Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #89868 > unrolled thread

linux/6.12.y: Dropping bcachefs support in next trixie upload

Started bySalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
First post2025-11-01 19:30 +0100
Last post2025-11-02 03:00 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel


Contents

  linux/6.12.y: Dropping bcachefs support in next trixie upload Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-11-01 19:30 +0100
    Re: linux/6.12.y: Dropping bcachefs support in next trixie upload Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2025-11-02 03:00 +0100

#89868 — linux/6.12.y: Dropping bcachefs support in next trixie upload

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2025-11-01 19:30 +0100
Subjectlinux/6.12.y: Dropping bcachefs support in next trixie upload
Message-ID<LMowp-9Itc-1@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi

Following
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1634 and
having dropped bcachefs support in unstable/forky in the kernel I
think it would be time to consider doing the same for the next trixie
Linux upload, but I would want to get opinions, or NACKs from SRM if
this is not wanted.

bcachefs-tools were not released along with trixie, so I suspect we
have only a little user base at all.

The changes would be as in the above merge request, and adding a
corresponding NEWS entry as well.

Should we move ahead and do that?

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#89886

FromCyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Date2025-11-02 03:00 +0100
Message-ID<LMvxT-9N6y-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#89868

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Salvatore,

Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-11-01):
> Following
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1634 and
> having dropped bcachefs support in unstable/forky in the kernel I
> think it would be time to consider doing the same for the next trixie
> Linux upload, but I would want to get opinions, or NACKs from SRM if
> this is not wanted.
> 
> bcachefs-tools were not released along with trixie, so I suspect we
> have only a little user base at all.
> 
> The changes would be as in the above merge request, and adding a
> corresponding NEWS entry as well.
> 
> Should we move ahead and do that?

Besides what you already mentioned regarding bcachefs-tools, I don't see
anything bcachefs-related in the d-i codebase, so no objections on that
front.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web