Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #85576 > unrolled thread

Bug#1098354: linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64

Started byMatthias Babisch <mb@gosmooth.de>
First post2025-02-19 13:50 +0100
Last post2025-03-02 01:10 +0100
Articles 11 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

Contents

  Bug#1098354: linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64 Matthias Babisch <mb@gosmooth.de> - 2025-02-19 13:50 +0100
    Bug#1098354: linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-02-21 08:20 +0100
      Bug#1098354: linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64 Matthias Babisch <mb@gosmooth.de> - 2025-02-23 05:10 +0100
        Bug#1098354: linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-02-24 08:30 +0100
        Bug#1098354: linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64 "Diederik de Haas" <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2025-02-27 00:20 +0100
    Bug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S,  one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-02-28 13:00 +0100
    Bug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S,  one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-02-28 13:00 +0100
    Bug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S,  one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-02-28 13:00 +0100
    Bug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S,  one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-03-02 01:10 +0100
    Bug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S,  one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-03-02 01:10 +0100
    Bug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S,  one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2025-03-02 01:10 +0100

#85576 — Bug#1098354: linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64

FromMatthias Babisch <mb@gosmooth.de>
Date2025-02-19 13:50 +0100
SubjectBug#1098354: linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64
Message-ID<KhRGx-mWq-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.124-1
Severity: important
File: linux-image-6.1.0
X-Debbugs-Cc: mb@gosmooth.de

lspci on system affected
root@takashi:~# lspci 
0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
0001:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)

lspci on system not affected
root@kiyoko:~# lspci 
0000:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
0000:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
0001:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)

System is unaffected if running older kernel. I have two systems. They both
work if running the older kernel, both don't when running the newer kernel.

Older kernel:
root@kiyoko:~# cat /proc/version 
Linux version 6.1.0-28-arm64 (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40) #1 SMP Debian 6.1.119-1 (2024-11-22)

-- Package-specific info:
** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached

** Model information
Device Tree model: FriendlyElec NanoPi R5S

** PCI devices:
0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor [1d87:3566] (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 68
	Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=ff, sec-latency=0
	I/O behind bridge: 1000-1fff [size=4K] [16-bit]
	Memory behind bridge: 40000000-400fffff [size=1M] [32-bit]
	Prefetchable memory behind bridge: [disabled] [64-bit]
	Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- <SERR- <PERR-
	Expansion ROM at 340100000 [virtual] [disabled] [size=64K]
	BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR+ NoISA- VGA- VGA16- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
		PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
	Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
		Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold-)
		Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
	Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/32 Maskable- 64bit+
		Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000
	Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Root Port (Slot-), MSI 08
		DevCap:	MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0
			ExtTag- RBE+
		DevCtl:	CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
			RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
			MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
		DevSta:	CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq- AuxPwr- TransPend-
		LnkCap:	Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L1, Exit Latency L1 <64us
			ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep+ BwNot+ ASPMOptComp+
		LnkCtl:	ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, Disabled- CommClk+
			ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
		LnkSta:	Speed 5GT/s, Width x1
			TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive+ BWMgmt+ ABWMgmt+
		RootCap: CRSVisible+
		RootCtl: ErrCorrectable- ErrNon-Fatal- ErrFatal- PMEIntEna+ CRSVisible+
		RootSta: PME ReqID 0000, PMEStatus- PMEPending-
		DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Not Supported, TimeoutDis+ NROPrPrP+ LTR+
			 10BitTagComp- 10BitTagReq- OBFF Via message/WAKE#, ExtFmt- EETLPPrefix-
			 EmergencyPowerReduction Not Supported, EmergencyPowerReductionInit-
			 FRS- LN System CLS Not Supported, TPHComp- ExtTPHComp- ARIFwd-
			 AtomicOpsCap: Routing- 32bit- 64bit- 128bitCAS-
		DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis- LTR+ 10BitTagReq- OBFF Disabled, ARIFwd-
			 AtomicOpsCtl: ReqEn- EgressBlck-
		LnkCap2: Supported Link Speeds: 2.5-8GT/s, Crosslink- Retimer- 2Retimers- DRS-
		LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 8GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-
			 Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
			 Compliance Preset/De-emphasis: -6dB de-emphasis, 0dB preshoot
		LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB, EqualizationComplete- EqualizationPhase1-
			 EqualizationPhase2- EqualizationPhase3- LinkEqualizationRequest-
			 Retimer- 2Retimers- CrosslinkRes: unsupported
	Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=128 Masked-
		Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00020000
		PBA: BAR=4 offset=00028000
	Capabilities: [100 v2] Advanced Error Reporting
		UESta:	DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
		UEMsk:	DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
		UESvrt:	DLP+ SDES+ TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
		CESta:	RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- AdvNonFatalErr-
		CEMsk:	RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- AdvNonFatalErr+
		AERCap:	First Error Pointer: 00, ECRCGenCap+ ECRCGenEn- ECRCChkCap+ ECRCChkEn-
			MultHdrRecCap- MultHdrRecEn- TLPPfxPres- HdrLogCap-
		HeaderLog: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
		RootCmd: CERptEn+ NFERptEn+ FERptEn+
		RootSta: CERcvd- MultCERcvd- UERcvd- MultUERcvd-
			 FirstFatal- NonFatalMsg- FatalMsg- IntMsg 9
		ErrorSrc: ERR_COR: 0000 ERR_FATAL/NONFATAL: 0000
	Capabilities: [148 v1] Secondary PCI Express
		LnkCtl3: LnkEquIntrruptEn- PerformEqu-
		LaneErrStat: 0
	Capabilities: [160 v1] L1 PM Substates
		L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1+ L1_PM_Substates+
			  PortCommonModeRestoreTime=10us PortTPowerOnTime=14us
		L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2- ASPM_L1.1-
			   T_CommonMode=150us LTR1.2_Threshold=306176ns
		L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=150us
	Capabilities: [170 v1] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0002 Rev=4 Len=100 <?>
	Kernel driver in use: pcieport

