Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #89868 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-11-01 19:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2025-11-02 03:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
linux/6.12.y: Dropping bcachefs support in next trixie upload Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-11-01 19:30 +0100
Re: linux/6.12.y: Dropping bcachefs support in next trixie upload Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2025-11-02 03:00 +0100
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-01 19:30 +0100 |
| Subject | linux/6.12.y: Dropping bcachefs support in next trixie upload |
| Message-ID | <LMowp-9Itc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Following https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1634 and having dropped bcachefs support in unstable/forky in the kernel I think it would be time to consider doing the same for the next trixie Linux upload, but I would want to get opinions, or NACKs from SRM if this is not wanted. bcachefs-tools were not released along with trixie, so I suspect we have only a little user base at all. The changes would be as in the above merge request, and adding a corresponding NEWS entry as well. Should we move ahead and do that? Regards, Salvatore
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-02 03:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <LMvxT-9N6y-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #89868 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Salvatore, Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2025-11-01): > Following > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1634 and > having dropped bcachefs support in unstable/forky in the kernel I > think it would be time to consider doing the same for the next trixie > Linux upload, but I would want to get opinions, or NACKs from SRM if > this is not wanted. > > bcachefs-tools were not released along with trixie, so I suspect we > have only a little user base at all. > > The changes would be as in the above merge request, and adding a > corresponding NEWS entry as well. > > Should we move ahead and do that? Besides what you already mentioned regarding bcachefs-tools, I don't see anything bcachefs-related in the d-i codebase, so no objections on that front. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web