Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #91691 > unrolled thread

Bug#1112238: Chance to include a workaround?

Started byLinux-Fan <info@masysma.net>
First post2026-03-15 20:10 +0100
Last post2026-03-18 13:40 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1112238: Chance to include a workaround? Linux-Fan <info@masysma.net> - 2026-03-15 20:10 +0100
    Bug#1112238: Chance to include a workaround? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2026-03-18 13:40 +0100

#91691 — Bug#1112238: Chance to include a workaround?

FromLinux-Fan <info@masysma.net>
Date2026-03-15 20:10 +0100
SubjectBug#1112238: Chance to include a workaround?
Message-ID<MyZ0B-7LKV-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hello,

after a long time of no update, I had asked at the upstream aobut how this  
might be fixed, but so far, progress on this issue seems to have stalled? [1]

Is there a chance that Debian could include a patch (maybe the same as is  
included in Ubuntu [2]) as a workaround? Right now I am still using my  
old Linux 6.1 kernel but of course I would like to update...

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/cone.1771011420.835087.30022.1000@masysma-18/

[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/cone.1771011420.835087.30022.1000@masysma-18/3-ubuntu.patch

Thanks in Advance and Kind Regards,
Linux-Fan

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#91719

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2026-03-18 13:40 +0100
Message-ID<MzYlP-8rYU-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#91691
Hi,

[Bjorn, for information, this only includes the Debian downstream bug,
not the full list of recipients in the original upstream thread]

On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 07:53:28PM +0100, Linux-Fan wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> after a long time of no update, I had asked at the upstream aobut how this
> might be fixed, but so far, progress on this issue seems to have stalled?
> [1]
> 
> Is there a chance that Debian could include a patch (maybe the same as is
> included in Ubuntu [2]) as a workaround? Right now I am still using my old
> Linux 6.1 kernel but of course I would like to update...
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/cone.1771011420.835087.30022.1000@masysma-18/
> 
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/cone.1771011420.835087.30022.1000@masysma-18/3-ubuntu.patch

We need an upstreamed patch and so beeing sustainable with the
frequent rebases. So we won't follow the Ubuntu approach of applying a
non-acked patch upstream.

I think Canonical should be equally intersted to not ship their patch
indefintively. Bjorn Helgaas said to try to come up with some ideas on
how to tackle the problem. Bjorn do have any idea on how to move
forward here on this issue?

Is there anything else people affected, like Linux-Fan, which could
help further?

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web