Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #82240 > unrolled thread

Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares

Started byManfred Larcher <supp@grufo.com>
First post2024-04-16 14:30 +0200
Last post2024-05-08 19:40 +0200
Articles 10 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

Contents

  Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares Manfred Larcher <supp@grufo.com> - 2024-04-16 14:30 +0200
    Processed: Re: Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs  mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-04-16 18:00 +0200
    Processed: Re: Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs  mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-04-16 18:00 +0200
    Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-04-16 18:00 +0200
      Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-04-16 23:10 +0200
        Bug#1069092: Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-04-17 10:40 +0200
    Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares Mark Ullmann <email4debian@gmx.net> - 2024-04-21 20:30 +0200
    Bug#1069102: Acknowledgement (linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares) Manfred Larcher <supp@grufo.com> - 2024-04-22 12:10 +0200
    Bug#1069102: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs  mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-05-08 19:40 +0200
    Bug#1069102: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs  mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-05-08 19:40 +0200

#82240 — Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares

FromManfred Larcher <supp@grufo.com>
Date2024-04-16 14:30 +0200
SubjectBug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares
Message-ID<ItQ6J-6FjH-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.85-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

    * What led up to the situation?
kernel update from version 6.1.0-18 to 6.1.0-20

    * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
      ineffective)?
out system mounted a samba share via autofs (cifs) and we tried to 
access some files and directories

    * What was the outcome of this action?
the mount point of our share is /srv/samba/shares/company and the 
directory it/MIJ had another directory "digitale kommunikation" which 
did not shop up on the computer which mounted the samba share. before 
the kernel update it did and when we renamed the file to 
"digitale_kommunikation" or to "digitalo kommunikation" we could see it.
in the syslog we found the following messages:
CIFS: VFS: directory entry name would overflow frame end of buf ...
we could move that direcotry into another directory and it was useable, 
we created another directory it/abc and created the "digitale 
kommunikation" inside and it was hidden again. after switching back to 
kernel 6.1.0-20 everything was ok.
upgrade to kernel 6.5.0-0.deb12.4-amd64 package was ok too.

    * What outcome did you expect instead?
we expected to just see the "digitale kommunikation" directory as before.


-- Package-specific info:
** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.1
   APT prefers stable-updates
   APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-0.deb12.4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE 
not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 depends on:
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initramfs-tool]  0.142
ii  kmod                                    30+20221128-1
ii  linux-base                              4.9

Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 recommends:
ii  apparmor             3.0.8-3
ii  firmware-linux-free  20200122-1

Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 suggests:
pn  debian-kernel-handbook  <none>
ii  grub-efi-amd64          2.06-13+deb12u1
pn  linux-doc-6.1           <none>

Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 is related to:
pn  firmware-amd-graphics     <none>
pn  firmware-atheros          <none>
pn  firmware-bnx2             <none>
pn  firmware-bnx2x            <none>
pn  firmware-brcm80211        <none>
pn  firmware-cavium           <none>
pn  firmware-intel-sound      <none>
pn  firmware-intelwimax       <none>
pn  firmware-ipw2x00          <none>
pn  firmware-ivtv             <none>
pn  firmware-iwlwifi          <none>
pn  firmware-libertas         <none>
pn  firmware-linux-nonfree    <none>
pn  firmware-misc-nonfree     <none>
pn  firmware-myricom          <none>
pn  firmware-netxen           <none>
pn  firmware-qlogic           <none>
pn  firmware-realtek          <none>
pn  firmware-samsung          <none>
pn  firmware-siano            <none>
pn  firmware-ti-connectivity  <none>
pn  xen-hypervisor            <none>

-- no debconf information

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#82248 — Processed: Re: Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2024-04-16 18:00 +0200
SubjectProcessed: Re: Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares
Message-ID<ItTnX-6HgD-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#82240
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1069102 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares
Bug #1069092 [src:linux] Kernel 6.1.85-1 breaking CIFS mounts?
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1069102 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1069092 to the same tags previously set

-- 
1069092: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069092
1069102: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#82249 — Processed: Re: Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2024-04-16 18:00 +0200
SubjectProcessed: Re: Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares
Message-ID<ItTnX-6HgD-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#82240
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1069102 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares
Bug #1069092 [src:linux] Kernel 6.1.85-1 breaking CIFS mounts?
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
1069092: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069092
1069102: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#82250

