
Message-ID<vTUQV-3BL-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Source: firmware-free
Version: 3.4
Severity: wishlist

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

firmware-ath9k-htc provides free firmware for ar9271 and
ar7010 Wi-Fi chipsets and is necessary for the hardware to
work with free software. Unlike firmware-free (#890601),
the firmware-ath9k-htc package is unique in that the
firmware is built from source with the package, which is
neat.

IMHO, moving the firmware into firmware-linux-free is
unnecessary and a bit of a step backwards, but it should be
included by default just as other free firmware is with Debian.
That is why I suggest changing firmware-linux-free to recommend
firmware-ath9k-htc.

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.16.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEJwCMxdBfG24Y2trvfWFEpid5MHIFAlsKKB0ACgkQfWFEpid5
MHJBXggAqGg2Eq0Memkhx9JShwVQeaZJepZEPjv7PBPvgzosuYBb8qCBzehVZcIE
F/kw/kk38zG35JNJKh5DYqoJdVzRECUkEMe2lBiLWJ9AMX+NbJHRgW2eWOvXu7T0
bhewDIrcieIAGbHwg7BAH6Wp5W3x+YpwXc6jAYC0FmuJPiaaqwTlQAY6c0Nhxw8/
zi56SA9AN7u2baBsmXG8LTqfxlYmybBoCdkapnD8jKBuYKWReuNmNN/QPKgHi9vn
j+rlJ6f05STI8dVAOkr1Se32PAVye9cdkdd1jlFIQNudJ48YNudrmE1letiCX8fw
I3K/xUVgfTDb8vwtcEKiT6AiGRH5XA==
=OtjS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#69146 — Bug#900171: Downstreams affected by absence of firmware-ath9k-htc

FromJohn Scott <jscott@posteo.net>
Date2021-01-14 18:10 +0100
SubjectBug#900171: Downstreams affected by absence of firmware-ath9k-htc
Message-ID<Bxeid-31k-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#61101

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

That firmware-ath9k-htc isn't installed by default seems to be confusing 
downstream users, particularly on derivatives that are designed to be free 
software only and FSF-endorsed. Trisquel explicitly makes an effort to include 
it [1], but PureOS does not (yet) [2], and their docs seem to reflect an 
understanding that all general-purpose free firmware is installed by firmware-
linux-free [3].

I'm notifying the distros and hardware vendors one by one of the situation, 
but it would be more worthwhile if my change could be merged in Debian.

[1] https://gitlab.trisquel.org/trisquel/trisquel-packages/-/blob/master/10.0/
trisquel-meta/debian/control
[2] https://tracker.pureos.net/T496
[3] https://tracker.pureos.net/w/troubleshooting/missing_firmware/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web