Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #84151 > unrolled thread

Bug#1083098: Can't create NFSv4 referrals

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

Contents

  Bug#1083098: Can't create NFSv4 referrals Anton Lundin <glance@ac2.se> - 2024-10-01 17:10 +0200
    Bug#1083098: Can't create NFSv4 referrals Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-10-01 17:50 +0200
      Bug#1083098: Can't create NFSv4 referrals Anton Lundin <glance@ac2.se> - 2024-10-02 21:00 +0200
    Bug#1083098: marked as done (regression from bullseye: NFS4  referals appear not to work) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-12-09 20:00 +0100
    Bug#1083098: marked as done (regression from bullseye: NFS4  referals appear not to work) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-12-09 20:00 +0100
    Bug#1083098: marked as done (regression from bullseye: NFS4  referals appear not to work) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-12-21 18:30 +0100
    Bug#1083098: marked as done (regression from bullseye: NFS4  referals appear not to work) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-12-21 18:30 +0100

#84151 — Bug#1083098: Can't create NFSv4 referrals

Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 2.6.2-4

I've used NFSv4 referalls to contralize my configuration of which
nfs-server servers which shares.

I've just configured in /etc/exports like:
/srv/foo -async,no_subtree_check,refer=/srv/foo@bar @NFS_Client_M

After upgrading to bookworm from bullseye, the server doesn't expose any
referalls any longer.

I guess that this has something to do with the transition to nfsref, but
I've not managed to get this working in bookworm, and it's a regression
from what was working in bullseye.

//Anton

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#84152

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 04:50:59PM +0200, Anton Lundin wrote:
> Package: nfs-kernel-server
> Version: 2.6.2-4
> 
> I've used NFSv4 referalls to contralize my configuration of which
> nfs-server servers which shares.
> 
> I've just configured in /etc/exports like:
> /srv/foo -async,no_subtree_check,refer=/srv/foo@bar @NFS_Client_M
> 
> After upgrading to bookworm from bullseye, the server doesn't expose any
> referalls any longer.
> 
> I guess that this has something to do with the transition to nfsref, but
> I've not managed to get this working in bookworm, and it's a regression
> from what was working in bullseye.

This is likely the same as #1035908, where I asked Sam if he is able
to pinpont the issue, in which case it would be great to have it
reported upstream.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84166

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Some investigating later, I've concluded that the following patch
gets NFS4 referals working again.

//Anton

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84780 — Bug#1083098: marked as done (regression from bullseye: NFS4 referals appear not to work)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Mon, 09 Dec 2024 18:50:11 +0000
with message-id <E1tKipf-0025Wy-18@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1083098: fixed in nfs-utils 1:2.8.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1083098,
regarding regression from bullseye: NFS4 referals appear not to work
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1083098: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1083098
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84783 — Bug#1083098: marked as done (regression from bullseye: NFS4 referals appear not to work)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Mon, 09 Dec 2024 18:50:10 +0000
with message-id <E1tKipe-0025Wt-VE@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1035908: fixed in nfs-utils 1:2.8.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035908,
regarding regression from bullseye: NFS4 referals appear not to work
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1035908: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035908
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84904 — Bug#1083098: marked as done (regression from bullseye: NFS4 referals appear not to work)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Sat, 21 Dec 2024 17:17:10 +0000
with message-id <E1tP36E-009zMc-58@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1083098: fixed in nfs-utils 1:2.6.2-4+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1083098,
regarding regression from bullseye: NFS4 referals appear not to work
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1083098: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1083098
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84905 — Bug#1083098: marked as done (regression from bullseye: NFS4 referals appear not to work)

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Sat, 21 Dec 2024 17:17:10 +0000
with message-id <E1tP36E-009zMX-3K@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1035908: fixed in nfs-utils 1:2.6.2-4+deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035908,
regarding regression from bullseye: NFS4 referals appear not to work
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1035908: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035908
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web