Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #53810 > unrolled thread

Bug#822808: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: groupadd ends in EBUSY on /etc/group

Started byBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
First post2016-04-28 13:00 +0200
Last post2016-04-28 16:10 +0200
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#822808: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: groupadd ends in EBUSY on /etc/group Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-04-28 13:00 +0200
    Processed: Re: Bug#822808: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: groupadd  ends in EBUSY on /etc/group owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) - 2016-04-28 13:00 +0200
    Bug#822808: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: groupadd ends in EBUSY on /etc/group Michael Luecke <ml@mluecke.eu> - 2016-04-28 14:10 +0200
      Bug#822808: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: groupadd ends in EBUSY on /etc/group Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-04-28 14:30 +0200
        Bug#822808: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: groupadd ends in EBUSY on /etc/group Michael Luecke <ml@mluecke.eu> - 2016-04-28 16:10 +0200

#53810 — Bug#822808: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: groupadd ends in EBUSY on /etc/group

FromBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date2016-04-28 13:00 +0200
SubjectBug#822808: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: groupadd ends in EBUSY on /etc/group
Message-ID<rsRPQ-1Hf-1@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Control: tag -1 moreinfo

Is /etc/group a bind mountpoint?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
All extremists should be taken out and shot.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#53812 — Processed: Re: Bug#822808: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: groupadd ends in EBUSY on /etc/group

Fromowner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date2016-04-28 13:00 +0200
SubjectProcessed: Re: Bug#822808: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: groupadd ends in EBUSY on /etc/group
Message-ID<rsRPQ-1Hf-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#53810
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #822808 [src:linux] linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: groupadd ends in EBUSY on /etc/group
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
822808: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822808
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#53815

FromMichael Luecke <ml@mluecke.eu>
Date2016-04-28 14:10 +0200
Message-ID<rsSVC-2Qt-55@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#53810
No it isn't, I attached the mounttab to my bugreport.

The fstab is as the debian installer created it, the only things I added are:
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,nosuid 0 0
/media/qnapnas/michael/Container/backup_wst.bin /media/misc/backup
ext4 defaults,nosuid,noauto,nofail 0 2

Michael

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> Is /etc/group a bind mountpoint?
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> All extremists should be taken out and shot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#53817

FromBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date2016-04-28 14:30 +0200
Message-ID<rsTeV-32p-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#53815

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 14:01 +0200, Michael Luecke wrote:
> No it isn't, I attached the mounttab to my bugreport.
[...]

That's the mount table for the *root* mount namespace.  But there could
be processes running in other mount namespaces.  Are you using any kind
of container system, for example?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
All extremists should be taken out and shot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#53822

FromMichael Luecke <ml@mluecke.eu>
Date2016-04-28 16:10 +0200
Message-ID<rsUNI-4t4-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#53817
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> That's the mount table for the *root* mount namespace.  But there could
> be processes running in other mount namespaces.

It's a fresh installed system and I did not mount anything manually.

> Are you using any kind of container system, for example?

You mean related to some kind of virtualization? No I'm not.

Michael

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web