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2024-04-16 18:00 +0200
Message-ID<ItTnX-6HgD-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#82240
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

Hi


On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:17:49PM +0200, Manfred Larcher wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 6.1.85-1
> Severity: important
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
>    * What led up to the situation?
> kernel update from version 6.1.0-18 to 6.1.0-20
> 
>    * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
>      ineffective)?
> out system mounted a samba share via autofs (cifs) and we tried to access
> some files and directories
> 
>    * What was the outcome of this action?
> the mount point of our share is /srv/samba/shares/company and the directory
> it/MIJ had another directory "digitale kommunikation" which did not shop up
> on the computer which mounted the samba share. before the kernel update it
> did and when we renamed the file to "digitale_kommunikation" or to "digitalo
> kommunikation" we could see it.
> in the syslog we found the following messages:
> CIFS: VFS: directory entry name would overflow frame end of buf ...
> we could move that direcotry into another directory and it was useable, we
> created another directory it/abc and created the "digitale kommunikation"
> inside and it was hidden again. after switching back to kernel 6.1.0-20
> everything was ok.
> upgrade to kernel 6.5.0-0.deb12.4-amd64 package was ok too.
> 
>    * What outcome did you expect instead?
> we expected to just see the "digitale kommunikation" directory as before.

Can you share details on how the cifs mounts are done? Which mount
options are used?

Were you able to find a minimal reproducing case which would help
debug the issue on non production systems?

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#82256

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2024-04-16 23:10 +0200
Message-ID<ItYdX-6Ksb-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#82250

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 05:46:33PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> 
> Hi
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:17:49PM +0200, Manfred Larcher wrote:
> > Package: src:linux
> > Version: 6.1.85-1
> > Severity: important
> > 
> > Dear Maintainer,
> > 
> >    * What led up to the situation?
> > kernel update from version 6.1.0-18 to 6.1.0-20
> > 
> >    * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> >      ineffective)?
> > out system mounted a samba share via autofs (cifs) and we tried to access
> > some files and directories
> > 
> >    * What was the outcome of this action?
> > the mount point of our share is /srv/samba/shares/company and the directory
> > it/MIJ had another directory "digitale kommunikation" which did not shop up
> > on the computer which mounted the samba share. before the kernel update it
> > did and when we renamed the file to "digitale_kommunikation" or to "digitalo
> > kommunikation" we could see it.
> > in the syslog we found the following messages:
> > CIFS: VFS: directory entry name would overflow frame end of buf ...
> > we could move that direcotry into another directory and it was useable, we
> > created another directory it/abc and created the "digitale kommunikation"
> > inside and it was hidden again. after switching back to kernel 6.1.0-20
> > everything was ok.
> > upgrade to kernel 6.5.0-0.deb12.4-amd64 package was ok too.
> > 
> >    * What outcome did you expect instead?
> > we expected to just see the "digitale kommunikation" directory as before.
> 
> Can you share details on how the cifs mounts are done? Which mount
> options are used?
> 
> Were you able to find a minimal reproducing case which would help
> debug the issue on non production systems?

Can you confirm you are seeing the issue only if mounting with using
'noserverino' mount option?

Would you be in the position of building a kernel with a commit
reverted and verify the issue is gone with it?

