Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #84174 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-10-03 15:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2025-05-06 13:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1083159: mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2024-10-03 15:40 +0200
Processed: Re: Bug#1083159: mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-10-03 15:40 +0200
Bug#1083159: mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2025-02-21 20:40 +0100
Bug#1083159: mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2025-05-06 12:20 +0200
Bug#1083159: mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2025-05-06 13:00 +0200
| From | Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-10-03 15:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1083159: mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored |
| Message-ID | <JtudH-gEYU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Control: reassign -1 src:linux Control: found -1 6.10.12-1 Control: severity -1 minor Control: notforwarded -1 Control: retitle -1 linux: for tmpfs, /proc/mounts and /proc/self/mountinfo do not always show the size when corresponding to the default, at least on /tmp Summary: On my Debian/unstable machines, a tmpfs file system is mounted on /tmp with the default size=50% option; this is the current default in Debian. In this case, /proc/mounts and the "mount" command (based on /proc/self/mountinfo) do not always show the resulting size (as a number of KB) for /tmp; this is random and can change only after a reboot. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-10-03 15:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Processed: Re: Bug#1083159: mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored |
| Message-ID | <JtudH-gEYU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #84174 |
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:linux Bug #1083159 [systemd] mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored Bug reassigned from package 'systemd' to 'src:linux'. No longer marked as found in versions systemd/256.6-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1083159 to the same values previously set > found -1 6.10.12-1 Bug #1083159 [src:linux] mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored Marked as found in versions linux/6.10.12-1. > severity -1 minor Bug #1083159 [src:linux] mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal' > notforwarded -1 Bug #1083159 [src:linux] mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored Unset Bug forwarded-to-address > retitle -1 linux: for tmpfs, /proc/mounts and /proc/self/mountinfo do not always show the size when corresponding to the default, at least on /tmp Bug #1083159 [src:linux] mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored Changed Bug title to 'linux: for tmpfs, /proc/mounts and /proc/self/mountinfo do not always show the size when corresponding to the default, at least on /tmp' from 'mount: tmpfs size for /tmp is randomly ignored'. -- 1083159: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1083159 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-21 20:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <KiH2p-XUf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #84174 |
Hi Vincent,
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 03:29:47PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 src:linux
> Control: found -1 6.10.12-1
> Control: severity -1 minor
> Control: notforwarded -1
> Control: retitle -1 linux: for tmpfs, /proc/mounts and /proc/self/mountinfo do not always show the size when corresponding to the default, at least on /tmp
>
> Summary: On my Debian/unstable machines, a tmpfs file system is
> mounted on /tmp with the default size=50% option; this is the
> current default in Debian. In this case, /proc/mounts and the
> "mount" command (based on /proc/self/mountinfo) do not always
> show the resulting size (as a number of KB) for /tmp; this is
> random and can change only after a reboot.
I stumpled over this bug while reviewing open bugs, and my take is
that this is actually not a bug. *But* I hope one of my more
experienced colegues in the team might review this claim.
Let's start from:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/vfs.html#mount-options
The important bits are:
Showing options
---------------
If a filesystem accepts mount options, it must define show_options() to
show all the currently active options. The rules are:
- options MUST be shown which are not default or their values differ
from the default
- options MAY be shown which are enabled by default or have their
default value
tmpfs is defined in "mm/shmem.c and we have (current mainline):
5263 #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
5264 .statfs = shmem_statfs,
5265 .show_options = shmem_show_options,
5266 #endif
shmem_show_options() handles showming mount options for tmpfs:
4878 static int shmem_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root)
4879 {
4880 struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo = SHMEM_SB(root->d_sb);
4881 struct mempolicy *mpol;
4882
4883 if (sbinfo->max_blocks != shmem_default_max_blocks())
4884 seq_printf(seq, ",size=%luk", K(sbinfo->max_blocks));
[...]
So size is only showed if sbinfo->max_blocks != shmem_default_max_blocks().
Let's look at shmem_default_max_blocks():
147 #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
148 static unsigned long shmem_default_max_blocks(void)
149 {
150 return totalram_pages() / 2;
151 }
So this is 50% of ram as *default* which matches tmpfs(5):
Mount options
The tmpfs filesystem supports the following mount options:
size=bytes
Specify an upper limit on the size of the filesystem.
