Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #93834 > unrolled thread

Bug#1145026: linux-image-6.12.101+deb13-amd64: [REGRESSION] 6.12.101 breaks AMD SEV, SEV-ES, and SEV-SNP platform initialization

Started bySalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
First post2026-08-21 17:00 +0200
Last post2026-08-21 17:00 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1145026: linux-image-6.12.101+deb13-amd64: [REGRESSION] 6.12.101 breaks AMD SEV, SEV-ES, and SEV-SNP platform initialization Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2026-08-21 17:00 +0200

#93834 — Bug#1145026: linux-image-6.12.101+deb13-amd64: [REGRESSION] 6.12.101 breaks AMD SEV, SEV-ES, and SEV-SNP platform initialization

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2026-08-21 17:00 +0200
SubjectBug#1145026: linux-image-6.12.101+deb13-amd64: [REGRESSION] 6.12.101 breaks AMD SEV, SEV-ES, and SEV-SNP platform initialization
Message-ID<NuySR-ck4k-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 10:29:40AM -0400, Andrew wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 6.12.101-1
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: wizlonex@gmail.com
> 
> Subject: linux-image-6.12.101+deb13-amd64: [REGRESSION] 6.12.101 breaks AMD SEV, SEV-ES, and SEV-SNP platform initialization
> Package: src:linux
> X-Debbugs-Cc: wizlonex@gmail.com
> Version: 6.12.101-1
> Severity: important
> 
> Hi Debian Kernel Team,
> 
> Reporting a regression introduced in linux-image-6.12.101+deb13-amd64 that breaks 
> AMD SEV/SEV-ES and SEV-SNP guest launching across different AMD EPYC platforms.
> 
> Disclaimer: I am a homelab enthusiast, not a kernel developer, so I may have limited 
> ability to answer deep technical debugging questions. However, I have tested and 
> confirmed this regression reproducibly across two different systems with concrete logs.
> 
> --- Platforms Tested ---
> - System 1 (AMD EPYC Rome platform - Supermicro H11DSi-NT): Running SEV-ES guests.
> - System 2 (AMD EPYC Milan platform): Running SEV-SNP guests.
> 
> --- Observed Failure on 6.12.101+deb13-amd64 ---
> Host kernel command line:
>   amd_iommu=on mem_encrypt=on kvm_amd.sev=1 kvm_amd.sev_es=1
> 
> 1. Diagnostic probe via Virtee 'snphost ok' tool indicates uninitialized platform:
>    [ PASS ] - Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV)
>    [ FAIL ]   - SEV-ES initialized
>    [ FAIL ] - SEV initialized: Uninitialized
> 
> 2. All SEV-ES guests fail to start with QEMU errors:
>    libvirtd[12953]: internal error: QEMU unexpectedly closed the monitor (vm='solo-pub-ws'): 
>    qemu-system-x86_64: -accel kvm: sev_common_kvm_init: guest policy requires SEV-ES, but host SEV-ES support unavailable
>    qemu-system-x86_64: -accel kvm: failed to initialize kvm: Operation not permitted
> 
> 3. Kernel dmesg comparison indicates CCP/SEV platform init is delayed/missing at boot:
>    On 6.12.101, 'ccp ... SEV API:0.24 build:22' does not fire during boot init, 
>    leaving the platform uninitialized when libvirt attempts guest autostart.
> 
> --- Working Baseline on 6.12.95+deb13-amd64 ---
> Rebooting back into kernel 6.12.95+deb13-amd64 immediately resolves the issue 
> across both platforms without any guest XML or QEMU changes:
> 
> 1. 'snphost ok' reports ready:
>    [ PASS ] - Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV)
>    [ PASS ]   - SEV-ES initialized
>    [ PASS ] - SEV initialized: Initialized, currently running a guest
> 
> 2. All SEV-ES guests (solo-pvt-ws, solo-pub-ws, solo-gateway) autostart and run cleanly.

As you can reliably confirm the regression, please bisect the issue
between 6.12.95 and 6.12.101 to identify which commit(s) break. The
procedure is as follows:

    git clone --single-branch -b linux-6.12.y https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
    cd linux-stable
    git checkout v6.12.95
    cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) .config
    yes '' | make localmodconfig
    make savedefconfig
    mv defconfig arch/x86/configs/my_defconfig

    # test 6.12.95 to ensure this is "good"
    make my_defconfig
    make -j $(nproc) bindeb-pkg
    ... install the resulting .deb package and confirm problem does not exist

    # test 6.12.101 to ensure this is "bad"
    git checkout v6.12.101
    make my_defconfig
    make -j $(nproc) bindeb-pkg
    ... install the resulting .deb package and confirm problem exists

With that confirmed, the bisection can start:

    git bisect start
    git bisect good v6.12.95
    git bisect bad v6.12.101

In each bisection step git checks out a state between the oldest
known-bad and the newest known-good commit. In each step test using:

    make my_defconfig
    make -j $(nproc) bindeb-pkg
    ... install, verify if problem exists

and if the problem is hit run:

    git bisect bad

and if the problem doesn't trigger run:

    git bisect good

. Please pay attention to always select the just built kernel for
booting, it won't always be the default kernel picked up by grub.

Iterate until git announces to have identified the first bad commit.

Then provide the output of

    git bisect log

In the course of the bisection you might have to uninstall previous
kernels again to not exhaust the disk space in /boot. Also in the end
uninstall all self-built kernels again.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web