Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #60626 > unrolled thread

Bug#822730: marked as done (initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?)

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Bug#822730: marked as done (initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to  a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2018-04-04 21:50 +0200

#60626 — Bug#822730: marked as done (initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Wed, 04 Apr 2018 19:18:00 +0000
with message-id <c914046a-ca78-32f5-c5ea-f815743c0c95@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?
has caused the Debian Bug report #822730,
regarding initramfs-tools: Should we migrate to a "interest-noawait" trigger for update-initramfs -u?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
822730: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822730
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web