If you follow
https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#id-1.6.6.4
with the attached patch, you should be able to get a kernel image to
test with.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#82262 — Bug#1069092: Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2024-04-17 10:40 +0200
SubjectBug#1069092: Bug#1069102: linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares
Message-ID<Iu8ZH-6Rbu-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#82256
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:49:54PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 05:46:33PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:17:49PM +0200, Manfred Larcher wrote:
> > > Package: src:linux
> > > Version: 6.1.85-1
> > > Severity: important
> > > 
> > > Dear Maintainer,
> > > 
> > >    * What led up to the situation?
> > > kernel update from version 6.1.0-18 to 6.1.0-20
> > > 
> > >    * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> > >      ineffective)?
> > > out system mounted a samba share via autofs (cifs) and we tried to access
> > > some files and directories
> > > 
> > >    * What was the outcome of this action?
> > > the mount point of our share is /srv/samba/shares/company and the directory
> > > it/MIJ had another directory "digitale kommunikation" which did not shop up
> > > on the computer which mounted the samba share. before the kernel update it
> > > did and when we renamed the file to "digitale_kommunikation" or to "digitalo
> > > kommunikation" we could see it.
> > > in the syslog we found the following messages:
> > > CIFS: VFS: directory entry name would overflow frame end of buf ...
> > > we could move that direcotry into another directory and it was useable, we
> > > created another directory it/abc and created the "digitale kommunikation"
> > > inside and it was hidden again. after switching back to kernel 6.1.0-20
> > > everything was ok.
> > > upgrade to kernel 6.5.0-0.deb12.4-amd64 package was ok too.
> > > 
> > >    * What outcome did you expect instead?
> > > we expected to just see the "digitale kommunikation" directory as before.
> > 
> > Can you share details on how the cifs mounts are done? Which mount
> > options are used?
> > 
> > Were you able to find a minimal reproducing case which would help
> > debug the issue on non production systems?
> 
> Can you confirm you are seeing the issue only if mounting with using
> 'noserverino' mount option?
> 
> Would you be in the position of building a kernel with a commit
> reverted and verify the issue is gone with it?
> 
> If you follow
> https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#id-1.6.6.4
> with the attached patch, you should be able to get a kernel image to
> test with.

I'm able to reproduce the behaviour on a test machine, when using
noserverino mount option, but I'm yet trying to further reduce the
testcase to be able to report upstream. The issue happens as well
already in 6.1.82.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#82288

FromMark Ullmann <email4debian@gmx.net>
Date2024-04-21 20:30 +0200
Message-ID<IvK6R-7V5L-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#82240
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.85-1
Followup-For: Bug #1069102
X-Debbugs-Cc: email4debian@gmx.net

Dear Maintainer,

I noticed the same issue.

I have a mount:
mount -t cifs //XXX/Backups/borg-backup /mnt/backups -o
noserverino,credentials=/etc/xxx,file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777  -vvv

In the mounted directory, a folder is missing. I can see the folder
when I connect to the share via Dolphin.
(This is a backup-drive and I noticed because borg-backup threw errors.)

This is reproducible: after a reboot and mounting the share again, the same
folder is missing and the other folders are shown.


I build a kernel with the patch from #26, which I am running right now. The
problem seems to be gone: borg-backup now runs cleanly. So I assume the mount
is fine with the patch from #26.

I could probably test a kernel if it installs on stable.

Best, Mark.


*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- Package-specific info:
** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached

** Model information
sys_vendor: TUXEDO
product_name: N24_25BU
product_version: Not Applicable                  
chassis_vendor: TUXEDO
chassis_version: N/A                             
bios_vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
bios_version: 5.12
board_vendor: TUXEDO
board_name: N24_25BU
board_version: Not Applicable                  

** Network interface configuration:
*** /etc/network/interfaces:

source /etc/network/interfaces.d/*

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

** PCI devices:
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th Gen Core Processor Host Bridge/DRAM Registers [8086:5904] (rev 02)
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th Gen Core Processor Host Bridge/DRAM Registers [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort+ >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0
	IOMMU group: 1
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: skl_uncore

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation HD Graphics 620 [8086:5916] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer HD Graphics 620 [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 134
	IOMMU group: 0
	Region 0: Memory at de000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
	Region 2: Memory at c0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
	Region 4: I/O ports at f000 [size=64]
	Expansion ROM at 000c0000 [virtual] [disabled] [size=128K]
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: i915
	Kernel modules: i915

00:08.0 System peripheral [0880]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v5/v6 / E3-1500 v5 / 6th/7th/8th Gen Core Processor Gaussian Mixture Model [8086:1911]
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Xeon E3-1200 v5/v6 / E3-1500 v5 / 6th/7th/8th Gen Core Processor Gaussian Mixture Model [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 255
	IOMMU group: 2
	Region 0: Memory at df32f000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=4K]
	Capabilities: <access denied>

