Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #57915 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dave Love <dave.love@manchester.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-04 13:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-06-24 20:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Bug#864143: initramfs-tools: missing dependency on busybox? Dave Love <dave.love@manchester.ac.uk> - 2017-06-04 13:30 +0200
Bug#864143: marked as done (initramfs-tools: missing dependency on busybox?) owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) - 2017-06-05 02:50 +0200
Bug#864143: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Bug#864143: initramfs-tools: missing dependency on busybox?) Dave Love <dave.love@manchester.ac.uk> - 2017-06-05 18:40 +0200
Bug#864143: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Bug#864143: initramfs-tools: missing dependency on busybox?) Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-06-05 21:40 +0200
Bug#864143: initramfs-tools: missing dependency on busybox? Evgeny Zubok <evgeny.zubok@tochka.ru> - 2017-06-24 20:40 +0200
| From | Dave Love <dave.love@manchester.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 13:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#864143: initramfs-tools: missing dependency on busybox? |
| Message-ID | <tOBTj-4kb-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.130 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, initramfs-tools-core recommends busybox, but it appears to be required. I got this with an update after it was removed: Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.130) ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-3-amd64 E: busybox or busybox-static, version 1:1.22.0-17~ or later, is required but not installed update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-3-amd64 with 1. dpkg: error processing package initramfs-tools (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: initramfs-tools -- Package-specific info:
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-05 02:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#864143: marked as done (initramfs-tools: missing dependency on busybox?) |
| Message-ID | <tOOnv-3XL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #57915 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2017 01:41:03 +0100 with message-id <1496623263.3477.3.camel@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#864143: initramfs-tools: missing dependency on busybox? has caused the Debian Bug report #864143, regarding initramfs-tools: missing dependency on busybox? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 864143: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864143 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Love <dave.love@manchester.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-05 18:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#864143: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Bug#864143: initramfs-tools: missing dependency on busybox?) |
| Message-ID | <tP3cR-5hS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #57915 |
I guess I wrote that badly. busybox isn't actually required by cryptsetup, just recommended, but it should be required by something. The example shows it's possible to make packages uninstallable, if they pull the initramfs trigger, by removing busybox, which you can do cleanly as far as apt is concerned: # dpkg -l initramfs* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-==============-============-============-================================= ii initramfs-tool 0.130 all generic modular initramfs generat ii initramfs-tool 0.130 all generic modular initramfs generat # dpkg -l busybox* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-==============-============-============-================================= un busybox <none> <none> (no description available) un busybox-static <none> <none> (no description available) # apt-get check Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done #
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-05 21:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#864143: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Bug#864143: initramfs-tools: missing dependency on busybox?) |
| Message-ID | <tP614-73d-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #57931 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 17:13 +0100, Dave Love wrote: > I guess I wrote that badly. > > busybox isn't actually required by cryptsetup, just recommended, but it > should be required by something. The example shows it's possible to > make packages uninstallable, if they pull the initramfs trigger, by > removing busybox, which you can do cleanly as far as apt is concerned: If cryptsetup's initramfs support was moved to a separate package, that would depend on busybox. See bug #783297. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is easier to write an incorrect program than to understand a correct one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Evgeny Zubok <evgeny.zubok@tochka.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-24 20:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tVY8p-2Rt-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #57915 |
The same question.
1. Purge busybox which I installed manually (sorry for output in
Russian)
# aptitude purge busybox
Следующие пакеты будут УДАЛЕНЫ:
busybox{p}
0 пакетов обновлено, 0 установлено новых, 1 пакетов отмечено для удаления, и 2 пакетов не обновлено.
Необходимо получить 0 Б архивов. После распаковки освободится 699 kБ.
Хотите продолжить? [Y/n/?]
(Чтение базы данных … на данный момент установлено 154805 файлов и каталогов.)
Удаляется busybox (1:1.22.0-19+b3) …
Обрабатываются триггеры для man-db (2.7.6.1-2) …
2. Trying to update initramfs and...
# update-initramfs -u -k all
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-3-686-pae
E: busybox or busybox-static, version 1:1.22.0-17~ or later, is required but not installed
update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-3-686-pae with 1.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web