Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #90876 > unrolled thread

Bug#1125980:

Started by光の夢 <hikari@noyu.me>
First post2026-01-19 22:50 +0100
Last post2026-01-21 18:50 +0100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1125980:  光の夢 <hikari@noyu.me> - 2026-01-19 22:50 +0100
    Bug#1125980:  Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> - 2026-01-21 17:10 +0100
      Bug#1125980:  Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org> - 2026-01-21 18:50 +0100

#90876 — Bug#1125980:

From光の夢 <hikari@noyu.me>
Date2026-01-19 22:50 +0100
SubjectBug#1125980:
Message-ID<Mf5ih-bN7o-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi,

It was helpfully pointed out to me that since this is a very new platform, it might be wise to try the newer backported kernel.

I installed linux-image-amd64/trixie-backports and now I have 6.17.13. This kernel version seems to not usually have trouble resuming from suspend, and it also seems to enter a truer suspended state, as the power and ThinkPad LEDs now pulse when suspended, which wasn't the case with the older kernels.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#90908

FromUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Date2026-01-21 17:10 +0100
Message-ID<MfIWm-cdGw-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#90876

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hello,

On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 10:34:58PM +0100, 光の夢 wrote:
> It was helpfully pointed out to me that since this is a very new platform, it might be wise to try the newer backported kernel.
> 
> I installed linux-image-amd64/trixie-backports and now I have 6.17.13. This kernel version seems to not usually have trouble resuming from suspend, and it also seems to enter a truer suspended state, as the power and ThinkPad LEDs now pulse when suspended, which wasn't the case with the older kernels.

That's great. Unless you intend to help identifying the commit
responsible to fix your issue, I'd close this bug then.

(If you want to help, can you please check for kernels on
https://snapshot.debian.org and work out which one is the first working
kernel.)

Best regards
Uwe

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#90910

FromUwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org>
Date2026-01-21 18:50 +0100
Message-ID<MfKv7-ceye-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#90908

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 05:34:12PM +0100, 光の夢 wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2026, at 17:02, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >
> > (If you want to help, can you please check for kernels on
> > https://snapshot.debian.org and work out which one is the first working
> > kernel.)
> 
> Thanks for that link, that should make it easier to track this down than I had feared. I'll try to do a binary search.

The complication probably comes later because you will identify that it was
broken by a major version bump. Then we might ask you for something like

	https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1125405#10

with the added difficulty that we're looking for a fix instead of a
breakage (which isn't a big issue). :-D

Best regards
Uwe

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web