Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #86448 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-03-15 07:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2025-03-18 18:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
Uploading linux (6.12.19-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-03-15 07:30 +0100
Re: Uploading linux (6.12.19-1) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-03-18 18:00 +0100
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-15 07:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Uploading linux (6.12.19-1) |
| Message-ID | <KqtbX-6bDE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi
I would like to upload linuxversion 6.12.19-1 to unstable (with the
aim that this should migrate to testing for trixie).
It imports 6.12.18 and 6.12.19 on top of the current packaging. There
are some packaging changes to improve (hardware) support:
* Compress kernel with zstd where supported. (Closes: #1099722)
This was asked primarily from the loong64 porters to unblock their
FTBFS.
* [amd64] sound/soc/amd/acp: Enable SND_AMD_ASOC_ACP70, SND_SOC_AMD_ACP_PCI
and SND_SOC_AMD_LEGACY_MACH as modules (Closes: #1096006)
* Enable IIO HRTIMER and SYSFS trigger. These are useful to do high-speed
continuous and manual (or scripted) sensor reading respectively.
* sound/pci/hda: Enable SND_HDA_SCODEC_CS35L56_I2C,
SND_HDA_SCODEC_CS35L56_SPI, SND_SOC_CS35L56_I2C, SND_SOC_CS35L56_SPI,
SND_SOC_CS35L56_SDW as modules
The upload does not contain yet the fixes posted upstream for the
netfs issues (#1099591, #1098698) for which I have raised the
severity, I think it should be considered RC.
For the release team, as my question in my last mail might have got
lost: What are you expecting from the kernel-team in these stages of
the freeze towards the trixie release from us? As for stable we
usually try to keep the pace with new stable upstream series versions.
Can you confirm this is still okay from you with the current approach
or let us know where you want us to adjust? Is this simple heads-up
advance notification still enough or do you need more time?
Regards,
Salvatore
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-18 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <KrIsi-70wX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #86448 |
Hi Emilio, On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 04:18:32PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 15/03/2025 07:27, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi > > > > I would like to upload linuxversion 6.12.19-1 to unstable (with the > > aim that this should migrate to testing for trixie). > > > > It imports 6.12.18 and 6.12.19 on top of the current packaging. There > > are some packaging changes to improve (hardware) support: > > > > * Compress kernel with zstd where supported. (Closes: #1099722) > > > > This was asked primarily from the loong64 porters to unblock their > > FTBFS. > > > > * [amd64] sound/soc/amd/acp: Enable SND_AMD_ASOC_ACP70, SND_SOC_AMD_ACP_PCI > > and SND_SOC_AMD_LEGACY_MACH as modules (Closes: #1096006) > > * Enable IIO HRTIMER and SYSFS trigger. These are useful to do high-speed > > continuous and manual (or scripted) sensor reading respectively. > > * sound/pci/hda: Enable SND_HDA_SCODEC_CS35L56_I2C, > > SND_HDA_SCODEC_CS35L56_SPI, SND_SOC_CS35L56_I2C, SND_SOC_CS35L56_SPI, > > SND_SOC_CS35L56_SDW as modules > > > > The upload does not contain yet the fixes posted upstream for the > > netfs issues (#1099591, #1098698) for which I have raised the > > severity, I think it should be considered RC. > > > > For the release team, as my question in my last mail might have got > > lost: What are you expecting from the kernel-team in these stages of > > the freeze towards the trixie release from us? As for stable we > > usually try to keep the pace with new stable upstream series versions. > > Can you confirm this is still okay from you with the current approach > > or let us know where you want us to adjust? Is this simple heads-up > > advance notification still enough or do you need more time? > > I think this is fine at this stage, but please add a cc to debian-boot as > kernel updates affect d-i. I'll check with them and see if we need more > advance notice, but for now this should suffice. Thanks a lot for your feedback. Yes will add in future debian-boot as well. FWIW, requests for adding hardware support are flowing in at this stage more in my gut feeling as people start more to test trixie. Regards, Salvatore
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web