0001:01:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller [10ec:8125] (rev 05)
	Subsystem: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller [10ec:8125]
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 68
	Region 0: I/O ports at 1000 [size=256]
	Region 2: Memory at 340000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
	Region 4: Memory at 340010000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
	Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
		Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
		Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
	Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+
		Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000
		Masking: 00000000  Pending: 00000000
	Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 01
		DevCap:	MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <64us
			ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset- SlotPowerLimit 0W
		DevCtl:	CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
			RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
			MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 4096 bytes
		DevSta:	CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq- AuxPwr+ TransPend-
		LnkCap:	Port #0, Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s unlimited, L1 <64us
			ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp+
		LnkCtl:	ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, Disabled- CommClk+
			ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
		LnkSta:	Speed 5GT/s, Width x1
			TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
		DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range ABCD, TimeoutDis+ NROPrPrP- LTR+
			 10BitTagComp- 10BitTagReq- OBFF Via message/WAKE#, ExtFmt- EETLPPrefix-
			 EmergencyPowerReduction Not Supported, EmergencyPowerReductionInit-
			 FRS- TPHComp+ ExtTPHComp-
			 AtomicOpsCap: 32bit- 64bit- 128bitCAS-
		DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis- LTR+ 10BitTagReq- OBFF Disabled,
			 AtomicOpsCtl: ReqEn-
		LnkCap2: Supported Link Speeds: 2.5-5GT/s, Crosslink- Retimer- 2Retimers- DRS-
		LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-
			 Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
			 Compliance Preset/De-emphasis: -6dB de-emphasis, 0dB preshoot
		LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB, EqualizationComplete- EqualizationPhase1-
			 EqualizationPhase2- EqualizationPhase3- LinkEqualizationRequest-
			 Retimer- 2Retimers- CrosslinkRes: unsupported
	Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=32 Masked-
		Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00000000
		PBA: BAR=4 offset=00000800
	Capabilities: [d0] Vital Product Data
		Not readable
	Capabilities: [100 v2] Advanced Error Reporting
		UESta:	DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
		UEMsk:	DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
		UESvrt:	DLP+ SDES+ TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
		CESta:	RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- AdvNonFatalErr-
		CEMsk:	RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- AdvNonFatalErr+
		AERCap:	First Error Pointer: 00, ECRCGenCap+ ECRCGenEn- ECRCChkCap+ ECRCChkEn-
			MultHdrRecCap- MultHdrRecEn- TLPPfxPres- HdrLogCap-
		HeaderLog: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
	Capabilities: [148 v1] Virtual Channel
		Caps:	LPEVC=0 RefClk=100ns PATEntryBits=1
		Arb:	Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128-
		Ctrl:	ArbSelect=Fixed
		Status:	InProgress-
		VC0:	Caps:	PATOffset=00 MaxTimeSlots=1 RejSnoopTrans-
			Arb:	Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128- TWRR128- WRR256-
			Ctrl:	Enable+ ID=0 ArbSelect=Fixed TC/VC=ff
			Status:	NegoPending- InProgress-
	Capabilities: [168 v1] Device Serial Number 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
	Capabilities: [178 v1] Transaction Processing Hints
		No steering table available
	Capabilities: [204 v1] Latency Tolerance Reporting
		Max snoop latency: 0ns
		Max no snoop latency: 0ns
	Capabilities: [20c v1] L1 PM Substates
		L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1+ L1_PM_Substates+
			  PortCommonModeRestoreTime=150us PortTPowerOnTime=150us
		L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2- ASPM_L1.1-
			   T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=306176ns
		L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=150us
	Capabilities: [21c v1] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0002 Rev=4 Len=100 <?>
	Kernel driver in use: r8169
	Kernel modules: r8169

