Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #91204 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-02-13 18:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2026-02-17 11:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1127823: ip6_tunnel, ip6tnl, module fails to encapsulate/transmit packets in kernel 6.1.0-43 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2026-02-13 18:20 +0100
Bug#1127823: ip6_tunnel, ip6tnl, module fails to encapsulate/transmit packets in kernel 6.1.0-43 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2026-02-17 11:40 +0100
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-13 18:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1127823: ip6_tunnel, ip6tnl, module fails to encapsulate/transmit packets in kernel 6.1.0-43 |
| Message-ID | <Mo4ZI-kJz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 05:12:07PM +0200, Hostinger NOC wrote:
> Package: linux-image-6.1.0-43-amd64
> Version: 6.1.162-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: upstream
>
> Hello,
>
> The ip6_tunnel kernel module is broken in linux-image-6.1.0-43-amd64
> (upstream 6.1.162). IPv6 tunnels (mode "any") fail to encapsulate or
> transmit any packets.
>
> WORKING CONFIGURATION:
> - Kernel: 6.1.0-37-amd64 (upstream 6.1.140)
> - Tunnel works correctly with identical configuration
>
> BROKEN CONFIGURATION:
> - Kernel: 6.1.0-43-amd64 (upstream 6.1.162)
> - Same tunnel configuration fails completely
>
> REPRODUCTION STEPS:
> 1. Create IPv6 tunnel with mode "any":
> ip link add tun0 type ip6tnl mode any \
> remote 2001:db8::2 \
> local 2001:db8::1 \
> encaplimit 4
> ip addr add 192.0.2.1/30 dev tun0
> ip addr add 2001:db8:1::1/126 dev tun0
> ip link set tun0 up mtu 1500
>
> 2. Send traffic through tunnel:
> ping -c 3 -I tun0 192.0.2.2
>
> 3. Monitor physical interface:
> tcpdump -i eth0 -nn 'ip6 and host 2001:db8::2'
>
> EXPECTED BEHAVIOR (kernel 6.1.0-37):
> - tcpdump shows encapsulated packets with protocol 60 (DSTOPT) or 4 (IPIP)
> - Tunnel traffic flows successfully
>
> ACTUAL BEHAVIOR (kernel 6.1.0-43):
> - tcpdump captures ZERO packets
> - TX counter increments on tunnel interface but packets disappear in
> kernel
> - RX packets show errors
>
> EVIDENCE - Side-by-side comparison:
>
> Kernel 6.1.0-37 (WORKING):
> Protocol 60 (DSTOPT) packets visible on wire
> Encapsulation functioning correctly
>
> Kernel 6.1.0-43 (BROKEN):
> 0 packets captured
> No packets transmitted to physical interface
>
> SYSTEM INFORMATION:
> - Debian version: 12 (bookworm)
> - Architecture: amd64
> - Broken kernel: 6.1.0-43-amd64 (6.1.162-1)
> - Working kernel: 6.1.0-37-amd64 (6.1.140-1)
> - Boot parameters tested: default and mitigations=off (both fail)
>
> IMPACT:
> - All IPv6 tunnels using ip6tnl module are affected
> - Workaround: downgrade to 6.1.0-37
>
> ADDITIONAL NOTES:
> - Issue persists regardless of tunnel parameters (MTU, encaplimit,
> offloads)
> - Module parameter changes have no effect
> - Issue affects both encapsulation (TX) and decapsulation (RX)
> - No relevant errors in dmesg or kernel logs
>
> Could you please investigate this regression? Is there any additional
> debugging information or testing I can provide to help identify the root
> cause?
> Would additional debugging output be helpful? I can provide kernel
> logs, strace output, or test patches if needed.
See #1127597.
Can you confirm that applying 9990ddf47d41 ("net: tunnel: make
skb_vlan_inet_prepare() return drop reasons") on top as well of
6.1.162-1 (or 6.1.163 upstream) fixes the issue and report back
please?
Regards,
Salvatore
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-02-17 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MpqEO-1g1v-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #91204 |
Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 11:32:30AM +0200, Hostinger NOC wrote: > Hello, > > We can confirm that applying 9990ddf47d41 on top off 6.1.162-1 resolves the > issue. Thanks for the confirmation, I asked for a 6.1.y inclusion in https://lore.kernel.org/stable/177132401902.2893171.1371685164011289024@eldamar.lan Regards, Salvatore
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web