Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #56051 > unrolled thread

Bug#847343: firmware-misc-nonfree: breaks update-initramfs (initramfs-tools <= 0.125) if plymouth installed

Started byBen Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
First post2016-12-08 02:40 +0100
Last post2016-12-13 11:30 +0100
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel


Contents

  Bug#847343: firmware-misc-nonfree: breaks update-initramfs (initramfs-tools <= 0.125) if plymouth installed Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2016-12-08 02:40 +0100
    Bug#847343: firmware-misc-nonfree: breaks update-initramfs (initramfs-tools <= 0.125) if plymouth installed Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-12-08 03:30 +0100
      Bug#847343: firmware-misc-nonfree: breaks update-initramfs (initramfs-tools <= 0.125) if plymouth installed Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-12-08 03:50 +0100
      Bug#847343: firmware-misc-nonfree: breaks update-initramfs (initramfs-tools <= 0.125) if plymouth installed Tino Mettler <tino+debbugs@tikei.de> - 2016-12-13 11:30 +0100

#56051 — Bug#847343: firmware-misc-nonfree: breaks update-initramfs (initramfs-tools <= 0.125) if plymouth installed

FromBen Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
Date2016-12-08 02:40 +0100
SubjectBug#847343: firmware-misc-nonfree: breaks update-initramfs (initramfs-tools <= 0.125) if plymouth installed
Message-ID<sLVQJ-7V5-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Ben,

you reassigned this bug to initramfs-tools and removed the version. As 
detailed in #847343, I wanted to keep this bug on firmware-misc-nonfree 
because:

(1) it protects apt-listbugs users from upgrading firmware-misc-nonfree 
and being hit by #847340, and

(2) firmware-misc-nonfree lacks "Breaks: initramfs-tools (<=
0.125)" which it will need even after #847340 is fixed.

If you are sure that you want this bug on initramfs-tools, I will defer 
to your expertise, but I do not see how this addresses my points above.

Kind regards,

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz>
Director
Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/>
New Zealand

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#56054

FromBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date2016-12-08 03:30 +0100
Message-ID<sLWD7-8sB-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#56051

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Control: unmerge -1
Control: reassign -1 firmware-misc-nonfree 20161130-1

On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 14:33 +1300, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Ben,
> 
> you reassigned this bug to initramfs-tools and removed the version. As 
> detailed in #847343, I wanted to keep this bug on firmware-misc-nonfree 
> because:
> 
> (1) it protects apt-listbugs users from upgrading firmware-misc-nonfree 
> and being hit by #847340, and

Doesn't apt-listbugs see bugs that 'affect' a package?

> (2) firmware-misc-nonfree lacks "Breaks: initramfs-tools (<=
> 0.125)" which it will need even after #847340 is fixed.

I won't add that Breaks line because:
- Only the combination of the new firmware-misc-nonfree *and* plymouth
  breaks with the unfixed initramfs-tools
- jessie and jessie-backports will never have a version of initramfs-
  tools that satisfies that
- jessie can get a fix for this in a stable update

> If you are sure that you want this bug on initramfs-tools, I will defer 
> to your expertise, but I do not see how this addresses my points above.

I agree we need to stop this version of firmware-nonfree going into
testing before initramfs-tools is fixed, so I'm assigning this bug
back.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#56055

FromBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date2016-12-08 03:50 +0100
Message-ID<sLWWt-7M-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#56054

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 15:34 +1300, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 08/12/16 15:21, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Doesn't apt-listbugs see bugs that 'affect' a package?
> 
> I do not know. Does "affects" provide the version information that 
> apt-listbugs needs to filter bugs?

I don't think there's any way to specify which versions of the affected
package are affected.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#56128

FromTino Mettler <tino+debbugs@tikei.de>
Date2016-12-13 11:30 +0100
Message-ID<sNSvo-8sJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#56054
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:21:21 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:

[...]

> I agree we need to stop this version of firmware-nonfree going into
> testing before initramfs-tools is fixed, so I'm assigning this bug
> back.

This keeps #838858 (missing SI/CI smc firmware files) open in testing,
leaving affected users with a frozen screen after boot (no X , no text
console).

Regards,
Tino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web