0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor [1d87:3566] (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 71
	Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=ff, sec-latency=0
	I/O behind bridge: [disabled] [16-bit]
	Memory behind bridge: [disabled] [32-bit]
	Prefetchable memory behind bridge: [disabled] [64-bit]
	Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- <SERR- <PERR-
	Expansion ROM at 380000000 [virtual] [disabled] [size=64K]
	BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR+ NoISA- VGA- VGA16- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
		PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
	Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
		Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold-)
		Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
	Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/32 Maskable+ 64bit+
		Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000
		Masking: 00000000  Pending: 00000000
	Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Root Port (Slot-), MSI 08
		DevCap:	MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0
			ExtTag- RBE+
		DevCtl:	CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
			RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
			MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
		DevSta:	CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq- AuxPwr- TransPend-
		LnkCap:	Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x2, ASPM L1, Exit Latency L1 <64us
			ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep+ BwNot- ASPMOptComp+
		LnkCtl:	ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes, Disabled- CommClk-
			ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
		LnkSta:	Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1
			TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
		RootCap: CRSVisible-
		RootCtl: ErrCorrectable- ErrNon-Fatal- ErrFatal- PMEIntEna+ CRSVisible-
		RootSta: PME ReqID 0000, PMEStatus- PMEPending-
		DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Not Supported, TimeoutDis+ NROPrPrP+ LTR+
			 10BitTagComp- 10BitTagReq- OBFF Via message/WAKE#, ExtFmt- EETLPPrefix-
			 EmergencyPowerReduction Not Supported, EmergencyPowerReductionInit-
			 FRS- LN System CLS Not Supported, TPHComp- ExtTPHComp- ARIFwd-
			 AtomicOpsCap: Routing- 32bit- 64bit- 128bitCAS-
		DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis- LTR- 10BitTagReq- OBFF Disabled, ARIFwd-
			 AtomicOpsCtl: ReqEn- EgressBlck-
		LnkCap2: Supported Link Speeds: 2.5-8GT/s, Crosslink- Retimer- 2Retimers- DRS-
		LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 8GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-
			 Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
			 Compliance Preset/De-emphasis: -6dB de-emphasis, 0dB preshoot
		LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -3.5dB, EqualizationComplete- EqualizationPhase1-
			 EqualizationPhase2- EqualizationPhase3- LinkEqualizationRequest-
			 Retimer- 2Retimers- CrosslinkRes: unsupported
	Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=128 Masked-
		Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00020000
		PBA: BAR=4 offset=00028000
	Capabilities: [100 v2] Advanced Error Reporting
		UESta:	DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
		UEMsk:	DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
		UESvrt:	DLP+ SDES+ TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
		CESta:	RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- AdvNonFatalErr-
		CEMsk:	RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- AdvNonFatalErr+
		AERCap:	First Error Pointer: 00, ECRCGenCap+ ECRCGenEn- ECRCChkCap+ ECRCChkEn-
			MultHdrRecCap- MultHdrRecEn- TLPPfxPres- HdrLogCap-
		HeaderLog: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
		RootCmd: CERptEn+ NFERptEn+ FERptEn+
		RootSta: CERcvd- MultCERcvd- UERcvd- MultUERcvd-
			 FirstFatal- NonFatalMsg- FatalMsg- IntMsg 9
		ErrorSrc: ERR_COR: 0000 ERR_FATAL/NONFATAL: 0000
	Capabilities: [148 v1] Secondary PCI Express
		LnkCtl3: LnkEquIntrruptEn- PerformEqu-
		LaneErrStat: 0
	Capabilities: [160 v1] L1 PM Substates
		L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1+ L1_PM_Substates+
			  PortCommonModeRestoreTime=10us PortTPowerOnTime=14us
		L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2- ASPM_L1.1-
			   T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns
		L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us
	Capabilities: [1a0 v1] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0002 Rev=4 Len=100 <?>
	Capabilities: [2a0 v1] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0006 Rev=0 Len=018 <?>
	Kernel driver in use: pcieport


