Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #80341 > unrolled thread

Re: Releasing linux/6.1.52-1 bookworm-security update without armel build, Image size problems

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Releasing linux/6.1.52-1 bookworm-security update without armel  build, Image size problems Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2023-09-09 11:10 +0200
    Re: Releasing linux/6.1.52-1 bookworm-security update without armel  build, Image size problems Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2023-09-09 12:50 +0200
      Re: Releasing linux/6.1.52-1 bookworm-security update without armel  build, Image size problems Domenico Andreoli <cavok@debian.org> - 2023-09-13 07:40 +0200

#80341 — Re: Releasing linux/6.1.52-1 bookworm-security update without armel build, Image size problems

On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>...
> - Relese the DSA without armel builds. This is not optimal and for the point release
>   we need to have to have all builds, but this gives people who still are interested
>   in this architecture to step up and propose a fix for the problem, otherwise then
>   disable the image size check, and then effectively dropping some support.
>...
> armel people, can you have ideally look at it ASAP on the comments
> please, I would not like to delay the DSA for linux on
> bookworm-security too much.

Releasing this DSA without armel and sorting out the issue for the point 
release sounds like the best option to me.

> Thanks for having a look,
> 
> Regards,
> Salvatore

cu
Adrian

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#80344

Hi,

On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 11:49:11AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >...
> > - Relese the DSA without armel builds. This is not optimal and for the point release
> >   we need to have to have all builds, but this gives people who still are interested
> >   in this architecture to step up and propose a fix for the problem, otherwise then
> >   disable the image size check, and then effectively dropping some support.
> >...
> > armel people, can you have ideally look at it ASAP on the comments
> > please, I would not like to delay the DSA for linux on
> > bookworm-security too much.
> 
> Releasing this DSA without armel and sorting out the issue for the point 
> release sounds like the best option to me.

FWIW, following Ben's aproach for unstable, here is my proposed change
for bookworm in the near-term:

https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/844

I have verified by cross-building that the image size goes down to

Image size 2644124/2729712, using 96.86%.  Image fits.  Continuing.

which would be sufficient so far.

So we can at least include the above for the point release and
releasing the DSA earlier without the armel builds.

Thank you!

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#80412

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 12:43:20PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 11:49:11AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > >...
> > > - Relese the DSA without armel builds. This is not optimal and for the point release
> > >   we need to have to have all builds, but this gives people who still are interested
> > >   in this architecture to step up and propose a fix for the problem, otherwise then
> > >   disable the image size check, and then effectively dropping some support.
> > >...
> > > armel people, can you have ideally look at it ASAP on the comments
> > > please, I would not like to delay the DSA for linux on
> > > bookworm-security too much.
> > 
> > Releasing this DSA without armel and sorting out the issue for the point 
> > release sounds like the best option to me.
> 
> FWIW, following Ben's aproach for unstable, here is my proposed change
> for bookworm in the near-term:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/844
> 
> I have verified by cross-building that the image size goes down to
> 
> Image size 2644124/2729712, using 96.86%.  Image fits.  Continuing.
> 
> which would be sufficient so far.
> 
> So we can at least include the above for the point release and
> releasing the DSA earlier without the armel builds.

Looks good to me. Thanks!

> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Regards,
> Salvatore
> 

-- 
rsa4096: 3B10 0CA1 8674 ACBA B4FE  FCD2 CE5B CF17 9960 DE13
ed25519: FFB4 0CC3 7F2E 091D F7DA  356E CC79 2832 ED38 CB05

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.kernel

csiph-web