Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #59137 > unrolled thread

[m68k]: Please pull m68k updates

Started byJohn Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
First post2017-10-08 03:10 +0200
Last post2017-10-08 20:10 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel


Contents

  [m68k]: Please pull m68k updates John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2017-10-08 03:10 +0200
    Re: [m68k]: Please pull m68k updates Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-10-08 19:50 +0200
      Re: [m68k]: Please pull m68k updates John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2017-10-08 20:10 +0200

#59137 — [m68k]: Please pull m68k updates

FromJohn Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date2017-10-08 03:10 +0200
Subject[m68k]: Please pull m68k updates
Message-ID<uy8gq-6QE-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Ben!

Please pull the master branch from [1] to add some missing drivers to
ide-modules and scsi-modules on m68k. I have also enabled ata-modules
for m68k which contains just libata. Apparently libata was already implicitly
pulled in through pata-falcon through pata-modules. However, since other
architectures list libata explicitly, I thought we should do that on m68k
as well.

I have also created ide-core-modules and ide-modules for m68k explicitly
and moved the old-style IDE drivers from pata-modules to ide-modules,
where they actually belong. Re-enabling the ide-modules is supposed
to be a temporary solution until the drivers in question have been
converted to libata.

Those drivers are buddha, gayle, macide and q40ide and I'm helping
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz from Samsung who is working on the porting
efforts to libata.

I have build-tested my changes with the current src:linux package
from experimental and verified my changes to work.

Thanks,
Adrian

> [1] https://github.com/glaubitz/linux-debian.git

-- 
  .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
   `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#59140

FromBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date2017-10-08 19:50 +0200
Message-ID<uynSa-80-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#59137

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sun, 2017-10-08 at 03:04 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Ben!
> 
> Please pull the master branch from [1] to add some missing drivers to
> ide-modules and scsi-modules on m68k. I have also enabled ata-modules
> for m68k which contains just libata. Apparently libata was already implicitly
> pulled in through pata-falcon through pata-modules. However, since other
> architectures list libata explicitly, I thought we should do that on m68k
> as well.
> 
> I have also created ide-core-modules and ide-modules for m68k explicitly
> and moved the old-style IDE drivers from pata-modules to ide-modules,
> where they actually belong. Re-enabling the ide-modules is supposed
> to be a temporary solution until the drivers in question have been
> converted to libata.

I've pulled these changes and pushed them out to master.

Just one question: would it not make sense to move ide-gd_mod to ide-
core-modules?  It seems odd to have cdrom-core-modules depend on ide-
modules.

Ben.

> Those drivers are buddha, gayle, macide and q40ide and I'm helping
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz from Samsung who is working on the porting
> efforts to libata.
> 
> I have build-tested my changes with the current src:linux package
> from experimental and verified my changes to work.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> > [1] https://github.com/glaubitz/linux-debian.git
> 
> 
-- 
Ben Hutchings
compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#59141

FromJohn Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date2017-10-08 20:10 +0200
Message-ID<uyobw-ts-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#59140
Hi Ben!

On 10/08/2017 07:49 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I've pulled these changes and pushed them out to master.

Thank you very much!

> Just one question: would it not make sense to move ide-gd_mod to ide-
> core-modules?  It seems odd to have cdrom-core-modules depend on ide-
> modules.

I used this commit as a template:

commit 6f6911d8334f029e5228ad32c905d8d7efabe8d9
Author: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org>
Date:   Tue Jun 11 02:48:16 2013 +0000

    udeb: Move ide-modules and ide-core-modules into ia64 configuration

    svn path=/dists/trunk/linux/; revision=20241

In the future, we're hopefully dropping the IDE modules anyway, so I think
the current mechanism is fine as is, unless you think there is really
a problem with it.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web