Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #59646 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-12-13 22:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-12-17 15:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 10 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Iproute2 for Debian testing and backports Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> - 2017-12-13 22:30 +0100
Re: Iproute2 for Debian testing and backports Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> - 2017-12-14 08:30 +0100
Re: Iproute2 for Debian testing and backports Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> - 2017-12-14 08:50 +0100
Re: Iproute2 for Debian testing and backports Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> - 2017-12-14 09:00 +0100
Re: Re: Iproute2 for Debian testing and backports Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2017-12-16 00:50 +0100
Re: Iproute2 for Debian testing and backports Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> - 2017-12-16 09:10 +0100
Re: Iproute2 for Debian testing and backports Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2017-12-16 16:30 +0100
Re: Iproute2 for Debian testing and backports Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> - 2017-12-16 17:20 +0100
Re: Iproute2 for Debian testing and backports Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2017-12-17 14:50 +0100
Re: Iproute2 for Debian testing and backports Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> - 2017-12-17 15:00 +0100
| From | Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-12-13 22:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Iproute2 for Debian testing and backports |
| Message-ID | <uWmLg-63a-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Iproute2 gains new features every release to keep up with the upstream kernel. How do I request that iproute for Debian testing (buster) and backports (stretch-backports) be kept in sync? kernel iproute sid 4.14 4.9 buster 4.13 4.9 stretch-backports 4.13 4.9 stretch 4.9 4.9 Do you need resources to be applied to Debian maintenance for this?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-12-14 08:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uWw7T-40l-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #59646 |
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Iproute2 gains new features every release to keep up with the upstream kernel. > > How do I request that iproute for Debian testing (buster) and backports (stretch-backports) > be kept in sync? > kernel iproute > sid 4.14 4.9 > buster 4.13 4.9 > stretch-backports 4.13 4.9 > stretch 4.9 4.9 > > Do you need resources to be applied to Debian maintenance for this? Yes, we need more manpower. Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-12-14 08:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uWwrg-497-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #59649 |
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 08:26:07 +0100 > Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > Iproute2 gains new features every release to keep up with the upstream kernel. > > > > > > How do I request that iproute for Debian testing (buster) and backports (stretch-backports) > > > be kept in sync? > > > kernel iproute > > > sid 4.14 4.9 > > > buster 4.13 4.9 > > > stretch-backports 4.13 4.9 > > > stretch 4.9 4.9 > > > > > > Do you need resources to be applied to Debian maintenance for this? > > Yes, we need more manpower. > > > > Alex > > I am not an official Debian maintainer but could make a tree on github that was ready to go. > David could also feed any Cumulus patches back in. Thanks, I will try to give the packaging a shot in the weekend. Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-12-14 09:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uWwrg-497-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #59649 |
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 08:26:07 +0100 Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > Iproute2 gains new features every release to keep up with the upstream kernel. > > > > How do I request that iproute for Debian testing (buster) and backports (stretch-backports) > > be kept in sync? > > kernel iproute > > sid 4.14 4.9 > > buster 4.13 4.9 > > stretch-backports 4.13 4.9 > > stretch 4.9 4.9 > > > > Do you need resources to be applied to Debian maintenance for this? > Yes, we need more manpower. > > Alex I am not an official Debian maintainer but could make a tree on github that was ready to go. David could also feed any Cumulus patches back in.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-12-16 00:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uX7TQ-2IG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #59649 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > Iproute2 gains new features every release to keep up with the upstream kernel. > > > > How do I request that iproute for Debian testing (buster) and backports (stretch-backports) > > be kept in sync? > > kernel iproute > > sid 4.14 4.9 > > buster 4.13 4.9 > > stretch-backports 4.13 4.9 > > stretch 4.9 4.9 > > > > Do you need resources to be applied to Debian maintenance for this? > Yes, we need more manpower. > > Alex Hello Alex, In case you'd like some help in maintaining iproute2, I'll happily volunteer. I could give you a hand keeping up with new releases. We rely heavily on iproute2 at $work so it's a win-win. And I worked with Stephen in the past, so if he breaks something upstream I know where to find him :-P Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-12-16 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uXfHI-7SZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #59678 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > Iproute2 gains new features every release to keep up with the > upstream kernel. > > > > > > How do I request that iproute for Debian testing (buster) and > backports (stretch-backports) > > > be kept in sync? > > > kernel iproute > > > sid 4.14 4.9 > > > buster 4.13 4.9 > > > stretch-backports 4.13 4.9 > > > stretch 4.9 4.9 > > > > > > Do you need resources to be applied to Debian maintenance for this? > > Yes, we need more manpower. > > > > Alex > > Hello Alex, > > In case you'd like some help in maintaining iproute2, I'll happily > volunteer. I could give you a hand keeping up with new releases. We > rely heavily on iproute2 at $work so it's a win-win. > > And I worked with Stephen in the past, so if he breaks something > upstream I know where to find him :-P Your help is really welcome, do you have an alioth account? Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-12-16 16:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uXmzv-3UH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #59681 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 09:01 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Fri, 15 Dec 2017, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > > > Iproute2 gains new features every release to keep up with the > > > > upstream kernel. > > > > > > > > How do I request that iproute for Debian testing (buster) and > > > > backports (stretch-backports) > > > > be kept in sync? > > > > kernel iproute > > > > sid 4.14 4.9 > > > > buster 4.13 4.9 > > > > stretch-backports 4.13 4.9 > > > > stretch 4.9 4.9 > > > > > > > > Do you need resources to be applied to Debian maintenance for > > > this? > > > Yes, we need more manpower. > > > > > > Alex > > > > Hello Alex, > > > > In case you'd like some help in maintaining iproute2, I'll happily > > volunteer. I could give you a hand keeping up with new releases. We > > rely heavily on iproute2 at $work so it's a win-win. > > > > And I worked with Stephen in the past, so if he breaks something > > upstream I know where to find him :-P > > Your help is really welcome, do you have an alioth account? > > Alex Yes I do (DD :-) ) I propose the following: - upload 4.13 to sid, let it migrate to buster - upload 4.13 to stretch-backports - upload 4.14 to sid, and block it on 883558 so that it enters buster at the same time as the kernel I could start having a look at 4.13 tomorrow-ish. How does this plan sound? Thanks! Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-12-16 17:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uXnlU-4sY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #59684 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, Luca Boccassi wrote: Hi, *snip* > > Your help is really welcome, do you have an alioth account? > > > > Alex > > Yes I do (DD :-) ) argh, my bad. Since pkg-iproute is collab-maint you should already be able to commit. > > I propose the following: > > - upload 4.13 to sid, let it migrate to buster > - upload 4.13 to stretch-backports > - upload 4.14 to sid, and block it on 883558 so that it enters buster > at the same time as the kernel > > I could start having a look at 4.13 tomorrow-ish. > > How does this plan sound? Sounds like a great plan, please go ahead. Thanks a lot Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-12-17 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uXHui-1g2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #59685 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 17:14 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > Hi, > > *snip* > > > > Your help is really welcome, do you have an alioth account? > > > > > > Alex > > > > Yes I do (DD :-) ) > > argh, my bad. Since pkg-iproute is collab-maint you should already be > able to > commit. > > > > I propose the following: > > > > - upload 4.13 to sid, let it migrate to buster > > - upload 4.13 to stretch-backports > > - upload 4.14 to sid, and block it on 883558 so that it enters > > buster > > at the same time as the kernel > > > > I could start having a look at 4.13 tomorrow-ish. > > > > How does this plan sound? > > Sounds like a great plan, please go ahead. > > Thanks a lot > Alex 4.13 seems to be working fine on my Stretch laptop, tried a few route/link/addr/vrf commands. One patch to drop, one to refresh (fuzz), nothing else to do for now. Is it OK if I add myself to Uploaders? If so I'll push the changes to Alioth and then upload 4.13.0-1. BTW I'm hit by 851291/869191 so I'll avoid committing to pristine-tar for now, don't want to commit an unreproducible tarball. I'll check what xz options are being used upstream. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-12-17 15:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uXHDX-1kJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #59692 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 17:14 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > *snip* > > > > > > Your help is really welcome, do you have an alioth account? > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > Yes I do (DD :-) ) > > > > argh, my bad. Since pkg-iproute is collab-maint you should already be > > able to > > commit. > > > > > > I propose the following: > > > > > > - upload 4.13 to sid, let it migrate to buster > > > - upload 4.13 to stretch-backports > > > - upload 4.14 to sid, and block it on 883558 so that it enters > > > buster > > > at the same time as the kernel > > > > > > I could start having a look at 4.13 tomorrow-ish. > > > > > > How does this plan sound? > > > > Sounds like a great plan, please go ahead. > > > > Thanks a lot > > Alex > > 4.13 seems to be working fine on my Stretch laptop, tried a few > route/link/addr/vrf commands. > One patch to drop, one to refresh (fuzz), nothing else to do for now. This are great news. > > Is it OK if I add myself to Uploaders? yeah of course. > > If so I'll push the changes to Alioth and then upload 4.13.0-1. > > BTW I'm hit by 851291/869191 so I'll avoid committing to pristine-tar > for now, don't want to commit an unreproducible tarball. I'll check > what xz options are being used upstream. No problem. Alex
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web