** USB devices:
not available


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.9
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-31-arm64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-30-arm64 depends on:
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initramfs-tool]  0.142+deb12u1
ii  kmod                                    30+20221128-1
ii  linux-base                              4.9

Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-30-arm64 recommends:
ii  apparmor             3.0.8-3
ii  firmware-linux-free  20200122-1

Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-30-arm64 suggests:
pn  debian-kernel-handbook  <none>
pn  linux-doc-6.1           <none>

Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-30-arm64 is related to:
pn  firmware-amd-graphics     <none>
pn  firmware-atheros          <none>
pn  firmware-bnx2             <none>
pn  firmware-bnx2x            <none>
pn  firmware-brcm80211        <none>
pn  firmware-cavium           <none>
pn  firmware-intel-sound      <none>
pn  firmware-intelwimax       <none>
pn  firmware-ipw2x00          <none>
pn  firmware-ivtv             <none>
pn  firmware-iwlwifi          <none>
pn  firmware-libertas         <none>
pn  firmware-linux-nonfree    <none>
pn  firmware-misc-nonfree     <none>
pn  firmware-myricom          <none>
pn  firmware-netxen           <none>
pn  firmware-qlogic           <none>
pn  firmware-realtek          <none>
pn  firmware-samsung          <none>
pn  firmware-siano            <none>
pn  firmware-ti-connectivity  <none>
pn  xen-hypervisor            <none>

-- no debconf information

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#86005

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2025-02-21 08:20 +0100
Message-ID<Kivuh-MZr-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#85576
Hi Matthias,

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Matthias Babisch wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 6.1.124-1
> Severity: important
> File: linux-image-6.1.0
> X-Debbugs-Cc: mb@gosmooth.de
> 
> lspci on system affected
> root@takashi:~# lspci 
> 0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
> 0001:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
> 0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
> 
> lspci on system not affected
> root@kiyoko:~# lspci 
> 0000:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
> 0000:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
> 0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
> 0001:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
> 0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
> 
> System is unaffected if running older kernel. I have two systems. They both
> work if running the older kernel, both don't when running the newer kernel.

I think this is the same as 1098250 and 1095745.

See: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250106100001.1344418-2-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn/

Regards,
SAlvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#86090

FromMatthias Babisch <mb@gosmooth.de>
Date2025-02-23 05:10 +0100
Message-ID<Kjbtv-1hZo-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#86005

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Moin Salvatore.

Am 21.02.25 um 08:11 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Matthias Babisch wrote:
>> Package: src:linux
>> Version: 6.1.124-1
>> Severity: important
>> File: linux-image-6.1.0
>> X-Debbugs-Cc:mb@gosmooth.de
>>
>> lspci on system affected
>> root@takashi:~# lspci
>> 0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
>> 0001:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
>> 0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
>>
>> lspci on system not affected
>> root@kiyoko:~# lspci
>> 0000:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
>> 0000:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
>> 0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
>> 0001:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
>> 0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
>>
>> System is unaffected if running older kernel. I have two systems. They both
>> work if running the older kernel, both don't when running the newer kernel.
> I think this is the same as 1098250 and 1095745.
>
> See:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250106100001.1344418-2-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn/
>
I see a strong similarity to 1098250. Lesser so to 1095745 and the 
patch. But it could very well be.

Its just way beyond my level of expertise ;o) Any idea when the patch is 
entering the debian kernel? I would gladly test a preliminary package if 
that helps. Thank you very much. Matthias Babisch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#86111

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2025-02-24 08:30 +0100
Message-ID<KjB4C-1zD8-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#86090
Hi Matthias,