00:14.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP USB 3.0 xHCI Controller [8086:9d2f] (rev 21) (prog-if 30 [XHCI])
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Sunrise Point-LP USB 3.0 xHCI Controller [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 126
	IOMMU group: 3
	Region 0: Memory at df310000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: xhci_hcd
	Kernel modules: xhci_pci

00:14.2 Signal processing controller [1180]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP Thermal subsystem [8086:9d31] (rev 21)
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Sunrise Point-LP Thermal subsystem [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Interrupt: pin C routed to IRQ 18
	IOMMU group: 3
	Region 0: Memory at df32e000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: intel_pch_thermal
	Kernel modules: intel_pch_thermal

00:16.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP CSME HECI #1 [8086:9d3a] (rev 21)
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Sunrise Point-LP CSME HECI [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 135
	IOMMU group: 4
	Region 0: Memory at df32d000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: mei_me
	Kernel modules: mei_me

00:17.0 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP SATA Controller [AHCI mode] [8086:9d03] (rev 21) (prog-if 01 [AHCI 1.0])
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Sunrise Point-LP SATA Controller [AHCI mode] [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 127
	IOMMU group: 5
	Region 0: Memory at df328000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
	Region 1: Memory at df32c000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
	Region 2: I/O ports at f090 [size=8]
	Region 3: I/O ports at f080 [size=4]
	Region 4: I/O ports at f060 [size=32]
	Region 5: Memory at df32b000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2K]
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: ahci
	Kernel modules: ahci

00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #1 [8086:9d10] (rev f1) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Sunrise Point-LP PCI Express Root Port [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 122
	IOMMU group: 6
	Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
	I/O behind bridge: [disabled] [16-bit]
	Memory behind bridge: df200000-df2fffff [size=1M] [32-bit]
	Prefetchable memory behind bridge: [disabled] [64-bit]
	Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort+ <SERR- <PERR-
	BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR+ NoISA- VGA- VGA16+ MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
		PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: pcieport

00:1c.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #3 [8086:9d12] (rev f1) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Sunrise Point-LP PCI Express Root Port [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
	Interrupt: pin C routed to IRQ 123
	IOMMU group: 7
	Bus: primary=00, secondary=02, subordinate=02, sec-latency=0
	I/O behind bridge: [disabled] [16-bit]
	Memory behind bridge: df100000-df1fffff [size=1M] [32-bit]
	Prefetchable memory behind bridge: [disabled] [64-bit]
	Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort+ <SERR- <PERR-
	BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR+ NoISA- VGA- VGA16+ MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
		PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: pcieport

00:1c.5 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #6 [8086:9d15] (rev f1) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Sunrise Point-LP PCI Express Root Port [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
	Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 124
	IOMMU group: 8
	Bus: primary=00, secondary=03, subordinate=03, sec-latency=0
	I/O behind bridge: e000-efff [size=4K] [16-bit]
	Memory behind bridge: df000000-df0fffff [size=1M] [32-bit]
	Prefetchable memory behind bridge: [disabled] [64-bit]
	Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort+ <SERR- <PERR-
	BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR+ NoISA- VGA- VGA16+ MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
		PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: pcieport

00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP LPC Controller [8086:9d58] (rev 21)
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Sunrise Point-LP LPC Controller [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
	Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0
	IOMMU group: 9

00:1f.2 Memory controller [0580]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP PMC [8086:9d21] (rev 21)
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Sunrise Point-LP PMC [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
	Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	IOMMU group: 9
	Region 0: Memory at df324000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=16K]

00:1f.3 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP HD Audio [8086:9d71] (rev 21)
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Sunrise Point-LP HD Audio [1558:2411]
	Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 32, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 137
	IOMMU group: 9
	Region 0: Memory at df320000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
	Region 4: Memory at df300000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel
	Kernel modules: snd_hda_intel, snd_soc_skl, snd_sof_pci_intel_skl

00:1f.4 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP SMBus [8086:9d23] (rev 21)
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Sunrise Point-LP SMBus [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
	Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
	IOMMU group: 9
	Region 0: Memory at df32a000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
	Region 4: I/O ports at f040 [size=32]
	Kernel driver in use: i801_smbus
	Kernel modules: i2c_i801

