Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #88079 > unrolled thread

Please enable CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL

Started byalexandre.ferrieux@orange.com
First post2025-06-20 15:20 +0200
Last post2025-06-23 22:30 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel


Contents

  Please enable CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL alexandre.ferrieux@orange.com - 2025-06-20 15:20 +0200
    Re: Please enable CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2025-06-23 22:30 +0200

#88079 — Please enable CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL

Fromalexandre.ferrieux@orange.com
Date2025-06-20 15:20 +0200
SubjectPlease enable CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL
Message-ID<KZJOV-bU0X-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Dear Maintainers,

I have posted https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106120 , but I
understand that due to the precise kernel version being part of the package name
("linux-image-6.12.19-amd64"), the report is not automatically pushed to more
recent versions.

So, I'm taking the liberty to ask you directly: could you please have a look ?

In summary: ftrace has a new feature "funcgraph-retval" that is simultaneously a
life-saver for hard kernel investigations in production, absolutely innocuous
for the non-debug workflow, and of very light overhead for the debug workflow
(as there is a runtime toggle).
These investigations happen on real-life servers where recompiling the kernel is
out of the question; so, it is very frustrating to see it disabled in Debian
production kernels.
Thanks in advance,

-Alex

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#88123

FromBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Date2025-06-23 22:30 +0200
Message-ID<L0VXH-cFe8-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#88079

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, 2025-06-20 at 14:46 +0200, alexandre.ferrieux@orange.com wrote:
> Dear Maintainers,
> 
> I have posted https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106120 , but I
> understand that due to the precise kernel version being part of the package name
> ("linux-image-6.12.19-amd64"), the report is not automatically pushed to more
> recent versions.
[...]

The report was automatically assigned to the linux source package, not
to that specific versioned binary package.  So it is still visible as a
relevant bug report.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Power corrupts.  Absolute power is kind of neat. - John Lehman

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel


csiph-web