On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 04:59:34AM +0100, Matthias Babisch wrote:
> Moin Salvatore.
> 
> Am 21.02.25 um 08:11 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> > Hi Matthias,
> > 
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Matthias Babisch wrote:
> > > Package: src:linux
> > > Version: 6.1.124-1
> > > Severity: important
> > > File: linux-image-6.1.0
> > > X-Debbugs-Cc:mb@gosmooth.de
> > > 
> > > lspci on system affected
> > > root@takashi:~# lspci
> > > 0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
> > > 0001:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
> > > 0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
> > > 
> > > lspci on system not affected
> > > root@kiyoko:~# lspci
> > > 0000:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
> > > 0000:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
> > > 0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
> > > 0001:01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller (rev 05)
> > > 0002:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3568 Remote Signal Processor (rev 01)
> > > 
> > > System is unaffected if running older kernel. I have two systems. They both
> > > work if running the older kernel, both don't when running the newer kernel.
> > I think this is the same as 1098250 and 1095745.
> > 
> > See:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250106100001.1344418-2-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn/
> > 
> I see a strong similarity to 1098250. Lesser so to 1095745 and the patch.
> But it could very well be.
> 
> Its just way beyond my level of expertise ;o) Any idea when the patch is
> entering the debian kernel? I would gladly test a preliminary package if
> that helps. Thank you very much. Matthias Babisch

It needs first to land in mainline, from there it needs to be picked
for the supported stable series, at which point we can either
cherry-pick it it advance or flows in when we rebase it the respective
stable version.

So the first step is, having in mainline and the the Linux stable
maintainers queueing it for the stable series.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#86174

From"Diederik de Haas" <didi.debian@cknow.org>
Date2025-02-27 00:20 +0100
Message-ID<KkyR3-2dpM-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#86090

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sun Feb 23, 2025 at 4:59 AM CET, Matthias Babisch wrote:
> Am 21.02.25 um 08:11 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Matthias Babisch wrote:
>>> Package: src:linux
>>> Version: 6.1.124-1
>>>
>>> System is unaffected if running older kernel. I have two systems. They both
>>> work if running the older kernel, both don't when running the newer kernel.
>> I think this is the same as 1098250 and 1095745.
>>
>> See:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250106100001.1344418-2-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn/
>>
> I see a strong similarity to 1098250. Lesser so to 1095745 and the 
> patch. But it could very well be.
>
> Its just way beyond my level of expertise ;o) Any idea when the patch is 
> entering the debian kernel? I would gladly test a preliminary package if 
> that helps. Thank you very much. Matthias Babisch

The following link describes a (relatively) simple way to test a patch:
https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#id-1.6.6.4

I've adapted the patch to the 6.1 kernel so it _should_ work, but
haven't tried it myself. With your freshly build kernel you can verify
if it indeed fixes the problem for 6.1 kernels.

HTH,
  Diederik

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#86199 — Bug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64)

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2025-02-28 13:00 +0100
SubjectBug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64)
Message-ID<Kl7c6-2zcx-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#85576

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:50:21 +0000
with message-id <E1tnysn-006ryy-P3@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1095745: fixed in linux 6.13.5-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1095745,
regarding linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1095745: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095745
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#86202 — Bug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64)

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2025-02-28 13:00 +0100
SubjectBug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64)
Message-ID<Kl7c7-2zcx-69@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#85576

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:50:21 +0000
with message-id <E1tnysn-006rz8-TA@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1098354: fixed in linux 6.13.5-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1098354,
regarding linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1098354: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098354
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#86204 — Bug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64)

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2025-02-28 13:00 +0100
SubjectBug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64)
Message-ID<Kl7c7-2zcx-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#85576

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:50:21 +0000
with message-id <E1tnysn-006rz3-RG@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1098250: fixed in linux 6.13.5-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1098250,
regarding linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1098250: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098250
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#86252 — Bug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64)

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2025-03-02 01:10 +0100
SubjectBug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64)
Message-ID<KlF48-2WTO-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#85576

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Sun, 02 Mar 2025 00:00:10 +0000
with message-id <E1toWkc-006kGy-FE@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1098354: fixed in linux 6.12.17-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1098354,
regarding linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1098354: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098354
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#86256 — Bug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64)

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2025-03-02 01:10 +0100
SubjectBug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64)
Message-ID<KlF4b-2WTO-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#85576

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Sun, 02 Mar 2025 00:00:10 +0000
with message-id <E1toWkc-006kGt-CN@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1098250: fixed in linux 6.12.17-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1098250,
regarding linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1098250: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098250
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#86257 — Bug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64)

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2025-03-02 01:10 +0100
SubjectBug#1098354: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64)
Message-ID<KlF4d-2WTO-57@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#85576

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Sun, 02 Mar 2025 00:00:10 +0000
with message-id <E1toWkc-006kGm-9Y@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1095745: fixed in linux 6.12.17-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1095745,
regarding linux-image-6.1.0: FriendlyElec R5S, one Ethernet-Port / PCI-Device missing on Kernels beyond 6.1.0-28-arm64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1095745: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095745
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web