01:00.0 USB controller [0c03]: ASMedia Technology Inc. ASM1142 USB 3.1 Host Controller [1b21:1242] (prog-if 30 [XHCI])
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer ASM1142 USB 3.1 Host Controller [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
	IOMMU group: 10
	Region 0: Memory at df200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=32K]
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: xhci_hcd
	Kernel modules: xhci_pci

02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Wireless 8265 / 8275 [8086:24fd] (rev 78)
	Subsystem: Intel Corporation Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 [8086:1010]
	Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 136
	IOMMU group: 11
	Region 0: Memory at df100000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: iwlwifi
	Kernel modules: iwlwifi

03:00.0 Unassigned class [ff00]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8411B PCI Express Card Reader [10ec:5287] (rev 01)
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer RTL8411B PCI Express Card Reader [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
	Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 125
	IOMMU group: 12
	Region 0: Memory at df015000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
	Expansion ROM at df000000 [disabled] [size=64K]
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: rtsx_pci
	Kernel modules: rtsx_pci

03:00.1 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller [10ec:8168] (rev 12)
	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller [1558:2410]
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 19
	IOMMU group: 12
	Region 0: I/O ports at e000 [size=256]
	Region 2: Memory at df014000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
	Region 4: Memory at df010000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel driver in use: r8169
	Kernel modules: r8169


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-0.a.test-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 depends on:
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initramfs-tool]  0.142
ii  kmod                                    30+20221128-1
ii  linux-base                              4.9

Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 recommends:
ii  apparmor             3.0.8-3
ii  firmware-linux-free  20200122-1

Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 suggests:
pn  debian-kernel-handbook  <none>
ii  extlinux                3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3+b1
ii  grub-efi-amd64          2.06-13+deb12u1
pn  linux-doc-6.1           <none>

Versions of packages linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 is related to:
ii  firmware-amd-graphics     20230210-5
pn  firmware-atheros          <none>
pn  firmware-bnx2             <none>
pn  firmware-bnx2x            <none>
pn  firmware-brcm80211        <none>
pn  firmware-cavium           <none>
pn  firmware-intel-sound      <none>
pn  firmware-intelwimax       <none>
pn  firmware-ipw2x00          <none>
pn  firmware-ivtv             <none>
ii  firmware-iwlwifi          20230210-5
pn  firmware-libertas         <none>
ii  firmware-linux-nonfree    20230210-5
ii  firmware-misc-nonfree     20230210-5
pn  firmware-myricom          <none>
pn  firmware-netxen           <none>
pn  firmware-qlogic           <none>
ii  firmware-realtek          20230210-5
pn  firmware-samsung          <none>
pn  firmware-siano            <none>
pn  firmware-ti-connectivity  <none>
pn  xen-hypervisor            <none>

-- no debconf information

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#82294 — Bug#1069102: Acknowledgement (linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares)

FromManfred Larcher <supp@grufo.com>
Date2024-04-22 12:10 +0200
SubjectBug#1069102: Acknowledgement (linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares)
Message-ID<IvYMy-84qo-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#82240
Hi,
any news on this?
Regards
Manfred

Am 16.04.24 um 14:21 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
> 
> You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1069102: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069102.
> 
> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
> has been received.
> 
> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
> interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
> 
> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
>   Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
> 
> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
> send it to 1069102@bugs.debian.org.
> 
> Please do not send mail to owner@bugs.debian.org unless you wish
> to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#82390 — Bug#1069102: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares)

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2024-05-08 19:40 +0200
SubjectBug#1069102: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares)
Message-ID<IBTqO-bYnJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#82240

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Wed, 08 May 2024 17:32:23 +0000
with message-id <E1s4l9T-004Cck-Cf@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1069092: fixed in linux 6.1.90-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069092,
regarding linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1069092: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069092
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#82393 — Bug#1069102: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares)

From"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date2024-05-08 19:40 +0200
SubjectBug#1069102: marked as done (linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares)
Message-ID<IBTqQ-bYnJ-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#82240

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Your message dated Wed, 08 May 2024 17:32:23 +0000
with message-id <E1s4l9T-004Ccp-G1@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1069102: fixed in linux 6.1.90-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069102,
regarding linux-image-6.1.0-20-amd64 and cifs mount problem on some folders which get hidden on shares
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1069102: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web