The size is given in bytes, and rounded up to entire
pages. The limit is removed if the size is 0.
The size may have a k, m, or g suffix for Ki, Mi, Gi (bi‐
nary kilo (kibi), binary mega (mebi), and binary giga
(gibi)).
The size may also have a % suffix to limit this instance
to a percentage of physical RAM.
The default, when neither size nor nr_blocks is speci‐
fied, is size=50%.
So my undestanding would be that the code here is coherent with the
specification that if size corresponds to the default value, the code
may, but does not must show it.
Does this make sense?
Regards,
Salvatore
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-06 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KJnz3-17tW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #86033 |
Sorry, I forgot to reply...
On 2025-02-21 20:33:21 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Let's start from:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/vfs.html#mount-options
>
> The important bits are:
>
> Showing options
> ---------------
>
> If a filesystem accepts mount options, it must define show_options() to
> show all the currently active options. The rules are:
>
> - options MUST be shown which are not default or their values differ
> from the default
>
> - options MAY be shown which are enabled by default or have their
> default value
But, IMHO, a fixed choice should be made. This should not be random.
Otherwise, this is confusing, and can break scripts that detect
changes in the configuration.
Now, with your analysis of the code...
> tmpfs is defined in "mm/shmem.c and we have (current mainline):
>
> 5263 #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
> 5264 .statfs = shmem_statfs,
> 5265 .show_options = shmem_show_options,
> 5266 #endif
>
> shmem_show_options() handles showming mount options for tmpfs:
>
> 4878 static int shmem_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root)
> 4879 {
> 4880 struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo = SHMEM_SB(root->d_sb);
> 4881 struct mempolicy *mpol;
> 4882
> 4883 if (sbinfo->max_blocks != shmem_default_max_blocks())
> 4884 seq_printf(seq, ",size=%luk", K(sbinfo->max_blocks));
> [...]
>
> So size is only showed if sbinfo->max_blocks != shmem_default_max_blocks().
>
> Let's look at shmem_default_max_blocks():
>
> 147 #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
> 148 static unsigned long shmem_default_max_blocks(void)
> 149 {
> 150 return totalram_pages() / 2;
> 151 }
>
> So this is 50% of ram as *default* which matches tmpfs(5):
>
> Mount options
> The tmpfs filesystem supports the following mount options:
>
> size=bytes
> Specify an upper limit on the size of the filesystem.
> The size is given in bytes, and rounded up to entire
> pages. The limit is removed if the size is 0.
>
> The size may have a k, m, or g suffix for Ki, Mi, Gi (bi‐
> nary kilo (kibi), binary mega (mebi), and binary giga
> (gibi)).
>
> The size may also have a % suffix to limit this instance
> to a percentage of physical RAM.
>
> The default, when neither size nor nr_blocks is speci‐
> fied, is size=50%.
>
> So my undestanding would be that the code here is coherent with the
> specification that if size corresponds to the default value, the code
> may, but does not must show it.
>
> Does this make sense?
According to the above code, the size is never shown for the default
as the condition sbinfo->max_blocks != shmem_default_max_blocks() is
false. But this is not what I observe: the size is shown randomly
(more precisely, whether the size is shown is chosen at boot time),
though it is always the default here.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Pascaline project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-05-06 13:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KJobL-17H1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #87394 |
On 2025-05-06 12:13:24 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2025-02-21 20:33:21 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[...]
> > So size is only showed if sbinfo->max_blocks != shmem_default_max_blocks().
> >
> > Let's look at shmem_default_max_blocks():
> >
> > 147 #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
> > 148 static unsigned long shmem_default_max_blocks(void)
> > 149 {
> > 150 return totalram_pages() / 2;
> > 151 }
[...]
The bug may be the use of totalram_pages(), while the documentation
says:
> > size=bytes
[...]
> > The size may also have a % suffix to limit this instance
> > to a percentage of physical RAM.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
According to https://stackoverflow.com/a/60882958/3782797 (and
the answer given b MistralAI) it is get_num_physpages() that
gives the whole physical memory.
I suspect that totalram_pages() is not constant over the time,
so using it is buggy as there is no way for the user to know
what size is actually used for the 50% default.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Pascaline project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel
csiph-web