Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #84784 > unrolled thread

Bug#1035908: Bullseye regression: NFS4 referals appear not to work

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Bug#1035908: Bullseye regression: NFS4 referals appear not to work Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-12-09 21:50 +0100
    Bug#1035908: Bullseye regression: NFS4 referals appear not to work Anton Lundin <glance@ac2.se> - 2024-12-10 00:40 +0100
      Bug#1035908: Bullseye regression: NFS4 referals appear not to work Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-12-11 10:40 +0100
        Bug#1035908: Bullseye regression: NFS4 referals appear not to work Anton Lundin <glance@ac2.se> - 2024-12-11 14:20 +0100
          Bug#1035908: Bullseye regression: NFS4 referals appear not to work Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-12-11 14:30 +0100

#84784 — Bug#1035908: Bullseye regression: NFS4 referals appear not to work

Hi Sam, hi Anton

I have prepared the change for nfs-utils in bookworm to fix the NFSv4
referrals regression in bookworm in 

https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/nfs-utils/-/merge_requests/34

I plan to submit the change for the upcoming point release, but would
appreciate if you give the change a try. It maches what was discussed
and proposed by Anton as well.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#84785

On 09 December, 2024 - Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

> Hi Sam, hi Anton
> 
> I have prepared the change for nfs-utils in bookworm to fix the NFSv4
> referrals regression in bookworm in 
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/nfs-utils/-/merge_requests/34
> 
> I plan to submit the change for the upcoming point release, but would
> appreciate if you give the change a try. It maches what was discussed
> and proposed by Anton as well.

That patch looks pretty much exactly like the one I have in a local git
tree ontop of nfs-utils-2-7-2-rc1, from which I've built a rpc.mountd
which have been running in production since Oct 2.

I'll rebuild a mountd based on exactly your code and test it tomorrow.


//Anton

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84790

Hi Anton,

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 12:27:34AM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
> On 09 December, 2024 - Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> 
> > Hi Sam, hi Anton
> > 
> > I have prepared the change for nfs-utils in bookworm to fix the NFSv4
> > referrals regression in bookworm in 
> > 
> > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/nfs-utils/-/merge_requests/34
> > 
> > I plan to submit the change for the upcoming point release, but would
> > appreciate if you give the change a try. It maches what was discussed
> > and proposed by Anton as well.
> 
> That patch looks pretty much exactly like the one I have in a local git
> tree ontop of nfs-utils-2-7-2-rc1, from which I've built a rpc.mountd
> which have been running in production since Oct 2.
> 
> I'll rebuild a mountd based on exactly your code and test it tomorrow.

yes thanks, that would be great to hear before I fill the request for
bookworm to the stable release managers. 

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84795

On 11 December, 2024 - Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

> Hi Anton,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 12:27:34AM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
> > On 09 December, 2024 - Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Sam, hi Anton
> > > 
> > > I have prepared the change for nfs-utils in bookworm to fix the NFSv4
> > > referrals regression in bookworm in 
> > > 
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/nfs-utils/-/merge_requests/34
> > > 
> > > I plan to submit the change for the upcoming point release, but would
> > > appreciate if you give the change a try. It maches what was discussed
> > > and proposed by Anton as well.
> > 
> > That patch looks pretty much exactly like the one I have in a local git
> > tree ontop of nfs-utils-2-7-2-rc1, from which I've built a rpc.mountd
> > which have been running in production since Oct 2.
> > 
> > I'll rebuild a mountd based on exactly your code and test it tomorrow.
> 
> yes thanks, that would be great to hear before I fill the request for
> bookworm to the stable release managers. 

So, i've tested a mountd from 490befe340c6d3995fc8b007db2df48bf5d1eb00
and it works as expected, and my referrals work, so LGTM.


//Anton

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84796

Hi Anton,

On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 02:13:00PM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
> On 11 December, 2024 - Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> 
> > Hi Anton,
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 12:27:34AM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
> > > On 09 December, 2024 - Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Sam, hi Anton
> > > > 
> > > > I have prepared the change for nfs-utils in bookworm to fix the NFSv4
> > > > referrals regression in bookworm in 
> > > > 
> > > > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/nfs-utils/-/merge_requests/34
> > > > 
> > > > I plan to submit the change for the upcoming point release, but would
> > > > appreciate if you give the change a try. It maches what was discussed
> > > > and proposed by Anton as well.
> > > 
> > > That patch looks pretty much exactly like the one I have in a local git
> > > tree ontop of nfs-utils-2-7-2-rc1, from which I've built a rpc.mountd
> > > which have been running in production since Oct 2.
> > > 
> > > I'll rebuild a mountd based on exactly your code and test it tomorrow.
> > 
> > yes thanks, that would be great to hear before I fill the request for
> > bookworm to the stable release managers. 
> 
> So, i've tested a mountd from 490befe340c6d3995fc8b007db2df48bf5d1eb00
> and it works as expected, and my referrals work, so LGTM.

Thanks a lot for the confirmation!

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web